Cargando…

MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem?

OBJECTIVE: Accurate identification and localization of cortical gray matter (CGM) lesions in MS is important when determining their clinical relevance. Double inversion recovery (DIR) scans have been widely used to detect MS CGM lesions. Phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) scans have a higher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sethi, Varun, Muhlert, Nils, Ron, Maria, Golay, Xavier, Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A., Miller, David H., Chard, Declan T., Yousry, Tarek A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078879
_version_ 1782290646081470464
author Sethi, Varun
Muhlert, Nils
Ron, Maria
Golay, Xavier
Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A.
Miller, David H.
Chard, Declan T.
Yousry, Tarek A.
author_facet Sethi, Varun
Muhlert, Nils
Ron, Maria
Golay, Xavier
Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A.
Miller, David H.
Chard, Declan T.
Yousry, Tarek A.
author_sort Sethi, Varun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Accurate identification and localization of cortical gray matter (CGM) lesions in MS is important when determining their clinical relevance. Double inversion recovery (DIR) scans have been widely used to detect MS CGM lesions. Phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) scans have a higher signal to noise, and can therefore be obtained at a higher resolution within clinically acceptable times. This enables detection of more CGM lesions depicting a clearer cortical and juxtacortical anatomy. In this study, we systematically investigated if the use of high resolution PSIR scans changes the classification of CGM lesions, when compared with standard resolution DIR scans. METHODS: 60 patients [30 RR(Relapsing remitting) and 15 each with PP(Primary progressive) and SP(Secondary progressive) MS] were scanned on a 3T Philips Achieva MRI scanner. Images acquired included DIR (1×1×3 mm resolution) and PSIR (0.5×0.5×2 mm). CGM lesions were detected and classified on DIR as intracortical (IC) or leucocortical (LC). We then examined these lesions on corresponding slices of the high resolution PSIR scans and categorized them as IC, LC, Juxtacortical white matter (JC-WM, abutting but not entering cortex) and other white matter (WM, not juxtacortical). Classifications using both scans were noted. RESULTS: 282 IC and 483 LC were identified on DIR. Of the IC lesions, 61% were confirmed as IC on PSIR, 35.5% were reclassified as LC and 3.5% as JC-WM or other WM only. Of the LC DIR lesions, 43.9% were confirmed at LC on PSIR, 16.1% were reclassified as IC and 40% as JC-WM or other WM only. Overall, 50% (381/765) of CGM lesions seen on DIR were reclassified, and 26.5% (203/765) affected WM only. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with higher resolution PSIR, a significant proportion of lesions classified as involving CGM on DIR appear to either contain more white matter than expected or to not involve CGM at all.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3823986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38239862013-11-15 MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem? Sethi, Varun Muhlert, Nils Ron, Maria Golay, Xavier Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A. Miller, David H. Chard, Declan T. Yousry, Tarek A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Accurate identification and localization of cortical gray matter (CGM) lesions in MS is important when determining their clinical relevance. Double inversion recovery (DIR) scans have been widely used to detect MS CGM lesions. Phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) scans have a higher signal to noise, and can therefore be obtained at a higher resolution within clinically acceptable times. This enables detection of more CGM lesions depicting a clearer cortical and juxtacortical anatomy. In this study, we systematically investigated if the use of high resolution PSIR scans changes the classification of CGM lesions, when compared with standard resolution DIR scans. METHODS: 60 patients [30 RR(Relapsing remitting) and 15 each with PP(Primary progressive) and SP(Secondary progressive) MS] were scanned on a 3T Philips Achieva MRI scanner. Images acquired included DIR (1×1×3 mm resolution) and PSIR (0.5×0.5×2 mm). CGM lesions were detected and classified on DIR as intracortical (IC) or leucocortical (LC). We then examined these lesions on corresponding slices of the high resolution PSIR scans and categorized them as IC, LC, Juxtacortical white matter (JC-WM, abutting but not entering cortex) and other white matter (WM, not juxtacortical). Classifications using both scans were noted. RESULTS: 282 IC and 483 LC were identified on DIR. Of the IC lesions, 61% were confirmed as IC on PSIR, 35.5% were reclassified as LC and 3.5% as JC-WM or other WM only. Of the LC DIR lesions, 43.9% were confirmed at LC on PSIR, 16.1% were reclassified as IC and 40% as JC-WM or other WM only. Overall, 50% (381/765) of CGM lesions seen on DIR were reclassified, and 26.5% (203/765) affected WM only. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with higher resolution PSIR, a significant proportion of lesions classified as involving CGM on DIR appear to either contain more white matter than expected or to not involve CGM at all. Public Library of Science 2013-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3823986/ /pubmed/24244381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078879 Text en © 2013 Sethi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sethi, Varun
Muhlert, Nils
Ron, Maria
Golay, Xavier
Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia A.
Miller, David H.
Chard, Declan T.
Yousry, Tarek A.
MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem?
title MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem?
title_full MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem?
title_fullStr MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem?
title_full_unstemmed MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem?
title_short MS Cortical Lesions on DIR: Not Quite What They Seem?
title_sort ms cortical lesions on dir: not quite what they seem?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3823986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078879
work_keys_str_mv AT sethivarun mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem
AT muhlertnils mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem
AT ronmaria mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem
AT golayxavier mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem
AT wheelerkingshottclaudiaa mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem
AT millerdavidh mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem
AT charddeclant mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem
AT yousrytareka mscorticallesionsondirnotquitewhattheyseem