Cargando…

A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chinese Elderly Population

BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Chinese elderly population. METHODS: A total of 668 Chinese elderly participants, including the development cohort (n = 433), the validation cohort (n = 235) were enrolled. The new equation using the gene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xun, Wang, Yanni, Wang, Cheng, Shi, Chenggang, Cheng, Cailian, Chen, Jinxia, Ma, Huijuan, Lv, Linsheng, Li, Lin, Lou, Tanqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079675
_version_ 1782290587171422208
author Liu, Xun
Wang, Yanni
Wang, Cheng
Shi, Chenggang
Cheng, Cailian
Chen, Jinxia
Ma, Huijuan
Lv, Linsheng
Li, Lin
Lou, Tanqi
author_facet Liu, Xun
Wang, Yanni
Wang, Cheng
Shi, Chenggang
Cheng, Cailian
Chen, Jinxia
Ma, Huijuan
Lv, Linsheng
Li, Lin
Lou, Tanqi
author_sort Liu, Xun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Chinese elderly population. METHODS: A total of 668 Chinese elderly participants, including the development cohort (n = 433), the validation cohort (n = 235) were enrolled. The new equation using the generalized additive model, and age, gender, serum creatinine as predictor variables was developed and the performances was compared with the CKD-EPI equation. RESULTS: In the validation data set, both bias and precision were improved with the new equation, as compared with the CKD-EPI equation (median difference, −1.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 7.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2) for the new equation and the CKD-EPI equation, [P<0.001]; interquartile range [IQR] for the difference, 16.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 19.0 ml/min/1.73 m(2) [P<0.001]), as were accuracies (15% accuracy, 40.4% vs. 30.6% [P = 0.02]; 30% accuracy, 71.1% vs. 47.2%, [P<0.001]; 50% accuracy, 90.2% vs. 75.7%, [P<0.001]), allowing improvement in GFR categorization (GFR category misclassification rate, 37.4% vs. 53.2% [P = <0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: A new equation was developed in Chinese elderly population. In the validation data set, the new equation performed better than the original CKD-EPI equation. The new equation needs further external validations. Calibration of the GFR referent standard to a more accurate one should be an useful way to improve the performance of GFR estimating equations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3823564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38235642013-11-15 A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chinese Elderly Population Liu, Xun Wang, Yanni Wang, Cheng Shi, Chenggang Cheng, Cailian Chen, Jinxia Ma, Huijuan Lv, Linsheng Li, Lin Lou, Tanqi PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Chinese elderly population. METHODS: A total of 668 Chinese elderly participants, including the development cohort (n = 433), the validation cohort (n = 235) were enrolled. The new equation using the generalized additive model, and age, gender, serum creatinine as predictor variables was developed and the performances was compared with the CKD-EPI equation. RESULTS: In the validation data set, both bias and precision were improved with the new equation, as compared with the CKD-EPI equation (median difference, −1.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 7.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2) for the new equation and the CKD-EPI equation, [P<0.001]; interquartile range [IQR] for the difference, 16.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 19.0 ml/min/1.73 m(2) [P<0.001]), as were accuracies (15% accuracy, 40.4% vs. 30.6% [P = 0.02]; 30% accuracy, 71.1% vs. 47.2%, [P<0.001]; 50% accuracy, 90.2% vs. 75.7%, [P<0.001]), allowing improvement in GFR categorization (GFR category misclassification rate, 37.4% vs. 53.2% [P = <0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: A new equation was developed in Chinese elderly population. In the validation data set, the new equation performed better than the original CKD-EPI equation. The new equation needs further external validations. Calibration of the GFR referent standard to a more accurate one should be an useful way to improve the performance of GFR estimating equations. Public Library of Science 2013-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3823564/ /pubmed/24244543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079675 Text en © 2013 Liu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Xun
Wang, Yanni
Wang, Cheng
Shi, Chenggang
Cheng, Cailian
Chen, Jinxia
Ma, Huijuan
Lv, Linsheng
Li, Lin
Lou, Tanqi
A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chinese Elderly Population
title A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chinese Elderly Population
title_full A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chinese Elderly Population
title_fullStr A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chinese Elderly Population
title_full_unstemmed A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chinese Elderly Population
title_short A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chinese Elderly Population
title_sort new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate in chinese elderly population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079675
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxun anewequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT wangyanni anewequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT wangcheng anewequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT shichenggang anewequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT chengcailian anewequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT chenjinxia anewequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT mahuijuan anewequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT lvlinsheng anewequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT lilin anewequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT loutanqi anewequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT liuxun newequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT wangyanni newequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT wangcheng newequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT shichenggang newequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT chengcailian newequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT chenjinxia newequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT mahuijuan newequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT lvlinsheng newequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT lilin newequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation
AT loutanqi newequationtoestimateglomerularfiltrationrateinchineseelderlypopulation