Cargando…

Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running

This study investigated differences in average [Formula: see text] of maximal effort interval running to maximal effort constant rate running at lactate threshold matched for time. The average [Formula: see text] and distance covered of 10 recreational male runners ([Formula: see text]: 4158 ± 390 m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pratt, Daniel, O'Brien, Brendan J., Clark, Bradley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/680326
_version_ 1782290898100420608
author Pratt, Daniel
O'Brien, Brendan J.
Clark, Bradley
author_facet Pratt, Daniel
O'Brien, Brendan J.
Clark, Bradley
author_sort Pratt, Daniel
collection PubMed
description This study investigated differences in average [Formula: see text] of maximal effort interval running to maximal effort constant rate running at lactate threshold matched for time. The average [Formula: see text] and distance covered of 10 recreational male runners ([Formula: see text]: 4158 ± 390 mL·min(−1)) were compared between a maximal effort constant-rate run at lactate threshold (CRLT), a maximal effort interval run (INT) consisting of 2 min at [Formula: see text] speed with 2 minutes at 50% of [Formula: see text] repeated 5 times, and a run at the average speed sustained during the interval run (CR submax). Data are presented as mean and 95% confidence intervals. The average [Formula: see text] for INT, 3451 (3269–3633) mL·min(−1), 83% [Formula: see text] , was not significantly different to CRLT, 3464 (3285–3643) mL·min(−1), 84% [Formula: see text] , but both were significantly higher than CR sub-max, 3464 (3285–3643) mL·min(−1), 76% [Formula: see text]. The distance covered was significantly greater in CLRT, 4431 (4202–3731) metres, compared to INT and CR sub-max, 4070 (3831–4309) metres. The novel finding was that a 20-minute maximal effort constant rate run uses similar amounts of oxygen as a 20-minute maximal effort interval run despite the greater distance covered in the maximal effort constant-rate run.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3826314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38263142013-11-28 Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running Pratt, Daniel O'Brien, Brendan J. Clark, Bradley ScientificWorldJournal Clinical Study This study investigated differences in average [Formula: see text] of maximal effort interval running to maximal effort constant rate running at lactate threshold matched for time. The average [Formula: see text] and distance covered of 10 recreational male runners ([Formula: see text]: 4158 ± 390 mL·min(−1)) were compared between a maximal effort constant-rate run at lactate threshold (CRLT), a maximal effort interval run (INT) consisting of 2 min at [Formula: see text] speed with 2 minutes at 50% of [Formula: see text] repeated 5 times, and a run at the average speed sustained during the interval run (CR submax). Data are presented as mean and 95% confidence intervals. The average [Formula: see text] for INT, 3451 (3269–3633) mL·min(−1), 83% [Formula: see text] , was not significantly different to CRLT, 3464 (3285–3643) mL·min(−1), 84% [Formula: see text] , but both were significantly higher than CR sub-max, 3464 (3285–3643) mL·min(−1), 76% [Formula: see text]. The distance covered was significantly greater in CLRT, 4431 (4202–3731) metres, compared to INT and CR sub-max, 4070 (3831–4309) metres. The novel finding was that a 20-minute maximal effort constant rate run uses similar amounts of oxygen as a 20-minute maximal effort interval run despite the greater distance covered in the maximal effort constant-rate run. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3826314/ /pubmed/24288501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/680326 Text en Copyright © 2013 Daniel Pratt et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Pratt, Daniel
O'Brien, Brendan J.
Clark, Bradley
Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title_full Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title_fullStr Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title_full_unstemmed Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title_short Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title_sort oxygen uptake in maximal effort constant rate and interval running
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/680326
work_keys_str_mv AT prattdaniel oxygenuptakeinmaximaleffortconstantrateandintervalrunning
AT obrienbrendanj oxygenuptakeinmaximaleffortconstantrateandintervalrunning
AT clarkbradley oxygenuptakeinmaximaleffortconstantrateandintervalrunning