Cargando…

The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?

When periodic stimuli such as vertical sinewave gratings are presented to the two eyes, the initial stage of disparity estimation yields multiple solutions at multiple depths. The solutions are all frontoparallel when the sinewaves have the same spatial frequency; they are all slanted when the sinew...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vlaskamp, Björn N. S., Guan, Phillip, Banks, Martin S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3822326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273523
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00836
_version_ 1782290398359584768
author Vlaskamp, Björn N. S.
Guan, Phillip
Banks, Martin S.
author_facet Vlaskamp, Björn N. S.
Guan, Phillip
Banks, Martin S.
author_sort Vlaskamp, Björn N. S.
collection PubMed
description When periodic stimuli such as vertical sinewave gratings are presented to the two eyes, the initial stage of disparity estimation yields multiple solutions at multiple depths. The solutions are all frontoparallel when the sinewaves have the same spatial frequency; they are all slanted when the sinewaves have quite different frequencies. Despite multiple solutions, humans perceive only one depth in each visual direction: a single frontoparallel plane when the frequencies are the same and a series of small slanted planes—Venetian blinds—when the frequencies are quite different. These percepts are consistent with a preference for solutions that minimize absolute disparity or overall slant. The preference for minimum disparity and minimum slant are identical for gaze at zero eccentricity; we dissociated the predictions of the two by measuring the occurrence of Venetian blinds when the stimuli were viewed in eccentric gaze. The results were generally quite consistent with a zero-disparity preference (Experiment 1), but we also observed a shift toward a zero-slant preference when the edges of the stimulus had zero slant (Experiment 2). These observations provide useful insights into how the visual system constructs depth percepts from a multitude of possible depths.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3822326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38223262013-11-22 The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant? Vlaskamp, Björn N. S. Guan, Phillip Banks, Martin S. Front Psychol Psychology When periodic stimuli such as vertical sinewave gratings are presented to the two eyes, the initial stage of disparity estimation yields multiple solutions at multiple depths. The solutions are all frontoparallel when the sinewaves have the same spatial frequency; they are all slanted when the sinewaves have quite different frequencies. Despite multiple solutions, humans perceive only one depth in each visual direction: a single frontoparallel plane when the frequencies are the same and a series of small slanted planes—Venetian blinds—when the frequencies are quite different. These percepts are consistent with a preference for solutions that minimize absolute disparity or overall slant. The preference for minimum disparity and minimum slant are identical for gaze at zero eccentricity; we dissociated the predictions of the two by measuring the occurrence of Venetian blinds when the stimuli were viewed in eccentric gaze. The results were generally quite consistent with a zero-disparity preference (Experiment 1), but we also observed a shift toward a zero-slant preference when the edges of the stimulus had zero slant (Experiment 2). These observations provide useful insights into how the visual system constructs depth percepts from a multitude of possible depths. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3822326/ /pubmed/24273523 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00836 Text en Copyright © 2013 Vlaskamp, Guan and Banks. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Vlaskamp, Björn N. S.
Guan, Phillip
Banks, Martin S.
The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?
title The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?
title_full The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?
title_fullStr The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?
title_full_unstemmed The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?
title_short The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?
title_sort venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3822326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273523
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00836
work_keys_str_mv AT vlaskampbjornns thevenetianblindeffectapreferenceforzerodisparityorzeroslant
AT guanphillip thevenetianblindeffectapreferenceforzerodisparityorzeroslant
AT banksmartins thevenetianblindeffectapreferenceforzerodisparityorzeroslant
AT vlaskampbjornns venetianblindeffectapreferenceforzerodisparityorzeroslant
AT guanphillip venetianblindeffectapreferenceforzerodisparityorzeroslant
AT banksmartins venetianblindeffectapreferenceforzerodisparityorzeroslant