Cargando…

Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy of the stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy(SVAB) using a decubitus table and to compare histologic underestimation rate between 11gauge(G)- and 8G-probes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pathologic results of SVAB using a decubitus table of 210(120 with 11G; 90 with 8G)-p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Kyoung Eun, Kim, Hak Hee, Shin, Hee Jung, Cha, Joo Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24255847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-551
_version_ 1782290734714454016
author Lee, Kyoung Eun
Kim, Hak Hee
Shin, Hee Jung
Cha, Joo Hee
author_facet Lee, Kyoung Eun
Kim, Hak Hee
Shin, Hee Jung
Cha, Joo Hee
author_sort Lee, Kyoung Eun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy of the stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy(SVAB) using a decubitus table and to compare histologic underestimation rate between 11gauge(G)- and 8G-probes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pathologic results of SVAB using a decubitus table of 210(120 with 11G; 90 with 8G)-procedures in 208-women(median age, 48.8 years; range, 27-73 years) were retrospectively reviewed. SVAB was performed for suspicious microcalcification without mass on MMG and US. Surgury was performed for the diagnosis of malignant or high-risk lesion (65(31.0%)). Patients with benign diagnosis (120(57.1%)) underwent MMG follow-up (mean, 340-days). Histologic underestimation was defined as the need to upgrade ADH to DCIS or IDC, and DCIS to IDC at surgery. We analyzed the difference of procedure time, core number and core weight between 11G- and 8G-groups. Statistical significance was determined with chi-square test and 95%-CI for histologic underestimation, and student T-test for comparing two-groups. RESULTS: Targeting was successful in all 210-biopsies on specimen radiographs. Mean core number, core weight and procedure time were 17.5 (17.5 ± 4.9), 1.57 g (1.57 ± 0.56), 34.5 min (34.5 ± 16.4) with 11G-probe, and 9.6 (9.6 ± 6.2), 1.83g (1.83 ± 0.93), 22.1 min (22.1 ± 12.5) with 8G-probe. Findings in 120 (57.1%) of the biopsies were benign, 36 (17.2%) were high-risk, and 54 (25.7%) were malignant. Two (6.25%) of 32 cases of ADH were upgraded to DCIS in 11G-group, and 2 (9.09%) of 22 in 8G-group. No case of DCIS was upgraded to IDC. There was no increase of complication in 8G-group than 11G-group. CONCLUSION: SVAB using a decubitus table is safe and effective method for the evaluation of suspicious microcalcification, and there was no significant difference between 11G- and 8G-probes. But, SVAB with 8G-probe is significantly more time efficient and effective procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3824706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38247062013-11-19 Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy Lee, Kyoung Eun Kim, Hak Hee Shin, Hee Jung Cha, Joo Hee Springerplus Research PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy of the stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy(SVAB) using a decubitus table and to compare histologic underestimation rate between 11gauge(G)- and 8G-probes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pathologic results of SVAB using a decubitus table of 210(120 with 11G; 90 with 8G)-procedures in 208-women(median age, 48.8 years; range, 27-73 years) were retrospectively reviewed. SVAB was performed for suspicious microcalcification without mass on MMG and US. Surgury was performed for the diagnosis of malignant or high-risk lesion (65(31.0%)). Patients with benign diagnosis (120(57.1%)) underwent MMG follow-up (mean, 340-days). Histologic underestimation was defined as the need to upgrade ADH to DCIS or IDC, and DCIS to IDC at surgery. We analyzed the difference of procedure time, core number and core weight between 11G- and 8G-groups. Statistical significance was determined with chi-square test and 95%-CI for histologic underestimation, and student T-test for comparing two-groups. RESULTS: Targeting was successful in all 210-biopsies on specimen radiographs. Mean core number, core weight and procedure time were 17.5 (17.5 ± 4.9), 1.57 g (1.57 ± 0.56), 34.5 min (34.5 ± 16.4) with 11G-probe, and 9.6 (9.6 ± 6.2), 1.83g (1.83 ± 0.93), 22.1 min (22.1 ± 12.5) with 8G-probe. Findings in 120 (57.1%) of the biopsies were benign, 36 (17.2%) were high-risk, and 54 (25.7%) were malignant. Two (6.25%) of 32 cases of ADH were upgraded to DCIS in 11G-group, and 2 (9.09%) of 22 in 8G-group. No case of DCIS was upgraded to IDC. There was no increase of complication in 8G-group than 11G-group. CONCLUSION: SVAB using a decubitus table is safe and effective method for the evaluation of suspicious microcalcification, and there was no significant difference between 11G- and 8G-probes. But, SVAB with 8G-probe is significantly more time efficient and effective procedure. Springer International Publishing 2013-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3824706/ /pubmed/24255847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-551 Text en © Lee et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Kyoung Eun
Kim, Hak Hee
Shin, Hee Jung
Cha, Joo Hee
Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
title Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
title_full Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
title_fullStr Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
title_short Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
title_sort stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24255847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-551
work_keys_str_mv AT leekyoungeun stereotacticbiopsyofthebreastusingadecubitustablecomparisonofhistologicunderestimationratesbetween11and8gaugevacuumassistedbreastbiopsy
AT kimhakhee stereotacticbiopsyofthebreastusingadecubitustablecomparisonofhistologicunderestimationratesbetween11and8gaugevacuumassistedbreastbiopsy
AT shinheejung stereotacticbiopsyofthebreastusingadecubitustablecomparisonofhistologicunderestimationratesbetween11and8gaugevacuumassistedbreastbiopsy
AT chajoohee stereotacticbiopsyofthebreastusingadecubitustablecomparisonofhistologicunderestimationratesbetween11and8gaugevacuumassistedbreastbiopsy