Cargando…

Humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis: Outcome related to glenoid erosion

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Humeral resurfacing has shown promising results for osteoarthritis, but revisions for glenoid erosion have been reported frequently. We investigated the hypothesis that preoperative glenoid wear and postoperative progress of glenoid erosion would influence the clinical outcom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Tomas, Gettmann, Andre, Wellmann, Mathias, Pastor, Frederic, Struck, Melena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3822131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24032525
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.838658
_version_ 1782290387616923648
author Smith, Tomas
Gettmann, Andre
Wellmann, Mathias
Pastor, Frederic
Struck, Melena
author_facet Smith, Tomas
Gettmann, Andre
Wellmann, Mathias
Pastor, Frederic
Struck, Melena
author_sort Smith, Tomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Humeral resurfacing has shown promising results for osteoarthritis, but revisions for glenoid erosion have been reported frequently. We investigated the hypothesis that preoperative glenoid wear and postoperative progress of glenoid erosion would influence the clinical outcome. METHODS: We reviewed 61 resurfacing hemiarthroplasties (55 patients) for primary osteoarthritis. 6 patients were lost to follow-up and 5 had undergone revision arthroplasty. This left 50 shoulders in 44 patients (mean age 66 years) that were followed for mean 30 (12–44) months. Complications, revisions, and the age- and sex-related Constant score were assessed. Radiographs were evaluated for loosening and glenoid erosion according to Walch. RESULTS: Of the 50 shoulders that were functionally assessed, the average age- and sex-related Constant score was 73%. In patients with preoperative type-B2 glenoids, at 49% it was lower than in type-A1 glenoids (81%, p = 0.03) and in type-B1 glenoids (84%, p = 0.02). The average age- and sex-related Constant score for patients with type-A2 glenoids (60%) was lower than for type-A1 and -B1 glenoids and higher than for type-B2 glenoids, but the differences were not statistically significant. In the total population of 61 shoulders, the radiographs showed postoperative glenoid erosion in 38 cases and no humeral prosthetic loosening. Revision arthroplasty was performed in 11 cases after 28 (7–69) months. The implant size had no statistically significant influence on the functional outcome. The size was considered to be adequate in 28 of the 50 functionally assessed shoulders. In 21 cases, the implant size was too large and in 1 case it was too small. INTERPRETATION: We found frequent postoperative glenoid erosion and a high rate of revision arthroplasty after humeral resurfacing for primary osteoarthritis. Oversizing of the implants was common, but it had no statistically significant influence on the functional outcome. Inferior results were found in the presence of increased eccentric preoperative glenoid wear. Total shoulder arthroplasty should be considered in these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3822131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38221312013-11-11 Humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis: Outcome related to glenoid erosion Smith, Tomas Gettmann, Andre Wellmann, Mathias Pastor, Frederic Struck, Melena Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Humeral resurfacing has shown promising results for osteoarthritis, but revisions for glenoid erosion have been reported frequently. We investigated the hypothesis that preoperative glenoid wear and postoperative progress of glenoid erosion would influence the clinical outcome. METHODS: We reviewed 61 resurfacing hemiarthroplasties (55 patients) for primary osteoarthritis. 6 patients were lost to follow-up and 5 had undergone revision arthroplasty. This left 50 shoulders in 44 patients (mean age 66 years) that were followed for mean 30 (12–44) months. Complications, revisions, and the age- and sex-related Constant score were assessed. Radiographs were evaluated for loosening and glenoid erosion according to Walch. RESULTS: Of the 50 shoulders that were functionally assessed, the average age- and sex-related Constant score was 73%. In patients with preoperative type-B2 glenoids, at 49% it was lower than in type-A1 glenoids (81%, p = 0.03) and in type-B1 glenoids (84%, p = 0.02). The average age- and sex-related Constant score for patients with type-A2 glenoids (60%) was lower than for type-A1 and -B1 glenoids and higher than for type-B2 glenoids, but the differences were not statistically significant. In the total population of 61 shoulders, the radiographs showed postoperative glenoid erosion in 38 cases and no humeral prosthetic loosening. Revision arthroplasty was performed in 11 cases after 28 (7–69) months. The implant size had no statistically significant influence on the functional outcome. The size was considered to be adequate in 28 of the 50 functionally assessed shoulders. In 21 cases, the implant size was too large and in 1 case it was too small. INTERPRETATION: We found frequent postoperative glenoid erosion and a high rate of revision arthroplasty after humeral resurfacing for primary osteoarthritis. Oversizing of the implants was common, but it had no statistically significant influence on the functional outcome. Inferior results were found in the presence of increased eccentric preoperative glenoid wear. Total shoulder arthroplasty should be considered in these patients. Informa Healthcare 2013-10 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3822131/ /pubmed/24032525 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.838658 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Article
Smith, Tomas
Gettmann, Andre
Wellmann, Mathias
Pastor, Frederic
Struck, Melena
Humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis: Outcome related to glenoid erosion
title Humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis: Outcome related to glenoid erosion
title_full Humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis: Outcome related to glenoid erosion
title_fullStr Humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis: Outcome related to glenoid erosion
title_full_unstemmed Humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis: Outcome related to glenoid erosion
title_short Humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis: Outcome related to glenoid erosion
title_sort humeral surface replacement for osteoarthritis: outcome related to glenoid erosion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3822131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24032525
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.838658
work_keys_str_mv AT smithtomas humeralsurfacereplacementforosteoarthritisoutcomerelatedtoglenoiderosion
AT gettmannandre humeralsurfacereplacementforosteoarthritisoutcomerelatedtoglenoiderosion
AT wellmannmathias humeralsurfacereplacementforosteoarthritisoutcomerelatedtoglenoiderosion
AT pastorfrederic humeralsurfacereplacementforosteoarthritisoutcomerelatedtoglenoiderosion
AT struckmelena humeralsurfacereplacementforosteoarthritisoutcomerelatedtoglenoiderosion