Cargando…

The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing

Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4(th) International BCI conference, which took pla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nijboer, Femke, Clausen, Jens, Allison, Brendan Z., Haselager, Pim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6
_version_ 1782290818769354752
author Nijboer, Femke
Clausen, Jens
Allison, Brendan Z.
Haselager, Pim
author_facet Nijboer, Femke
Clausen, Jens
Allison, Brendan Z.
Haselager, Pim
author_sort Nijboer, Femke
collection PubMed
description Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4(th) International BCI conference, which took place in May–June 2010 in Asilomar, California. We assessed respondents’ opinions about a number of topics. First, we investigated preferences for terminology and definitions relating to BCIs. Second, we assessed respondents’ expectations on the marketability of different BCI applications (BCIs for healthy people, BCIs for assistive technology, BCIs-controlled neuroprostheses and BCIs as therapy tools). Third, we investigated opinions about ethical issues related to BCI research for the development of assistive technology: informed consent process with locked-in patients, risk-benefit analyses, team responsibility, consequences of BCI on patients’ and families’ lives, liability and personal identity and interaction with the media. Finally, we asked respondents which issues are urgent in BCI research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3825606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38256062013-11-21 The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing Nijboer, Femke Clausen, Jens Allison, Brendan Z. Haselager, Pim Neuroethics Original Paper Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4(th) International BCI conference, which took place in May–June 2010 in Asilomar, California. We assessed respondents’ opinions about a number of topics. First, we investigated preferences for terminology and definitions relating to BCIs. Second, we assessed respondents’ expectations on the marketability of different BCI applications (BCIs for healthy people, BCIs for assistive technology, BCIs-controlled neuroprostheses and BCIs as therapy tools). Third, we investigated opinions about ethical issues related to BCI research for the development of assistive technology: informed consent process with locked-in patients, risk-benefit analyses, team responsibility, consequences of BCI on patients’ and families’ lives, liability and personal identity and interaction with the media. Finally, we asked respondents which issues are urgent in BCI research. Springer Netherlands 2011-08-17 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3825606/ /pubmed/24273623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Nijboer, Femke
Clausen, Jens
Allison, Brendan Z.
Haselager, Pim
The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing
title The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing
title_full The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing
title_fullStr The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing
title_full_unstemmed The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing
title_short The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing
title_sort asilomar survey: stakeholders’ opinions on ethical issues related to brain-computer interfacing
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6
work_keys_str_mv AT nijboerfemke theasilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing
AT clausenjens theasilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing
AT allisonbrendanz theasilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing
AT haselagerpim theasilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing
AT nijboerfemke asilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing
AT clausenjens asilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing
AT allisonbrendanz asilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing
AT haselagerpim asilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing