Cargando…

An analytical investigation of 24 oxygenated-PAHs (OPAHs) using liquid and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

We developed two independent approaches for separation and quantitation of 24 oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (OPAHs) using both liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization/mass spectrometry (LC-APCI/MS) and gas chromatography-electron impact/mass spectrometry (GC-EI/M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connell, Steven G., Haigh, Theodore, Wilson, Glenn, Anderson, Kim A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24005604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7319-x
_version_ 1782290749070508032
author O’Connell, Steven G.
Haigh, Theodore
Wilson, Glenn
Anderson, Kim A.
author_facet O’Connell, Steven G.
Haigh, Theodore
Wilson, Glenn
Anderson, Kim A.
author_sort O’Connell, Steven G.
collection PubMed
description We developed two independent approaches for separation and quantitation of 24 oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (OPAHs) using both liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization/mass spectrometry (LC-APCI/MS) and gas chromatography-electron impact/mass spectrometry (GC-EI/MS). Building on previous OPAH research, we examined laboratory stability of OPAHs, improved existing method parameters, and compared quantification strategies using standard addition and an internal standard on an environmental sample. Of 24 OPAHs targeted in this research, 19 compounds are shared between methods, with 3 uniquely quantitated by GC-EI/MS and 2 by LC-APCI/MS. Using calibration standards, all GC-EI/MS OPAHs were within 15 % of the true value and had less than 15 % relative standard deviations (RSDs) for interday variability. Similarly, all LC-APCI/MS OPAHs were within 20 % of the true value and had less than 15 % RSDs for interday variability. Instrument limits of detection ranged from 0.18 to 36 ng mL(−1) on the GC-EI/MS and 2.6 to 26 ng mL(−1) on the LC-APCI/MS. Four standard reference materials were analyzed with each method, and we report some compounds not previously published in these materials, such as perinaphthenone and xanthone. Finally, an environmental passive sampling extract from Portland Harbor Superfund, OR was analyzed by each method using both internal standard and standard addition to compensate for potential matrix effects. Internal standard quantitation resulted in increased precision with similar accuracy to standard addition for most OPAHs using 2-fluoro-fluorenone-(13)C as an internal standard. Overall, this work improves upon OPAH analytical methods and provides some considerations and strategies for OPAHs as focus continues to expand on this emerging chemical class. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-013-7319-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3824841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38248412013-11-21 An analytical investigation of 24 oxygenated-PAHs (OPAHs) using liquid and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry O’Connell, Steven G. Haigh, Theodore Wilson, Glenn Anderson, Kim A. Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper We developed two independent approaches for separation and quantitation of 24 oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (OPAHs) using both liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization/mass spectrometry (LC-APCI/MS) and gas chromatography-electron impact/mass spectrometry (GC-EI/MS). Building on previous OPAH research, we examined laboratory stability of OPAHs, improved existing method parameters, and compared quantification strategies using standard addition and an internal standard on an environmental sample. Of 24 OPAHs targeted in this research, 19 compounds are shared between methods, with 3 uniquely quantitated by GC-EI/MS and 2 by LC-APCI/MS. Using calibration standards, all GC-EI/MS OPAHs were within 15 % of the true value and had less than 15 % relative standard deviations (RSDs) for interday variability. Similarly, all LC-APCI/MS OPAHs were within 20 % of the true value and had less than 15 % RSDs for interday variability. Instrument limits of detection ranged from 0.18 to 36 ng mL(−1) on the GC-EI/MS and 2.6 to 26 ng mL(−1) on the LC-APCI/MS. Four standard reference materials were analyzed with each method, and we report some compounds not previously published in these materials, such as perinaphthenone and xanthone. Finally, an environmental passive sampling extract from Portland Harbor Superfund, OR was analyzed by each method using both internal standard and standard addition to compensate for potential matrix effects. Internal standard quantitation resulted in increased precision with similar accuracy to standard addition for most OPAHs using 2-fluoro-fluorenone-(13)C as an internal standard. Overall, this work improves upon OPAH analytical methods and provides some considerations and strategies for OPAHs as focus continues to expand on this emerging chemical class. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-013-7319-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-09-05 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3824841/ /pubmed/24005604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7319-x Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
O’Connell, Steven G.
Haigh, Theodore
Wilson, Glenn
Anderson, Kim A.
An analytical investigation of 24 oxygenated-PAHs (OPAHs) using liquid and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
title An analytical investigation of 24 oxygenated-PAHs (OPAHs) using liquid and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
title_full An analytical investigation of 24 oxygenated-PAHs (OPAHs) using liquid and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
title_fullStr An analytical investigation of 24 oxygenated-PAHs (OPAHs) using liquid and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed An analytical investigation of 24 oxygenated-PAHs (OPAHs) using liquid and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
title_short An analytical investigation of 24 oxygenated-PAHs (OPAHs) using liquid and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
title_sort analytical investigation of 24 oxygenated-pahs (opahs) using liquid and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24005604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7319-x
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnellsteveng ananalyticalinvestigationof24oxygenatedpahsopahsusingliquidandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT haightheodore ananalyticalinvestigationof24oxygenatedpahsopahsusingliquidandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT wilsonglenn ananalyticalinvestigationof24oxygenatedpahsopahsusingliquidandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT andersonkima ananalyticalinvestigationof24oxygenatedpahsopahsusingliquidandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT oconnellsteveng analyticalinvestigationof24oxygenatedpahsopahsusingliquidandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT haightheodore analyticalinvestigationof24oxygenatedpahsopahsusingliquidandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT wilsonglenn analyticalinvestigationof24oxygenatedpahsopahsusingliquidandgaschromatographymassspectrometry
AT andersonkima analyticalinvestigationof24oxygenatedpahsopahsusingliquidandgaschromatographymassspectrometry