Cargando…

Procalcitonin as an indicator of urosepsis

BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin has been advocated as a marker of bacterial infection, so this study was carried out to determine the usefulness of serum procalcitonin in the early diagnosis of urosepsis. METHODS: The subjects were 37 febrile patients with urinary tract infection in whom we examined the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugimoto, Koichi, Adomi, Shogo, Koike, Hiroyuki, Esa, Atsunobu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24400237
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S42711
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin has been advocated as a marker of bacterial infection, so this study was carried out to determine the usefulness of serum procalcitonin in the early diagnosis of urosepsis. METHODS: The subjects were 37 febrile patients with urinary tract infection in whom we examined the serum procalcitonin concentration at the start of treatment. RESULTS: Thirty patients had acute pyelonephritis (16 simple, 14 complex), one had emphysematous pyelonephritis, five had acute prostatitis, and one had acute epididymitis. The procalcitonin level was <0.5 ng/mL in 18 patients, ≥0.5 ng/mL in one patient, ≥2 ng/mL in seven patients, and ≥10 ng/mL in 11 patients. Five of the 11 patients with procalcitonin levels ≥ 10 ng/mL had disseminated intravascular coagulation. All patients with urinary tract obstruction and disseminated intravascular coagulation had procalcitonin levels ≥ 10 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Although this retrospective study comprised a small number of patients, we found that procalcitonin was a useful marker for urinary tract infection.