Cargando…
MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem?
OBJECTIVE: Accurate identification and localization of cortical gray matter (CGM) lesions in MS is important when determining their clinical relevance. Double inversion recovery (DIR) scans have been widely used to detect MS CGM lesions. Phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) scans have a higher...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078879 |
_version_ | 1782290646081470464 |
---|---|
author | Sethi, Varun Muhlert, Nils Ron, Maria Golay, Xavier Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A. Miller, David H. Chard, Declan T. Yousry, Tarek A. |
author_facet | Sethi, Varun Muhlert, Nils Ron, Maria Golay, Xavier Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A. Miller, David H. Chard, Declan T. Yousry, Tarek A. |
author_sort | Sethi, Varun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Accurate identification and localization of cortical gray matter (CGM) lesions in MS is important when determining their clinical relevance. Double inversion recovery (DIR) scans have been widely used to detect MS CGM lesions. Phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) scans have a higher signal to noise, and can therefore be obtained at a higher resolution within clinically acceptable times. This enables detection of more CGM lesions depicting a clearer cortical and juxtacortical anatomy. In this study, we systematically investigated if the use of high resolution PSIR scans changes the classification of CGM lesions, when compared with standard resolution DIR scans. METHODS: 60 patients [30 RR(Relapsing remitting) and 15 each with PP(Primary progressive) and SP(Secondary progressive) MS] were scanned on a 3T Philips Achieva MRI scanner. Images acquired included DIR (1×1×3 mm resolution) and PSIR (0.5×0.5×2 mm). CGM lesions were detected and classified on DIR as intracortical (IC) or leucocortical (LC). We then examined these lesions on corresponding slices of the high resolution PSIR scans and categorized them as IC, LC, Juxtacortical white matter (JC-WM, abutting but not entering cortex) and other white matter (WM, not juxtacortical). Classifications using both scans were noted. RESULTS: 282 IC and 483 LC were identified on DIR. Of the IC lesions, 61% were confirmed as IC on PSIR, 35.5% were reclassified as LC and 3.5% as JC-WM or other WM only. Of the LC DIR lesions, 43.9% were confirmed at LC on PSIR, 16.1% were reclassified as IC and 40% as JC-WM or other WM only. Overall, 50% (381/765) of CGM lesions seen on DIR were reclassified, and 26.5% (203/765) affected WM only. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with higher resolution PSIR, a significant proportion of lesions classified as involving CGM on DIR appear to either contain more white matter than expected or to not involve CGM at all. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3823986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38239862013-11-15 MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem? Sethi, Varun Muhlert, Nils Ron, Maria Golay, Xavier Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A. Miller, David H. Chard, Declan T. Yousry, Tarek A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Accurate identification and localization of cortical gray matter (CGM) lesions in MS is important when determining their clinical relevance. Double inversion recovery (DIR) scans have been widely used to detect MS CGM lesions. Phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) scans have a higher signal to noise, and can therefore be obtained at a higher resolution within clinically acceptable times. This enables detection of more CGM lesions depicting a clearer cortical and juxtacortical anatomy. In this study, we systematically investigated if the use of high resolution PSIR scans changes the classification of CGM lesions, when compared with standard resolution DIR scans. METHODS: 60 patients [30 RR(Relapsing remitting) and 15 each with PP(Primary progressive) and SP(Secondary progressive) MS] were scanned on a 3T Philips Achieva MRI scanner. Images acquired included DIR (1×1×3 mm resolution) and PSIR (0.5×0.5×2 mm). CGM lesions were detected and classified on DIR as intracortical (IC) or leucocortical (LC). We then examined these lesions on corresponding slices of the high resolution PSIR scans and categorized them as IC, LC, Juxtacortical white matter (JC-WM, abutting but not entering cortex) and other white matter (WM, not juxtacortical). Classifications using both scans were noted. RESULTS: 282 IC and 483 LC were identified on DIR. Of the IC lesions, 61% were confirmed as IC on PSIR, 35.5% were reclassified as LC and 3.5% as JC-WM or other WM only. Of the LC DIR lesions, 43.9% were confirmed at LC on PSIR, 16.1% were reclassified as IC and 40% as JC-WM or other WM only. Overall, 50% (381/765) of CGM lesions seen on DIR were reclassified, and 26.5% (203/765) affected WM only. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with higher resolution PSIR, a significant proportion of lesions classified as involving CGM on DIR appear to either contain more white matter than expected or to not involve CGM at all. Public Library of Science 2013-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3823986/ /pubmed/24244381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078879 Text en © 2013 Sethi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sethi, Varun Muhlert, Nils Ron, Maria Golay, Xavier Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A. Miller, David H. Chard, Declan T. Yousry, Tarek A. MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem? |
title | MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem? |
title_full | MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem? |
title_fullStr | MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem? |
title_full_unstemmed | MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem? |
title_short | MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem? |
title_sort | ms cortical lesions on dir: not quite what they seem? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sethivarun mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem AT muhlertnils mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem AT ronmaria mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem AT golayxavier mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem AT wheelerkingshottclaudiaa mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem AT millerdavidh mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem AT charddeclant mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem AT yousrytareka mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem |