Cargando…
Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (A. ferrooxidans) was applied in coal biodesulfurization and coal's pyrite bioleaching. The result showed that A. ferrooxidans had significantly promoted the biodesulfurization of coal and bioleaching of coal's pyrite. After 16 days of processing, the total s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/184964 |
_version_ | 1782290926033436672 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Fen-Fen He, Huan Liu, Jin-Yan Tao, Xiu-Xiang Zheng, Lei Zhao, Yi-Dong |
author_facet | Hong, Fen-Fen He, Huan Liu, Jin-Yan Tao, Xiu-Xiang Zheng, Lei Zhao, Yi-Dong |
author_sort | Hong, Fen-Fen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (A. ferrooxidans) was applied in coal biodesulfurization and coal's pyrite bioleaching. The result showed that A. ferrooxidans had significantly promoted the biodesulfurization of coal and bioleaching of coal's pyrite. After 16 days of processing, the total sulfur removal rate of coal was 50.6%, and among them the removal of pyritic sulfur was up to 69.9%. On the contrary, after 12 days of processing, the coal's pyrite bioleaching rate was 72.0%. SEM micrographs showed that the major pyrite forms in coal were massive and veinlets. It seems that the bacteria took priority to remove the massive pyrite. The sulfur relative contents analysis from XANES showed that the elemental sulfur (28.32%) and jarosite (18.99%) were accumulated in the biotreated residual coal. However, XRD and XANES spectra of residual pyrite indicated that the sulfur components were mainly composed of pyrite (49.34%) and elemental sulfur (50.72%) but no other sulfur contents were detected. Based on the present results, we speculated that the pyrite forms in coal might affect sulfur biooxidation process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3826568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38265682013-11-28 Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Hong, Fen-Fen He, Huan Liu, Jin-Yan Tao, Xiu-Xiang Zheng, Lei Zhao, Yi-Dong ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (A. ferrooxidans) was applied in coal biodesulfurization and coal's pyrite bioleaching. The result showed that A. ferrooxidans had significantly promoted the biodesulfurization of coal and bioleaching of coal's pyrite. After 16 days of processing, the total sulfur removal rate of coal was 50.6%, and among them the removal of pyritic sulfur was up to 69.9%. On the contrary, after 12 days of processing, the coal's pyrite bioleaching rate was 72.0%. SEM micrographs showed that the major pyrite forms in coal were massive and veinlets. It seems that the bacteria took priority to remove the massive pyrite. The sulfur relative contents analysis from XANES showed that the elemental sulfur (28.32%) and jarosite (18.99%) were accumulated in the biotreated residual coal. However, XRD and XANES spectra of residual pyrite indicated that the sulfur components were mainly composed of pyrite (49.34%) and elemental sulfur (50.72%) but no other sulfur contents were detected. Based on the present results, we speculated that the pyrite forms in coal might affect sulfur biooxidation process. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3826568/ /pubmed/24288464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/184964 Text en Copyright © 2013 Fen-Fen Hong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hong, Fen-Fen He, Huan Liu, Jin-Yan Tao, Xiu-Xiang Zheng, Lei Zhao, Yi-Dong Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans |
title | Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
|
title_full | Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
|
title_fullStr | Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
|
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
|
title_short | Comparison Analysis of Coal Biodesulfurization and Coal's Pyrite Bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans
|
title_sort | comparison analysis of coal biodesulfurization and coal's pyrite bioleaching with acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/184964 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongfenfen comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans AT hehuan comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans AT liujinyan comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans AT taoxiuxiang comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans AT zhenglei comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans AT zhaoyidong comparisonanalysisofcoalbiodesulfurizationandcoalspyritebioleachingwithacidithiobacillusferrooxidans |