Cargando…

LiquiBand® Surgical S topical adhesive versus sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds. A randomized controlled trial

Cyanoacrylate adhesives offer the surgeon and patient an alternative to subcuticular suturing. LiquiBand® Surgical S (LBSS) is a new formulation with a blend of monomeric n-butyl and 2-octyl cyanoacrylates. In this study, the effectiveness, safety, and clinical utility of LBSS was compared to Vicryl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jan, Haider, Waters, Natasha, Haines, Pat, Kent, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0805-5
_version_ 1782290807559028736
author Jan, Haider
Waters, Natasha
Haines, Pat
Kent, Andrew
author_facet Jan, Haider
Waters, Natasha
Haines, Pat
Kent, Andrew
author_sort Jan, Haider
collection PubMed
description Cyanoacrylate adhesives offer the surgeon and patient an alternative to subcuticular suturing. LiquiBand® Surgical S (LBSS) is a new formulation with a blend of monomeric n-butyl and 2-octyl cyanoacrylates. In this study, the effectiveness, safety, and clinical utility of LBSS was compared to Vicryl(™) sutures for the closure of laparoscopic incisions. This was a prospective randomized study of LBSS skin adhesive versus Vicryl(™) sutures for the topical closure of laparoscopic surgical incisions. Subjects were asked to return at 2 weeks postsurgery to report complications and adverse events. Wounds were evaluated for apposition and cosmesis using a modified Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES). The Shapiro–Wilk test of normality was done. Independent-samples T test, Mann Whitney U test, and chi-square test were used to compare variables between the two wound closure methods. A total of 114 subjects participated in this trial completing all aspects of the study. Fifty-five subjects received sutures for topical wound closure, with 59 subjects receiving LBSS. Surgeons were found to be satisfied with 100 % of all applications using the LBSS device. One hundred percent of wounds closed with sutures and 98.9 % wounds closed with LBSS achieving an optimal HWES of 0. There was no statistical difference in cosmesis or complications for either method. Closure with LBSS was significantly faster by a mean of 2 min. LiquiBand® Surgical S is as good as sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds in terms of cosmesis and complications with the added benefit of being significantly faster.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3825541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38255412013-11-21 LiquiBand® Surgical S topical adhesive versus sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds. A randomized controlled trial Jan, Haider Waters, Natasha Haines, Pat Kent, Andrew Gynecol Surg Original Article Cyanoacrylate adhesives offer the surgeon and patient an alternative to subcuticular suturing. LiquiBand® Surgical S (LBSS) is a new formulation with a blend of monomeric n-butyl and 2-octyl cyanoacrylates. In this study, the effectiveness, safety, and clinical utility of LBSS was compared to Vicryl(™) sutures for the closure of laparoscopic incisions. This was a prospective randomized study of LBSS skin adhesive versus Vicryl(™) sutures for the topical closure of laparoscopic surgical incisions. Subjects were asked to return at 2 weeks postsurgery to report complications and adverse events. Wounds were evaluated for apposition and cosmesis using a modified Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES). The Shapiro–Wilk test of normality was done. Independent-samples T test, Mann Whitney U test, and chi-square test were used to compare variables between the two wound closure methods. A total of 114 subjects participated in this trial completing all aspects of the study. Fifty-five subjects received sutures for topical wound closure, with 59 subjects receiving LBSS. Surgeons were found to be satisfied with 100 % of all applications using the LBSS device. One hundred percent of wounds closed with sutures and 98.9 % wounds closed with LBSS achieving an optimal HWES of 0. There was no statistical difference in cosmesis or complications for either method. Closure with LBSS was significantly faster by a mean of 2 min. LiquiBand® Surgical S is as good as sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds in terms of cosmesis and complications with the added benefit of being significantly faster. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-07-10 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3825541/ /pubmed/24273476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0805-5 Text en © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
spellingShingle Original Article
Jan, Haider
Waters, Natasha
Haines, Pat
Kent, Andrew
LiquiBand® Surgical S topical adhesive versus sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds. A randomized controlled trial
title LiquiBand® Surgical S topical adhesive versus sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds. A randomized controlled trial
title_full LiquiBand® Surgical S topical adhesive versus sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds. A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr LiquiBand® Surgical S topical adhesive versus sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds. A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed LiquiBand® Surgical S topical adhesive versus sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds. A randomized controlled trial
title_short LiquiBand® Surgical S topical adhesive versus sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds. A randomized controlled trial
title_sort liquiband® surgical s topical adhesive versus sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds. a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0805-5
work_keys_str_mv AT janhaider liquibandsurgicalstopicaladhesiveversussuturesfortheclosureoflaparoscopicwoundsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT watersnatasha liquibandsurgicalstopicaladhesiveversussuturesfortheclosureoflaparoscopicwoundsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hainespat liquibandsurgicalstopicaladhesiveversussuturesfortheclosureoflaparoscopicwoundsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kentandrew liquibandsurgicalstopicaladhesiveversussuturesfortheclosureoflaparoscopicwoundsarandomizedcontrolledtrial