Cargando…

Impact of Procedural Steps and Cryopreservation Agents in the Cryopreservation of Chlorophyte Microalgae

The maintenance of traditional microalgae collections based on liquid and solid media is labour intensive, costly and subject to contamination and genetic drift. Cryopreservation is therefore the method of choice for the maintenance of microalgae culture collections, but success is limited for many...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bui, Tony V. L., Ross, Ian L., Jakob, Gisela, Hankamer, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078668
_version_ 1782290628576542720
author Bui, Tony V. L.
Ross, Ian L.
Jakob, Gisela
Hankamer, Ben
author_facet Bui, Tony V. L.
Ross, Ian L.
Jakob, Gisela
Hankamer, Ben
author_sort Bui, Tony V. L.
collection PubMed
description The maintenance of traditional microalgae collections based on liquid and solid media is labour intensive, costly and subject to contamination and genetic drift. Cryopreservation is therefore the method of choice for the maintenance of microalgae culture collections, but success is limited for many species. Although the mechanisms underlying cryopreservation are understood in general, many technical variations are present in the literature and the impact of these are not always elaborated. This study describes two-step cryopreservation processes in which 3 microalgae strains representing different cell sizes were subjected to various experimental approaches to cryopreservation, the aim being to investigate mechanistic factors affecting cell viability. Sucrose and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were used as cryoprotectants. They were found to have a synergistic effect in the recovery of cryopreserved samples of many algal strains, with 6.5% being the optimum DMSO concentration. The effect of sucrose was shown to be due to improved cell survival and recovery after thawing by comparing the effect of sucrose on cell viability before or after cryopreservation. Additional factors with a beneficial effect on recovery were the elimination of centrifugation steps (minimizing cell damage), the reduction of cell concentration (which is proposed to reduce the generation of toxic cell wall components) and the use of low light levels during the recovery phase (proposed to reduce photooxidative damage). The use of the best conditions for each of these variables yielded an improved protocol which allowed the recovery and subsequent improved culture viability of a further 16 randomly chosen microalgae strains. These isolates included species from Chlorellaceae, Palmellaceae, Tetrasporaceae, Palmellopsis, Scenedesmaceae and Chlamydomonadaceae that differed greatly in cell diameter (3–50 µm), a variable that can affect cryopreservation success. The collective improvement of each of these parameters yielded a cryopreservation protocol that can be applied to a broad range of microalgae.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3823882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38238822013-11-15 Impact of Procedural Steps and Cryopreservation Agents in the Cryopreservation of Chlorophyte Microalgae Bui, Tony V. L. Ross, Ian L. Jakob, Gisela Hankamer, Ben PLoS One Research Article The maintenance of traditional microalgae collections based on liquid and solid media is labour intensive, costly and subject to contamination and genetic drift. Cryopreservation is therefore the method of choice for the maintenance of microalgae culture collections, but success is limited for many species. Although the mechanisms underlying cryopreservation are understood in general, many technical variations are present in the literature and the impact of these are not always elaborated. This study describes two-step cryopreservation processes in which 3 microalgae strains representing different cell sizes were subjected to various experimental approaches to cryopreservation, the aim being to investigate mechanistic factors affecting cell viability. Sucrose and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were used as cryoprotectants. They were found to have a synergistic effect in the recovery of cryopreserved samples of many algal strains, with 6.5% being the optimum DMSO concentration. The effect of sucrose was shown to be due to improved cell survival and recovery after thawing by comparing the effect of sucrose on cell viability before or after cryopreservation. Additional factors with a beneficial effect on recovery were the elimination of centrifugation steps (minimizing cell damage), the reduction of cell concentration (which is proposed to reduce the generation of toxic cell wall components) and the use of low light levels during the recovery phase (proposed to reduce photooxidative damage). The use of the best conditions for each of these variables yielded an improved protocol which allowed the recovery and subsequent improved culture viability of a further 16 randomly chosen microalgae strains. These isolates included species from Chlorellaceae, Palmellaceae, Tetrasporaceae, Palmellopsis, Scenedesmaceae and Chlamydomonadaceae that differed greatly in cell diameter (3–50 µm), a variable that can affect cryopreservation success. The collective improvement of each of these parameters yielded a cryopreservation protocol that can be applied to a broad range of microalgae. Public Library of Science 2013-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3823882/ /pubmed/24244336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078668 Text en © 2013 Bui et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bui, Tony V. L.
Ross, Ian L.
Jakob, Gisela
Hankamer, Ben
Impact of Procedural Steps and Cryopreservation Agents in the Cryopreservation of Chlorophyte Microalgae
title Impact of Procedural Steps and Cryopreservation Agents in the Cryopreservation of Chlorophyte Microalgae
title_full Impact of Procedural Steps and Cryopreservation Agents in the Cryopreservation of Chlorophyte Microalgae
title_fullStr Impact of Procedural Steps and Cryopreservation Agents in the Cryopreservation of Chlorophyte Microalgae
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Procedural Steps and Cryopreservation Agents in the Cryopreservation of Chlorophyte Microalgae
title_short Impact of Procedural Steps and Cryopreservation Agents in the Cryopreservation of Chlorophyte Microalgae
title_sort impact of procedural steps and cryopreservation agents in the cryopreservation of chlorophyte microalgae
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078668
work_keys_str_mv AT buitonyvl impactofproceduralstepsandcryopreservationagentsinthecryopreservationofchlorophytemicroalgae
AT rossianl impactofproceduralstepsandcryopreservationagentsinthecryopreservationofchlorophytemicroalgae
AT jakobgisela impactofproceduralstepsandcryopreservationagentsinthecryopreservationofchlorophytemicroalgae
AT hankamerben impactofproceduralstepsandcryopreservationagentsinthecryopreservationofchlorophytemicroalgae