Cargando…

Impaired renal function is a major determinant of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: assessment by stress myocardial perfusion imaging

OBJECTIVE: Relationships between myocardial scintigraphic parameters and renal function have not been fully determined. We investigated correlations between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and left ventricular (LV) diastolic function using stress electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated myocardi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sato, Wakana, Kosaka, Toshimitsu, Koyama, Takashi, Ishida, Masaru, Iino, Kenji, Watanabe, Hiroyuki, Ito, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23712332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-013-0739-z
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Relationships between myocardial scintigraphic parameters and renal function have not been fully determined. We investigated correlations between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and left ventricular (LV) diastolic function using stress electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS: We enrolled 136 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who were assessed using technetium-99m stress ECG-gated myocardial SPECT. We evaluated SPECT images using 17-segment defect scores graded on a 5-point scale, summed stress score, summed rest score and summed difference score (SDS). The parameters for assessing LV diastolic function were peak filling rate (PFR), 1/3 mean filling rate and time to peak filling. The CAD was defined as SDS ≥2. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Patients were assigned to the following four groups (no CAD/no CKD: control group, n = 68; CAD/no CKD: CAD group, n = 24; no CAD/CKD: CKD group, n = 34; CAD/CKD: CAD + CKD group, n = 10). RESULTS: The PFR was significantly impaired after stress in the CKD and CAD + CKD groups compared with controls (p < 0.001 for both). Furthermore, PFR at rest positively correlated with eGFR (r = 0.29, p < 0.001) and inversely correlated with SDS (r = −0.18, p < 0.05). Multivariate stepwise regression analysis independently associated eGFR with PFR (β coefficient = 0.260, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that impaired renal function is a significant determinant of LV diastolic dysfunction in patients with suspected CAD.