Cargando…

Controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention

Antiplatelet agents are a cornerstone in the treatment of acute arterial thrombotic events and in the prevention of thrombus formation. However, existing antiplatelet agents (mainly aspirin, the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole and clopidogrel) reduce the risk of vascular events only by about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Ralph, Diener, Hans-Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20738445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01162.x
_version_ 1782290519611670528
author Weber, Ralph
Diener, Hans-Christoph
author_facet Weber, Ralph
Diener, Hans-Christoph
author_sort Weber, Ralph
collection PubMed
description Antiplatelet agents are a cornerstone in the treatment of acute arterial thrombotic events and in the prevention of thrombus formation. However, existing antiplatelet agents (mainly aspirin, the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole and clopidogrel) reduce the risk of vascular events only by about one quarter compared with placebo. As a consequence, more efficacious antiplatelet therapies with a reduced bleeding risk are needed. We give an overview of several new antiplatelet agents that are currently investigated in secondary stroke prevention: adenosine 5′-diphosphonate receptor antagonists, cilostazol, sarpogrelate, terutroban and SCH 530348. There are unique features in secondary stroke prevention that have to be taken into account: ischaemic stroke is a heterogeneous disease caused by multiple aetiologies and the blood–brain barrier is disturbed after stroke which may result in a higher intracerebral bleeding risk. Several small randomized trials indicated that the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel might be superior to antiplatelet monotherapy in the acute and early post-ischaemic phase. There is an ongoing debate about antiplatelet resistance. Decreasing response to aspirin is correlated independently with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. However, there is still no evidence from randomized trials linking aspirin resistance and recurrent ischaemic events. Similarly, randomized trials have not demonstrated a clinical significantly decreased antiplatelet effect by the concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors. Nevertheless, a routine use of this drug combination is not recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3823155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38231552015-04-20 Controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention Weber, Ralph Diener, Hans-Christoph J Cell Mol Med Reviews Antiplatelet agents are a cornerstone in the treatment of acute arterial thrombotic events and in the prevention of thrombus formation. However, existing antiplatelet agents (mainly aspirin, the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole and clopidogrel) reduce the risk of vascular events only by about one quarter compared with placebo. As a consequence, more efficacious antiplatelet therapies with a reduced bleeding risk are needed. We give an overview of several new antiplatelet agents that are currently investigated in secondary stroke prevention: adenosine 5′-diphosphonate receptor antagonists, cilostazol, sarpogrelate, terutroban and SCH 530348. There are unique features in secondary stroke prevention that have to be taken into account: ischaemic stroke is a heterogeneous disease caused by multiple aetiologies and the blood–brain barrier is disturbed after stroke which may result in a higher intracerebral bleeding risk. Several small randomized trials indicated that the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel might be superior to antiplatelet monotherapy in the acute and early post-ischaemic phase. There is an ongoing debate about antiplatelet resistance. Decreasing response to aspirin is correlated independently with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. However, there is still no evidence from randomized trials linking aspirin resistance and recurrent ischaemic events. Similarly, randomized trials have not demonstrated a clinical significantly decreased antiplatelet effect by the concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors. Nevertheless, a routine use of this drug combination is not recommended. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010-10 2010-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3823155/ /pubmed/20738445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01162.x Text en © 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © 2010 Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine/Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Reviews
Weber, Ralph
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention
title Controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention
title_full Controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention
title_fullStr Controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention
title_full_unstemmed Controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention
title_short Controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention
title_sort controversies and future perspectives of antiplatelet therapy in secondary stroke prevention
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20738445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01162.x
work_keys_str_mv AT weberralph controversiesandfutureperspectivesofantiplatelettherapyinsecondarystrokeprevention
AT dienerhanschristoph controversiesandfutureperspectivesofantiplatelettherapyinsecondarystrokeprevention