Cargando…
Nobody’s perfect: can irregularities in pit structure influence vulnerability to cavitation?
Recent studies have suggested that species-specific pit properties such as pit membrane thickness, pit membrane porosity, torus-to-aperture diameter ratio and pit chamber depth influence xylem vulnerability to cavitation. Despite the indisputable importance of using mean pit characteristics, conside...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00453 |
_version_ | 1782290665446572032 |
---|---|
author | Plavcová, Lenka Jansen, Steven Klepsch, Matthias Hacke, Uwe G. |
author_facet | Plavcová, Lenka Jansen, Steven Klepsch, Matthias Hacke, Uwe G. |
author_sort | Plavcová, Lenka |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent studies have suggested that species-specific pit properties such as pit membrane thickness, pit membrane porosity, torus-to-aperture diameter ratio and pit chamber depth influence xylem vulnerability to cavitation. Despite the indisputable importance of using mean pit characteristics, considerable variability in pit structure within a single species or even within a single pit field should be acknowledged. According to the rare pit hypothesis, a single pit that is more air-permeable than many neighboring pits is sufficient to allow air-seeding. Therefore, any irregularities or morphological abnormalities in pit structure allowing air-seeding should be associated with increased vulnerability to cavitation. Considering the currently proposed models of air-seeding, pit features such as rare, large pores in the pit membrane, torus extensions, and plasmodesmatal pores in a torus can represent potential glitches. These aberrations in pit structure could either result from inherent developmental flaws, or from damage caused to the pit membrane by chemical and physical agents. This suggests the existence of interesting feedbacks between abiotic and biotic stresses in xylem physiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3824106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38241062013-11-22 Nobody’s perfect: can irregularities in pit structure influence vulnerability to cavitation? Plavcová, Lenka Jansen, Steven Klepsch, Matthias Hacke, Uwe G. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Recent studies have suggested that species-specific pit properties such as pit membrane thickness, pit membrane porosity, torus-to-aperture diameter ratio and pit chamber depth influence xylem vulnerability to cavitation. Despite the indisputable importance of using mean pit characteristics, considerable variability in pit structure within a single species or even within a single pit field should be acknowledged. According to the rare pit hypothesis, a single pit that is more air-permeable than many neighboring pits is sufficient to allow air-seeding. Therefore, any irregularities or morphological abnormalities in pit structure allowing air-seeding should be associated with increased vulnerability to cavitation. Considering the currently proposed models of air-seeding, pit features such as rare, large pores in the pit membrane, torus extensions, and plasmodesmatal pores in a torus can represent potential glitches. These aberrations in pit structure could either result from inherent developmental flaws, or from damage caused to the pit membrane by chemical and physical agents. This suggests the existence of interesting feedbacks between abiotic and biotic stresses in xylem physiology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3824106/ /pubmed/24273549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00453 Text en Copyright © 2013 Plavcová, Jansen, Klepsch and Hacke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Plavcová, Lenka Jansen, Steven Klepsch, Matthias Hacke, Uwe G. Nobody’s perfect: can irregularities in pit structure influence vulnerability to cavitation? |
title | Nobody’s perfect: can irregularities in pit structure influence vulnerability to cavitation? |
title_full | Nobody’s perfect: can irregularities in pit structure influence vulnerability to cavitation? |
title_fullStr | Nobody’s perfect: can irregularities in pit structure influence vulnerability to cavitation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Nobody’s perfect: can irregularities in pit structure influence vulnerability to cavitation? |
title_short | Nobody’s perfect: can irregularities in pit structure influence vulnerability to cavitation? |
title_sort | nobody’s perfect: can irregularities in pit structure influence vulnerability to cavitation? |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plavcovalenka nobodysperfectcanirregularitiesinpitstructureinfluencevulnerabilitytocavitation AT jansensteven nobodysperfectcanirregularitiesinpitstructureinfluencevulnerabilitytocavitation AT klepschmatthias nobodysperfectcanirregularitiesinpitstructureinfluencevulnerabilitytocavitation AT hackeuweg nobodysperfectcanirregularitiesinpitstructureinfluencevulnerabilitytocavitation |