Cargando…

Randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs accelerated hyperfractionation with concomitant boost (CCB) as a primary treatment for patients with Stage III–IV squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). A total of 85 non-metastatic adva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chitapanarux, Imjai, Tharavichitkul, Ekkasit, Kamnerdsupaphon, Pimkhuan, Pukanhapan, Nantaka, Vongtama, Roy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23740894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt054
_version_ 1782290611254067200
author Chitapanarux, Imjai
Tharavichitkul, Ekkasit
Kamnerdsupaphon, Pimkhuan
Pukanhapan, Nantaka
Vongtama, Roy
author_facet Chitapanarux, Imjai
Tharavichitkul, Ekkasit
Kamnerdsupaphon, Pimkhuan
Pukanhapan, Nantaka
Vongtama, Roy
author_sort Chitapanarux, Imjai
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs accelerated hyperfractionation with concomitant boost (CCB) as a primary treatment for patients with Stage III–IV squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). A total of 85 non-metastatic advanced SCCHN patients were accrued from January 2003 to December 2007. Of these, 48 and 37 patients received CCRT and CCB, respectively. The patients were randomized to receive either three cycles of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil plus conventional radiotherapy (CCRT, 66 Gy in 6.5 weeks) or hybrid accelerated radiotherapy (CCB, 70 Gy in 6 weeks). The primary endpoint was determined by locoregional control rate. The secondary endpoints were overall survival and toxicity. With a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 3–102), the 5-year locoregional control rate was 69.6% in the CCRT arm vs 55.0% in the CCB arm (P = 0.184). The 5-year overall survival rate was marginally significantly different (P = 0.05): 76.1% in the CCRT arm vs 63.5% in the CCB arm. Radiotherapy treatment interruptions of more than three days were 60.4% and 40.5% in the CCRT arm and CCB arm, respectively. The median total treatment time was 55.5 days in the CCRT arm and 49 days in the CCB arm. The rate of Grade 3–4 acute mucositis was significantly higher in the CCB arm (67.6% vs 41.7%, P = 0.01), but no high grade hematologic toxicities were found in the CCB arm (27.2% vs 0%). CCRT has shown a trend of improving outcome over CCB irradiation in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3823777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38237772013-11-12 Randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer Chitapanarux, Imjai Tharavichitkul, Ekkasit Kamnerdsupaphon, Pimkhuan Pukanhapan, Nantaka Vongtama, Roy J Radiat Res Oncology The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs accelerated hyperfractionation with concomitant boost (CCB) as a primary treatment for patients with Stage III–IV squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). A total of 85 non-metastatic advanced SCCHN patients were accrued from January 2003 to December 2007. Of these, 48 and 37 patients received CCRT and CCB, respectively. The patients were randomized to receive either three cycles of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil plus conventional radiotherapy (CCRT, 66 Gy in 6.5 weeks) or hybrid accelerated radiotherapy (CCB, 70 Gy in 6 weeks). The primary endpoint was determined by locoregional control rate. The secondary endpoints were overall survival and toxicity. With a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 3–102), the 5-year locoregional control rate was 69.6% in the CCRT arm vs 55.0% in the CCB arm (P = 0.184). The 5-year overall survival rate was marginally significantly different (P = 0.05): 76.1% in the CCRT arm vs 63.5% in the CCB arm. Radiotherapy treatment interruptions of more than three days were 60.4% and 40.5% in the CCRT arm and CCB arm, respectively. The median total treatment time was 55.5 days in the CCRT arm and 49 days in the CCB arm. The rate of Grade 3–4 acute mucositis was significantly higher in the CCB arm (67.6% vs 41.7%, P = 0.01), but no high grade hematologic toxicities were found in the CCB arm (27.2% vs 0%). CCRT has shown a trend of improving outcome over CCB irradiation in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer. Oxford University Press 2013-11 2013-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3823777/ /pubmed/23740894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt054 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Chitapanarux, Imjai
Tharavichitkul, Ekkasit
Kamnerdsupaphon, Pimkhuan
Pukanhapan, Nantaka
Vongtama, Roy
Randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer
title Randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer
title_full Randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer
title_fullStr Randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer
title_short Randomized phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer
title_sort randomized phase iii trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs accelerated hyperfractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23740894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt054
work_keys_str_mv AT chitapanaruximjai randomizedphaseiiitrialofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyvsacceleratedhyperfractionationradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT tharavichitkulekkasit randomizedphaseiiitrialofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyvsacceleratedhyperfractionationradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT kamnerdsupaphonpimkhuan randomizedphaseiiitrialofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyvsacceleratedhyperfractionationradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT pukanhapannantaka randomizedphaseiiitrialofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyvsacceleratedhyperfractionationradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT vongtamaroy randomizedphaseiiitrialofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyvsacceleratedhyperfractionationradiotherapyinlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer