Cargando…
Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre
This study reports about teacher motivation and work engagement in a Dutch University Medical Centre (UMC). We examined factors affecting the motivation for teaching in a UMC, the engagement of UMC Utrecht teaching faculty in their work, and their engagement in teaching compared with engagement in p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0080-1 |
_version_ | 1782290740110426112 |
---|---|
author | van den Berg, B. A. M. Bakker, Arnold B. ten Cate, Th. J. |
author_facet | van den Berg, B. A. M. Bakker, Arnold B. ten Cate, Th. J. |
author_sort | van den Berg, B. A. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study reports about teacher motivation and work engagement in a Dutch University Medical Centre (UMC). We examined factors affecting the motivation for teaching in a UMC, the engagement of UMC Utrecht teaching faculty in their work, and their engagement in teaching compared with engagement in patient care and research. Based on a pilot study within various departments at the UMCU, a survey on teaching motivation and work engagement was developed and sent to over 600 UMCU teachers. About 50 % responded. Work engagement was measured by the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, included in this survey. From a list of 22 pre-defined items, 5 were marked as most motivating: teaching about my own speciality, noticeable appreciation for teaching by my direct superior, teaching small groups, feedback on my teaching performance, and freedom to determine what I teach. Feedback on my teaching performance showed the strongest predictive value for teaching engagement. Engagement scores were relatively favourable, but engagement with patient care was higher than with research and teaching. Task combinations appear to decrease teaching engagement. Our results match with self-determination theory and the job demands–resources model, and challenge the policy to combine teaching with research and patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3824746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38247462013-11-19 Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre van den Berg, B. A. M. Bakker, Arnold B. ten Cate, Th. J. Perspect Med Educ Original Article This study reports about teacher motivation and work engagement in a Dutch University Medical Centre (UMC). We examined factors affecting the motivation for teaching in a UMC, the engagement of UMC Utrecht teaching faculty in their work, and their engagement in teaching compared with engagement in patient care and research. Based on a pilot study within various departments at the UMCU, a survey on teaching motivation and work engagement was developed and sent to over 600 UMCU teachers. About 50 % responded. Work engagement was measured by the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, included in this survey. From a list of 22 pre-defined items, 5 were marked as most motivating: teaching about my own speciality, noticeable appreciation for teaching by my direct superior, teaching small groups, feedback on my teaching performance, and freedom to determine what I teach. Feedback on my teaching performance showed the strongest predictive value for teaching engagement. Engagement scores were relatively favourable, but engagement with patient care was higher than with research and teaching. Task combinations appear to decrease teaching engagement. Our results match with self-determination theory and the job demands–resources model, and challenge the policy to combine teaching with research and patient care. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2013-09-14 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3824746/ /pubmed/24037742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0080-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article van den Berg, B. A. M. Bakker, Arnold B. ten Cate, Th. J. Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre |
title | Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre |
title_full | Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre |
title_fullStr | Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre |
title_full_unstemmed | Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre |
title_short | Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre |
title_sort | key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0080-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbergbam keyfactorsinworkengagementandjobmotivationofteachingfacultyatauniversitymedicalcentre AT bakkerarnoldb keyfactorsinworkengagementandjobmotivationofteachingfacultyatauniversitymedicalcentre AT tencatethj keyfactorsinworkengagementandjobmotivationofteachingfacultyatauniversitymedicalcentre |