Cargando…
The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing
Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4(th) International BCI conference, which took pla...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6 |
_version_ | 1782290818769354752 |
---|---|
author | Nijboer, Femke Clausen, Jens Allison, Brendan Z. Haselager, Pim |
author_facet | Nijboer, Femke Clausen, Jens Allison, Brendan Z. Haselager, Pim |
author_sort | Nijboer, Femke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4(th) International BCI conference, which took place in May–June 2010 in Asilomar, California. We assessed respondents’ opinions about a number of topics. First, we investigated preferences for terminology and definitions relating to BCIs. Second, we assessed respondents’ expectations on the marketability of different BCI applications (BCIs for healthy people, BCIs for assistive technology, BCIs-controlled neuroprostheses and BCIs as therapy tools). Third, we investigated opinions about ethical issues related to BCI research for the development of assistive technology: informed consent process with locked-in patients, risk-benefit analyses, team responsibility, consequences of BCI on patients’ and families’ lives, liability and personal identity and interaction with the media. Finally, we asked respondents which issues are urgent in BCI research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3825606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38256062013-11-21 The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing Nijboer, Femke Clausen, Jens Allison, Brendan Z. Haselager, Pim Neuroethics Original Paper Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4(th) International BCI conference, which took place in May–June 2010 in Asilomar, California. We assessed respondents’ opinions about a number of topics. First, we investigated preferences for terminology and definitions relating to BCIs. Second, we assessed respondents’ expectations on the marketability of different BCI applications (BCIs for healthy people, BCIs for assistive technology, BCIs-controlled neuroprostheses and BCIs as therapy tools). Third, we investigated opinions about ethical issues related to BCI research for the development of assistive technology: informed consent process with locked-in patients, risk-benefit analyses, team responsibility, consequences of BCI on patients’ and families’ lives, liability and personal identity and interaction with the media. Finally, we asked respondents which issues are urgent in BCI research. Springer Netherlands 2011-08-17 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3825606/ /pubmed/24273623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Nijboer, Femke Clausen, Jens Allison, Brendan Z. Haselager, Pim The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing |
title | The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing |
title_full | The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing |
title_fullStr | The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing |
title_full_unstemmed | The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing |
title_short | The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing |
title_sort | asilomar survey: stakeholders’ opinions on ethical issues related to brain-computer interfacing |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nijboerfemke theasilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing AT clausenjens theasilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing AT allisonbrendanz theasilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing AT haselagerpim theasilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing AT nijboerfemke asilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing AT clausenjens asilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing AT allisonbrendanz asilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing AT haselagerpim asilomarsurveystakeholdersopinionsonethicalissuesrelatedtobraincomputerinterfacing |