Cargando…

Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans

Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (A. ferrooxidans) was applied in coal biodesulfurization and coal's pyrite bioleaching. The result showed that A. ferrooxidans had significantly promoted the biodesulfurization of coal and bioleaching of coal's pyrite. After 16 days of processing, the total s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Fen-Fen, He, Huan, Liu, Jin-Yan, Tao, Xiu-Xiang, Zheng, Lei, Zhao, Yi-Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/184964
_version_ 1782290926033436672
author Hong, Fen-Fen
He, Huan
Liu, Jin-Yan
Tao, Xiu-Xiang
Zheng, Lei
Zhao, Yi-Dong
author_facet Hong, Fen-Fen
He, Huan
Liu, Jin-Yan
Tao, Xiu-Xiang
Zheng, Lei
Zhao, Yi-Dong
author_sort Hong, Fen-Fen
collection PubMed
description Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (A. ferrooxidans) was applied in coal biodesulfurization and coal's pyrite bioleaching. The result showed that A. ferrooxidans had significantly promoted the biodesulfurization of coal and bioleaching of coal's pyrite. After 16 days of processing, the total sulfur removal rate of coal was 50.6%, and among them the removal of pyritic sulfur was up to 69.9%. On the contrary, after 12 days of processing, the coal's pyrite bioleaching rate was 72.0%. SEM micrographs showed that the major pyrite forms in coal were massive and veinlets. It seems that the bacteria took priority to remove the massive pyrite. The sulfur relative contents analysis from XANES showed that the elemental sulfur (28.32%) and jarosite (18.99%) were accumulated in the biotreated residual coal. However, XRD and XANES spectra of residual pyrite indicated that the sulfur components were mainly composed of pyrite (49.34%) and elemental sulfur (50.72%) but no other sulfur contents were detected. Based on the present results, we speculated that the pyrite forms in coal might affect sulfur biooxidation process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3826568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38265682013-11-28 Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Hong, Fen-Fen He, Huan Liu, Jin-Yan Tao, Xiu-Xiang Zheng, Lei Zhao, Yi-Dong ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (A. ferrooxidans) was applied in coal biodesulfurization and coal's pyrite bioleaching. The result showed that A. ferrooxidans had significantly promoted the biodesulfurization of coal and bioleaching of coal's pyrite. After 16 days of processing, the total sulfur removal rate of coal was 50.6%, and among them the removal of pyritic sulfur was up to 69.9%. On the contrary, after 12 days of processing, the coal's pyrite bioleaching rate was 72.0%. SEM micrographs showed that the major pyrite forms in coal were massive and veinlets. It seems that the bacteria took priority to remove the massive pyrite. The sulfur relative contents analysis from XANES showed that the elemental sulfur (28.32%) and jarosite (18.99%) were accumulated in the biotreated residual coal. However, XRD and XANES spectra of residual pyrite indicated that the sulfur components were mainly composed of pyrite (49.34%) and elemental sulfur (50.72%) but no other sulfur contents were detected. Based on the present results, we speculated that the pyrite forms in coal might affect sulfur biooxidation process. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3826568/ /pubmed/24288464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/184964 Text en Copyright © 2013 Fen-Fen Hong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hong, Fen-Fen
He, Huan
Liu, Jin-Yan
Tao, Xiu-Xiang
Zheng, Lei
Zhao, Yi-Dong
Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
title Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
title_full Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
title_fullStr Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
title_short Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
title_sort comparison analysis of coal biodesulfurization and coal's pyrite bioleaching with acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/184964
work_keys_str_mv AT hongfenfen comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans
AT hehuan comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans
AT liujinyan comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans
AT taoxiuxiang comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans
AT zhenglei comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans
AT zhaoyidong comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans