Cargando…

The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of transvaginal trocar-guided polypropylene mesh insertion with traditional colporrhaphy for treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial in which women with advanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delroy, Carlos A., de A. Castro, Rodrigo, Dias, Márcia M., Feldner, Paulo C., Bortolini, Maria Augusta T., Girão, Manoel J. B. C., Sartori, Marair G. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23632800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2092-0
_version_ 1782290677202157568
author Delroy, Carlos A.
de A. Castro, Rodrigo
Dias, Márcia M.
Feldner, Paulo C.
Bortolini, Maria Augusta T.
Girão, Manoel J. B. C.
Sartori, Marair G. F.
author_facet Delroy, Carlos A.
de A. Castro, Rodrigo
Dias, Márcia M.
Feldner, Paulo C.
Bortolini, Maria Augusta T.
Girão, Manoel J. B. C.
Sartori, Marair G. F.
author_sort Delroy, Carlos A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of transvaginal trocar-guided polypropylene mesh insertion with traditional colporrhaphy for treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial in which women with advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse, at least stage II with Ba ≥ +1 cm according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) classification, were randomly assigned to have either anterior colporrhaphy (n = 39) or repair using trocar-guided transvaginal mesh (n = 40). The primary outcome was objective cure rate of the anterior compartment (point Ba) assessed at the 12-month follow-up visit, with stages 0 and I defined as anatomical success. Secondary outcomes included quantification of other vaginal compartments (POP-Q points), comparison of quality of life by the prolapse quality of life (P-QOL) questionnaire, and complication rate between the groups after 1 year. Study power was fixed as 80 % with 5 % cutoff point (p < 0.05) for statistical significance. RESULTS: The groups were similar regarding demographic and clinical preoperative parameters. Anatomical success rates for colporrhaphy and repair with mesh placement groups were 56.4 vs 82.5 % (95 % confidence interval 0.068–0.54), respectively, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.018). Similar total complication rates were observed in both groups, with tape exposure observed in 5 % of the patients. There was a significant improvement in all P-QOL domains as a result of both procedures (p < 0.001), but they were not distinct between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Trocar-guided transvaginal synthetic mesh for advanced anterior POP repair is associated with a higher anatomical success rate for the anterior compartment compared with traditional colporrhaphy. Quality of life equally improved after both techniques. However, the trial failed to detect differences in P-QOL scores and complication rates between the groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3824218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38242182013-11-21 The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial Delroy, Carlos A. de A. Castro, Rodrigo Dias, Márcia M. Feldner, Paulo C. Bortolini, Maria Augusta T. Girão, Manoel J. B. C. Sartori, Marair G. F. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of transvaginal trocar-guided polypropylene mesh insertion with traditional colporrhaphy for treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial in which women with advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse, at least stage II with Ba ≥ +1 cm according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) classification, were randomly assigned to have either anterior colporrhaphy (n = 39) or repair using trocar-guided transvaginal mesh (n = 40). The primary outcome was objective cure rate of the anterior compartment (point Ba) assessed at the 12-month follow-up visit, with stages 0 and I defined as anatomical success. Secondary outcomes included quantification of other vaginal compartments (POP-Q points), comparison of quality of life by the prolapse quality of life (P-QOL) questionnaire, and complication rate between the groups after 1 year. Study power was fixed as 80 % with 5 % cutoff point (p < 0.05) for statistical significance. RESULTS: The groups were similar regarding demographic and clinical preoperative parameters. Anatomical success rates for colporrhaphy and repair with mesh placement groups were 56.4 vs 82.5 % (95 % confidence interval 0.068–0.54), respectively, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.018). Similar total complication rates were observed in both groups, with tape exposure observed in 5 % of the patients. There was a significant improvement in all P-QOL domains as a result of both procedures (p < 0.001), but they were not distinct between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Trocar-guided transvaginal synthetic mesh for advanced anterior POP repair is associated with a higher anatomical success rate for the anterior compartment compared with traditional colporrhaphy. Quality of life equally improved after both techniques. However, the trial failed to detect differences in P-QOL scores and complication rates between the groups. Springer London 2013-04-30 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3824218/ /pubmed/23632800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2092-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Delroy, Carlos A.
de A. Castro, Rodrigo
Dias, Márcia M.
Feldner, Paulo C.
Bortolini, Maria Augusta T.
Girão, Manoel J. B. C.
Sartori, Marair G. F.
The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial
title The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23632800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2092-0
work_keys_str_mv AT delroycarlosa theuseoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT deacastrorodrigo theuseoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT diasmarciam theuseoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT feldnerpauloc theuseoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bortolinimariaaugustat theuseoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT giraomanoeljbc theuseoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sartorimarairgf theuseoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT delroycarlosa useoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT deacastrorodrigo useoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT diasmarciam useoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT feldnerpauloc useoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bortolinimariaaugustat useoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT giraomanoeljbc useoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sartorimarairgf useoftransvaginalsyntheticmeshforanteriorvaginalwallprolapserepairarandomizedcontrolledtrial