Cargando…

Proteomic Differences between Tellurite-Sensitive and Tellurite–Resistant E.coli

Tellurite containing compounds are in use for industrial processes and increasing delivery into the environment generates specific pollution that may well result in contamination and subsequent potential adverse effects on public health. It was the aim of the current study to reveal mechanism of tox...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aradská, Jana, Šmidák, Roman, Turkovičová, Lenka, Turňa, Ján, Lubec, Gert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078010
_version_ 1782290626570616832
author Aradská, Jana
Šmidák, Roman
Turkovičová, Lenka
Turňa, Ján
Lubec, Gert
author_facet Aradská, Jana
Šmidák, Roman
Turkovičová, Lenka
Turňa, Ján
Lubec, Gert
author_sort Aradská, Jana
collection PubMed
description Tellurite containing compounds are in use for industrial processes and increasing delivery into the environment generates specific pollution that may well result in contamination and subsequent potential adverse effects on public health. It was the aim of the current study to reveal mechanism of toxicity in tellurite-sensitive and tellurite-resistant E. coli at the protein level. In this work an approach using gel-based mass spectrometrical analysis to identify a differential protein profile related to tellurite toxicity was used and the mechanism of ter operon-mediated tellurite resistance was addressed. E. coli BL21 was genetically manipulated for tellurite-resistance by the introduction of the resistance-conferring ter genes on the pLK18 plasmid. Potassium tellurite was added to cultures in order to obtain a final 3.9 micromolar concentration. Proteins from tellurite-sensitive and tellurite-resistant E. coli were run on 2-D gel electrophoresis, spots of interest were picked, in-gel digested and subsequently analysed by nano-LC-MS/MS (ion trap). In addition, Western blotting and measurement of enzymatic activity were performed to verify the expression of certain candidate proteins. Following exposure to tellurite, in contrast to tellurite-resistant bacteria, sensitive cells exhibited increased levels of antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutases, catalase and oxidoreductase YqhD. Cysteine desulfurase, known to be related to tellurite toxicity as well as proteins involved in protein folding: GroEL, DnaK and EF-Tu were upregulated in sensitive cells. In resistant bacteria, several isoforms of four essential Ter proteins were observed and following tellurite treatment the abovementioned protein levels did not show any significant proteome changes as compared to the sensitive control. The absence of general defense mechanisms against tellurite toxicity in resistant bacteria thus provides further evidence that the four proteins of the ter operon function by a specific mode of action in the mechanism of tellurite resistance probably involving protein cascades from antioxidant and protein folding pathways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3823874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38238742013-11-15 Proteomic Differences between Tellurite-Sensitive and Tellurite–Resistant E.coli Aradská, Jana Šmidák, Roman Turkovičová, Lenka Turňa, Ján Lubec, Gert PLoS One Research Article Tellurite containing compounds are in use for industrial processes and increasing delivery into the environment generates specific pollution that may well result in contamination and subsequent potential adverse effects on public health. It was the aim of the current study to reveal mechanism of toxicity in tellurite-sensitive and tellurite-resistant E. coli at the protein level. In this work an approach using gel-based mass spectrometrical analysis to identify a differential protein profile related to tellurite toxicity was used and the mechanism of ter operon-mediated tellurite resistance was addressed. E. coli BL21 was genetically manipulated for tellurite-resistance by the introduction of the resistance-conferring ter genes on the pLK18 plasmid. Potassium tellurite was added to cultures in order to obtain a final 3.9 micromolar concentration. Proteins from tellurite-sensitive and tellurite-resistant E. coli were run on 2-D gel electrophoresis, spots of interest were picked, in-gel digested and subsequently analysed by nano-LC-MS/MS (ion trap). In addition, Western blotting and measurement of enzymatic activity were performed to verify the expression of certain candidate proteins. Following exposure to tellurite, in contrast to tellurite-resistant bacteria, sensitive cells exhibited increased levels of antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutases, catalase and oxidoreductase YqhD. Cysteine desulfurase, known to be related to tellurite toxicity as well as proteins involved in protein folding: GroEL, DnaK and EF-Tu were upregulated in sensitive cells. In resistant bacteria, several isoforms of four essential Ter proteins were observed and following tellurite treatment the abovementioned protein levels did not show any significant proteome changes as compared to the sensitive control. The absence of general defense mechanisms against tellurite toxicity in resistant bacteria thus provides further evidence that the four proteins of the ter operon function by a specific mode of action in the mechanism of tellurite resistance probably involving protein cascades from antioxidant and protein folding pathways. Public Library of Science 2013-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3823874/ /pubmed/24244285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078010 Text en © 2013 Aradská et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aradská, Jana
Šmidák, Roman
Turkovičová, Lenka
Turňa, Ján
Lubec, Gert
Proteomic Differences between Tellurite-Sensitive and Tellurite–Resistant E.coli
title Proteomic Differences between Tellurite-Sensitive and Tellurite–Resistant E.coli
title_full Proteomic Differences between Tellurite-Sensitive and Tellurite–Resistant E.coli
title_fullStr Proteomic Differences between Tellurite-Sensitive and Tellurite–Resistant E.coli
title_full_unstemmed Proteomic Differences between Tellurite-Sensitive and Tellurite–Resistant E.coli
title_short Proteomic Differences between Tellurite-Sensitive and Tellurite–Resistant E.coli
title_sort proteomic differences between tellurite-sensitive and tellurite–resistant e.coli
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078010
work_keys_str_mv AT aradskajana proteomicdifferencesbetweentelluritesensitiveandtelluriteresistantecoli
AT smidakroman proteomicdifferencesbetweentelluritesensitiveandtelluriteresistantecoli
AT turkovicovalenka proteomicdifferencesbetweentelluritesensitiveandtelluriteresistantecoli
AT turnajan proteomicdifferencesbetweentelluritesensitiveandtelluriteresistantecoli
AT lubecgert proteomicdifferencesbetweentelluritesensitiveandtelluriteresistantecoli