Cargando…
Quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks
Subjective assessment of results after laser treatment for birthmarks does not provide a validated method for clinicians. Previous reports concerning objective evaluation using L*a*b color coordinates were only partially successful due to difficulties in standardizing and comparing colors from pre-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23388877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1272-y |
_version_ | 1782290749745790976 |
---|---|
author | Szychta, Pawel Al-Nakib, Khalil Anderson, Will Stewart, Ken Quaba, Awf |
author_facet | Szychta, Pawel Al-Nakib, Khalil Anderson, Will Stewart, Ken Quaba, Awf |
author_sort | Szychta, Pawel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Subjective assessment of results after laser treatment for birthmarks does not provide a validated method for clinicians. Previous reports concerning objective evaluation using L*a*b color coordinates were only partially successful due to difficulties in standardizing and comparing colors from pre- and posttreatment photographs. The study aimed to present a reliable and clinically applicable method of aesthetic result assessment after laser treatment for birthmarks. All 48 patients, included in the study, were treated for birthmarks on the face or neck using laser. Each pre- and posttreatment photograph was subjected to triple objective comparative assessment of color fading with use of a computer program, as well as to subjective evaluation by three core physicians and three laypeople. Objective analysis was based on an innovative method using combined L*a*b and hue saturation value color coordinates. Accuracy was higher between objective assessment with the computer program and subjective evaluation by core physicians than by laypeople. Repeatability of results was higher with the use of the computer program than among core physicians or among laypeople. In conclusion, our method may be considered for objective assessment of the results after laser treatment of vascular and pigmented birthmarks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3824844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38248442013-11-21 Quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks Szychta, Pawel Al-Nakib, Khalil Anderson, Will Stewart, Ken Quaba, Awf Lasers Med Sci Original Article Subjective assessment of results after laser treatment for birthmarks does not provide a validated method for clinicians. Previous reports concerning objective evaluation using L*a*b color coordinates were only partially successful due to difficulties in standardizing and comparing colors from pre- and posttreatment photographs. The study aimed to present a reliable and clinically applicable method of aesthetic result assessment after laser treatment for birthmarks. All 48 patients, included in the study, were treated for birthmarks on the face or neck using laser. Each pre- and posttreatment photograph was subjected to triple objective comparative assessment of color fading with use of a computer program, as well as to subjective evaluation by three core physicians and three laypeople. Objective analysis was based on an innovative method using combined L*a*b and hue saturation value color coordinates. Accuracy was higher between objective assessment with the computer program and subjective evaluation by core physicians than by laypeople. Repeatability of results was higher with the use of the computer program than among core physicians or among laypeople. In conclusion, our method may be considered for objective assessment of the results after laser treatment of vascular and pigmented birthmarks. Springer London 2013-02-07 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3824844/ /pubmed/23388877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1272-y Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Szychta, Pawel Al-Nakib, Khalil Anderson, Will Stewart, Ken Quaba, Awf Quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks |
title | Quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks |
title_full | Quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks |
title_fullStr | Quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks |
title_short | Quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks |
title_sort | quantitative method for evaluation of aesthetic results after laser treatment for birthmarks |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3824844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23388877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1272-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szychtapawel quantitativemethodforevaluationofaestheticresultsafterlasertreatmentforbirthmarks AT alnakibkhalil quantitativemethodforevaluationofaestheticresultsafterlasertreatmentforbirthmarks AT andersonwill quantitativemethodforevaluationofaestheticresultsafterlasertreatmentforbirthmarks AT stewartken quantitativemethodforevaluationofaestheticresultsafterlasertreatmentforbirthmarks AT quabaawf quantitativemethodforevaluationofaestheticresultsafterlasertreatmentforbirthmarks |