Cargando…

On conductance-based neural field models

This technical note introduces a conductance-based neural field model that combines biologically realistic synaptic dynamics—based on transmembrane currents—with neural field equations, describing the propagation of spikes over the cortical surface. This model allows for fairly realistic inter-and i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinotsis, Dimitris A., Leite, Marco, Friston, Karl J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00158
_version_ 1782290661233393664
author Pinotsis, Dimitris A.
Leite, Marco
Friston, Karl J.
author_facet Pinotsis, Dimitris A.
Leite, Marco
Friston, Karl J.
author_sort Pinotsis, Dimitris A.
collection PubMed
description This technical note introduces a conductance-based neural field model that combines biologically realistic synaptic dynamics—based on transmembrane currents—with neural field equations, describing the propagation of spikes over the cortical surface. This model allows for fairly realistic inter-and intra-laminar intrinsic connections that underlie spatiotemporal neuronal dynamics. We focus on the response functions of expected neuronal states (such as depolarization) that generate observed electrophysiological signals (like LFP recordings and EEG). These response functions characterize the model's transfer functions and implicit spectral responses to (uncorrelated) input. Our main finding is that both the evoked responses (impulse response functions) and induced responses (transfer functions) show qualitative differences depending upon whether one uses a neural mass or field model. Furthermore, there are differences between the equivalent convolution and conductance models. Overall, all models reproduce a characteristic increase in frequency, when inhibition was increased by increasing the rate constants of inhibitory populations. However, convolution and conductance-based models showed qualitatively different changes in power, with convolution models showing decreases with increasing inhibition, while conductance models show the opposite effect. These differences suggest that conductance based field models may be important in empirical studies of cortical gain control or pharmacological manipulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3824089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38240892013-11-22 On conductance-based neural field models Pinotsis, Dimitris A. Leite, Marco Friston, Karl J. Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience This technical note introduces a conductance-based neural field model that combines biologically realistic synaptic dynamics—based on transmembrane currents—with neural field equations, describing the propagation of spikes over the cortical surface. This model allows for fairly realistic inter-and intra-laminar intrinsic connections that underlie spatiotemporal neuronal dynamics. We focus on the response functions of expected neuronal states (such as depolarization) that generate observed electrophysiological signals (like LFP recordings and EEG). These response functions characterize the model's transfer functions and implicit spectral responses to (uncorrelated) input. Our main finding is that both the evoked responses (impulse response functions) and induced responses (transfer functions) show qualitative differences depending upon whether one uses a neural mass or field model. Furthermore, there are differences between the equivalent convolution and conductance models. Overall, all models reproduce a characteristic increase in frequency, when inhibition was increased by increasing the rate constants of inhibitory populations. However, convolution and conductance-based models showed qualitatively different changes in power, with convolution models showing decreases with increasing inhibition, while conductance models show the opposite effect. These differences suggest that conductance based field models may be important in empirical studies of cortical gain control or pharmacological manipulations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3824089/ /pubmed/24273508 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00158 Text en Copyright © 2013 Pinotsis, Leite and Friston. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Pinotsis, Dimitris A.
Leite, Marco
Friston, Karl J.
On conductance-based neural field models
title On conductance-based neural field models
title_full On conductance-based neural field models
title_fullStr On conductance-based neural field models
title_full_unstemmed On conductance-based neural field models
title_short On conductance-based neural field models
title_sort on conductance-based neural field models
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00158
work_keys_str_mv AT pinotsisdimitrisa onconductancebasedneuralfieldmodels
AT leitemarco onconductancebasedneuralfieldmodels
AT fristonkarlj onconductancebasedneuralfieldmodels