Cargando…
Does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population?
In dependent-lineage harvester ant populations, two lineages interbreed but are genetically distinct. The offspring of a male and queen of the same lineage are female reproductives; the offspring of a male and queen of different lineages are workers. Geographic surveys have shown asymmetries in the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23715745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2690-z |
_version_ | 1782290719080185856 |
---|---|
author | Gordon, Deborah M. Pilko, Anna De Bortoli, Nicolas Ingram, Krista K. |
author_facet | Gordon, Deborah M. Pilko, Anna De Bortoli, Nicolas Ingram, Krista K. |
author_sort | Gordon, Deborah M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In dependent-lineage harvester ant populations, two lineages interbreed but are genetically distinct. The offspring of a male and queen of the same lineage are female reproductives; the offspring of a male and queen of different lineages are workers. Geographic surveys have shown asymmetries in the ratio of the two lineages in many harvester ant populations, which may be maintained by an ecological advantage to one of the lineages. Using census data from a long-term study of a dependent-lineage population of the red harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus, we identified the lineage of 130 colonies sampled in 1997–1999, ranging in age from 1 to 19 years when collected, and 268 colonies sampled in 2010, ranging in age from 1 to 28 years when collected. The ratio of lineages in the study population is similar across an 11-year interval, 0.59 J2 in 1999 and 0.66 J2 in 2010. The rare lineage, J1, had a slightly but significantly higher number of mates of the opposite lineage than the common lineage, J2, and, using data from previous work on reproductive output, higher male production. Mature colonies of the two lineages did not differ in nest mound size, foraging activity, or the propensity to relocate their nests. There were no strong differences in the relative recruitment or survivorship of the two lineages. Our results show no ecological advantage for either lineage, indicating that differences between the lineages in sex ratio allocation may be sufficient to maintain the current asymmetry of the lineage ratio in this population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00442-013-2690-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3824609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38246092013-11-21 Does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population? Gordon, Deborah M. Pilko, Anna De Bortoli, Nicolas Ingram, Krista K. Oecologia Population ecology - Original research In dependent-lineage harvester ant populations, two lineages interbreed but are genetically distinct. The offspring of a male and queen of the same lineage are female reproductives; the offspring of a male and queen of different lineages are workers. Geographic surveys have shown asymmetries in the ratio of the two lineages in many harvester ant populations, which may be maintained by an ecological advantage to one of the lineages. Using census data from a long-term study of a dependent-lineage population of the red harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus, we identified the lineage of 130 colonies sampled in 1997–1999, ranging in age from 1 to 19 years when collected, and 268 colonies sampled in 2010, ranging in age from 1 to 28 years when collected. The ratio of lineages in the study population is similar across an 11-year interval, 0.59 J2 in 1999 and 0.66 J2 in 2010. The rare lineage, J1, had a slightly but significantly higher number of mates of the opposite lineage than the common lineage, J2, and, using data from previous work on reproductive output, higher male production. Mature colonies of the two lineages did not differ in nest mound size, foraging activity, or the propensity to relocate their nests. There were no strong differences in the relative recruitment or survivorship of the two lineages. Our results show no ecological advantage for either lineage, indicating that differences between the lineages in sex ratio allocation may be sufficient to maintain the current asymmetry of the lineage ratio in this population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00442-013-2690-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-05-29 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3824609/ /pubmed/23715745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2690-z Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Population ecology - Original research Gordon, Deborah M. Pilko, Anna De Bortoli, Nicolas Ingram, Krista K. Does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population? |
title | Does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population? |
title_full | Does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population? |
title_fullStr | Does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population? |
title_short | Does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population? |
title_sort | does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population? |
topic | Population ecology - Original research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23715745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2690-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gordondeborahm doesanecologicaladvantageproducetheasymmetriclineageratioinaharvesterantpopulation AT pilkoanna doesanecologicaladvantageproducetheasymmetriclineageratioinaharvesterantpopulation AT debortolinicolas doesanecologicaladvantageproducetheasymmetriclineageratioinaharvesterantpopulation AT ingramkristak doesanecologicaladvantageproducetheasymmetriclineageratioinaharvesterantpopulation |