Cargando…

A micro-architectural evaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implant placement in proximal femoral fractures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The micro-architecture of bone has been increasingly recognized as an important determinant of bone strength. Successful operative stabilization of fractures depends on bone strength. We evaluated the osseous micro-architecture and strength of the osteoporotic human femoral h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenkins, Paul J, Ramaesh, Rishikesan, Pankaj, Pankaj, Patton, James T, Howie, Colin R, Goffin, Jérôme M, van der Merwe, Andrew, Wallace, Robert J, Porter, Daniel E, Simpson, A Hamish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3822129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24032522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.842432
_version_ 1782290387147161600
author Jenkins, Paul J
Ramaesh, Rishikesan
Pankaj, Pankaj
Patton, James T
Howie, Colin R
Goffin, Jérôme M
van der Merwe, Andrew
Wallace, Robert J
Porter, Daniel E
Simpson, A Hamish
author_facet Jenkins, Paul J
Ramaesh, Rishikesan
Pankaj, Pankaj
Patton, James T
Howie, Colin R
Goffin, Jérôme M
van der Merwe, Andrew
Wallace, Robert J
Porter, Daniel E
Simpson, A Hamish
author_sort Jenkins, Paul J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The micro-architecture of bone has been increasingly recognized as an important determinant of bone strength. Successful operative stabilization of fractures depends on bone strength. We evaluated the osseous micro-architecture and strength of the osteoporotic human femoral head. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 6 femoral heads, obtained during arthroplasty surgery for femoral neck fracture, underwent micro-computed tomography (microCT) scanning at 30 μm, and bone volume ratio (BV/TV), trabecular thickness, structural model index, connection density, and degree of anisotropy for volumes of interest throughout the head were derived. A further 15 femoral heads underwent mechanical testing of compressive failure stress of cubes of trabecular bone from different regions of the head. RESULTS: The greatest density and trabecular thickness was found in the central core that extended from the medial calcar to the physeal scar. This region also correlated with the greatest degree of anisotropy and proportion of plate-like trabeculae. In the epiphyseal region, the trabeculae were organized radially from the physeal scar. The weakest area was found at the apex and peripheral areas of the head. The strongest region was at the center of the head. INTERPRETATION: The center of the femoral head contained the strongest trabecular bone, with the thickest, most dense trabeculae. The apical region was weaker. From an anatomical and mechanical point of view, implants that achieve fixation in or below this central core may achieve the most stable fixation during fracture healing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3822129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38221292013-11-11 A micro-architectural evaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implant placement in proximal femoral fractures Jenkins, Paul J Ramaesh, Rishikesan Pankaj, Pankaj Patton, James T Howie, Colin R Goffin, Jérôme M van der Merwe, Andrew Wallace, Robert J Porter, Daniel E Simpson, A Hamish Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The micro-architecture of bone has been increasingly recognized as an important determinant of bone strength. Successful operative stabilization of fractures depends on bone strength. We evaluated the osseous micro-architecture and strength of the osteoporotic human femoral head. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 6 femoral heads, obtained during arthroplasty surgery for femoral neck fracture, underwent micro-computed tomography (microCT) scanning at 30 μm, and bone volume ratio (BV/TV), trabecular thickness, structural model index, connection density, and degree of anisotropy for volumes of interest throughout the head were derived. A further 15 femoral heads underwent mechanical testing of compressive failure stress of cubes of trabecular bone from different regions of the head. RESULTS: The greatest density and trabecular thickness was found in the central core that extended from the medial calcar to the physeal scar. This region also correlated with the greatest degree of anisotropy and proportion of plate-like trabeculae. In the epiphyseal region, the trabeculae were organized radially from the physeal scar. The weakest area was found at the apex and peripheral areas of the head. The strongest region was at the center of the head. INTERPRETATION: The center of the femoral head contained the strongest trabecular bone, with the thickest, most dense trabeculae. The apical region was weaker. From an anatomical and mechanical point of view, implants that achieve fixation in or below this central core may achieve the most stable fixation during fracture healing. Informa Healthcare 2013-10 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3822129/ /pubmed/24032522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.842432 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Article
Jenkins, Paul J
Ramaesh, Rishikesan
Pankaj, Pankaj
Patton, James T
Howie, Colin R
Goffin, Jérôme M
van der Merwe, Andrew
Wallace, Robert J
Porter, Daniel E
Simpson, A Hamish
A micro-architectural evaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implant placement in proximal femoral fractures
title A micro-architectural evaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implant placement in proximal femoral fractures
title_full A micro-architectural evaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implant placement in proximal femoral fractures
title_fullStr A micro-architectural evaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implant placement in proximal femoral fractures
title_full_unstemmed A micro-architectural evaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implant placement in proximal femoral fractures
title_short A micro-architectural evaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implant placement in proximal femoral fractures
title_sort micro-architectural evaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implant placement in proximal femoral fractures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3822129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24032522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.842432
work_keys_str_mv AT jenkinspaulj amicroarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT ramaeshrishikesan amicroarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT pankajpankaj amicroarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT pattonjamest amicroarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT howiecolinr amicroarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT goffinjeromem amicroarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT vandermerweandrew amicroarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT wallacerobertj amicroarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT porterdaniele amicroarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT simpsonahamish amicroarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT jenkinspaulj microarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT ramaeshrishikesan microarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT pankajpankaj microarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT pattonjamest microarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT howiecolinr microarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT goffinjeromem microarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT vandermerweandrew microarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT wallacerobertj microarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT porterdaniele microarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures
AT simpsonahamish microarchitecturalevaluationofosteoporotichumanfemoralheadstoguideimplantplacementinproximalfemoralfractures