Cargando…

Can Probiotics Improve the Environmental Microbiome and Resistome of Commercial Poultry Production?

Food animal production systems have become more consolidated and integrated, producing large, concentrated animal populations and significant amounts of fecal waste. Increasing use of manure and litter as a more “natural” and affordable source of fertilizer may be contributing to contamination of fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedroso, Adriana A., Hurley-Bacon, Anne L., Zedek, Andrea S., Kwan, Tiffany W., Jordan, Andrea P. O., Avellaneda, Gloria, Hofacre, Charles L., Oakley, Brian B., Collett, Stephen R., Maurer, John J., Lee, Margie D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24071920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10104534
_version_ 1782290551826022400
author Pedroso, Adriana A.
Hurley-Bacon, Anne L.
Zedek, Andrea S.
Kwan, Tiffany W.
Jordan, Andrea P. O.
Avellaneda, Gloria
Hofacre, Charles L.
Oakley, Brian B.
Collett, Stephen R.
Maurer, John J.
Lee, Margie D.
author_facet Pedroso, Adriana A.
Hurley-Bacon, Anne L.
Zedek, Andrea S.
Kwan, Tiffany W.
Jordan, Andrea P. O.
Avellaneda, Gloria
Hofacre, Charles L.
Oakley, Brian B.
Collett, Stephen R.
Maurer, John J.
Lee, Margie D.
author_sort Pedroso, Adriana A.
collection PubMed
description Food animal production systems have become more consolidated and integrated, producing large, concentrated animal populations and significant amounts of fecal waste. Increasing use of manure and litter as a more “natural” and affordable source of fertilizer may be contributing to contamination of fruits and vegetables with foodborne pathogens. In addition, human and animal manure have been identified as a significant source of antibiotic resistance genes thereby serving as a disseminator of resistance to soil and waterways. Therefore, identifying methods to remediate human and animal waste is critical in developing strategies to improve food safety and minimize the dissemination of antibiotic resistant bacteria. In this study, we sought to determine whether withdrawing antibiotic growth promoters or using alternatives to antibiotics would reduce the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes or prevalence of pathogens in poultry litter. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) paired with high throughput sequencing was used to evaluate the bacterial community composition of litter from broiler chickens that were treated with streptogramin growth-promoting antibiotics, probiotics, or prebiotics. The prevalence of resistance genes and pathogens was determined from sequencing results or PCR screens of litter community DNA. Streptogramin antibiotic usage did not elicit statistically significant differences in Shannon diversity indices or correlation coefficients among the flocks. However, T-RFLP revealed that there were inter-farm differences in the litter composition that was independent of antibiotic usage. The litter from all farms, regardless of antibiotic usage, contained streptogramin resistance genes (vatA, vatB, and vatE), macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance genes (ermA and ermB), the tetracycline resistance gene tetM and class 1 integrons. There was inter-farm variability in the distribution of vatA and vatE with no statistically significant differences with regards to usage. Bacterial diversity was higher in litter when probiotics or prebiotics were administered to flocks but as the litter aged, diversity decreased. No statistically signficant differences were detected in the abundance of class 1 integrons where 3%–5% of the community was estimated to harbor a copy. Abundance of pathogenic Clostridium species increased in aging litter despite the treatment while the abundance of tetracycline-resistant coliforms was unaffected by treatment. However some treatments decreased the prevalence of Salmonella. These findings suggest that withdrawing antibiotics or administering alternatives to antibiotics can change the litter bacterial community and reduce the prevalence of some pathogenic bacteria, but may not immediately impact the prevalence of antibiotic resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3823317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38233172013-11-11 Can Probiotics Improve the Environmental Microbiome and Resistome of Commercial Poultry Production? Pedroso, Adriana A. Hurley-Bacon, Anne L. Zedek, Andrea S. Kwan, Tiffany W. Jordan, Andrea P. O. Avellaneda, Gloria Hofacre, Charles L. Oakley, Brian B. Collett, Stephen R. Maurer, John J. Lee, Margie D. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Food animal production systems have become more consolidated and integrated, producing large, concentrated animal populations and significant amounts of fecal waste. Increasing use of manure and litter as a more “natural” and affordable source of fertilizer may be contributing to contamination of fruits and vegetables with foodborne pathogens. In addition, human and animal manure have been identified as a significant source of antibiotic resistance genes thereby serving as a disseminator of resistance to soil and waterways. Therefore, identifying methods to remediate human and animal waste is critical in developing strategies to improve food safety and minimize the dissemination of antibiotic resistant bacteria. In this study, we sought to determine whether withdrawing antibiotic growth promoters or using alternatives to antibiotics would reduce the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes or prevalence of pathogens in poultry litter. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) paired with high throughput sequencing was used to evaluate the bacterial community composition of litter from broiler chickens that were treated with streptogramin growth-promoting antibiotics, probiotics, or prebiotics. The prevalence of resistance genes and pathogens was determined from sequencing results or PCR screens of litter community DNA. Streptogramin antibiotic usage did not elicit statistically significant differences in Shannon diversity indices or correlation coefficients among the flocks. However, T-RFLP revealed that there were inter-farm differences in the litter composition that was independent of antibiotic usage. The litter from all farms, regardless of antibiotic usage, contained streptogramin resistance genes (vatA, vatB, and vatE), macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance genes (ermA and ermB), the tetracycline resistance gene tetM and class 1 integrons. There was inter-farm variability in the distribution of vatA and vatE with no statistically significant differences with regards to usage. Bacterial diversity was higher in litter when probiotics or prebiotics were administered to flocks but as the litter aged, diversity decreased. No statistically signficant differences were detected in the abundance of class 1 integrons where 3%–5% of the community was estimated to harbor a copy. Abundance of pathogenic Clostridium species increased in aging litter despite the treatment while the abundance of tetracycline-resistant coliforms was unaffected by treatment. However some treatments decreased the prevalence of Salmonella. These findings suggest that withdrawing antibiotics or administering alternatives to antibiotics can change the litter bacterial community and reduce the prevalence of some pathogenic bacteria, but may not immediately impact the prevalence of antibiotic resistance. MDPI 2013-09-25 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3823317/ /pubmed/24071920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10104534 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pedroso, Adriana A.
Hurley-Bacon, Anne L.
Zedek, Andrea S.
Kwan, Tiffany W.
Jordan, Andrea P. O.
Avellaneda, Gloria
Hofacre, Charles L.
Oakley, Brian B.
Collett, Stephen R.
Maurer, John J.
Lee, Margie D.
Can Probiotics Improve the Environmental Microbiome and Resistome of Commercial Poultry Production?
title Can Probiotics Improve the Environmental Microbiome and Resistome of Commercial Poultry Production?
title_full Can Probiotics Improve the Environmental Microbiome and Resistome of Commercial Poultry Production?
title_fullStr Can Probiotics Improve the Environmental Microbiome and Resistome of Commercial Poultry Production?
title_full_unstemmed Can Probiotics Improve the Environmental Microbiome and Resistome of Commercial Poultry Production?
title_short Can Probiotics Improve the Environmental Microbiome and Resistome of Commercial Poultry Production?
title_sort can probiotics improve the environmental microbiome and resistome of commercial poultry production?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24071920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10104534
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrosoadrianaa canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction
AT hurleybaconannel canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction
AT zedekandreas canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction
AT kwantiffanyw canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction
AT jordanandreapo canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction
AT avellanedagloria canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction
AT hofacrecharlesl canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction
AT oakleybrianb canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction
AT collettstephenr canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction
AT maurerjohnj canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction
AT leemargied canprobioticsimprovetheenvironmentalmicrobiomeandresistomeofcommercialpoultryproduction