Cargando…

Short-term outcomes of the surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistulas: does technique matter?

BACKGROUND: Acquired rectourethral fistulas are uncommon and challenging to repair. Most arise as a complication of prostate cancer treatment. Several procedures have been described to repair rectourethral fistulas with varying outcomes. We review the etiology, management, and outcomes of patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nfonsam, Valentine N, Mateka, James JL, Prather, Andrew D, Marcet, Jorge E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24400234
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S28002
_version_ 1782290971254325248
author Nfonsam, Valentine N
Mateka, James JL
Prather, Andrew D
Marcet, Jorge E
author_facet Nfonsam, Valentine N
Mateka, James JL
Prather, Andrew D
Marcet, Jorge E
author_sort Nfonsam, Valentine N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acquired rectourethral fistulas are uncommon and challenging to repair. Most arise as a complication of prostate cancer treatment. Several procedures have been described to repair rectourethral fistulas with varying outcomes. We review the etiology, management, and outcomes of patients with rectourethral fistulas at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing repair of rectourethral fistulas was undertaken. Data were collected on patient demographics, fistula etiology, operative procedure, fecal and urinary diversion, and clinical outcome. Patients with urinary and/or fecal diversion underwent radiographic evaluation to confirm closure of the fistula prior to reversal of the diversion. RESULTS: Fistula repair was performed on 22 patients from 1999 to 2009. All the patients were male of an average age of 69 years (range: 39–82 years). All patients, except one, had prostate cancer. Fistula formation was associated with radiotherapy in 54.4% of patients, brachytherapy in 36.4% of patients, and with external beam radiation therapy in 18.2% of patients. Other causes included prostatectomy (seven patients, 31.8%), cryotherapy (two patients, 9.1%), and perianal abscess (one patient, 4.5%). Procedures performed for fistula repair included transanal repair (eleven patients, 50%), transperineal repair (five patients, 22.7%), transabdominal repair (three patients, 13.6%), and York–Mason repair (three patients, 13.6%). Fourteen patients (63.6%) had urinary diversion. Fecal diversion was performed in 16 (72.7%) patients. Five (22.7%) patients had had previous attempts at fistula repair. Of the 22 patients treated, repair was successful in 20 patients (91%). The average follow-up time was 6 months (range: 3–13 months). CONCLUSION: The success rate of treatment of rectourethral fistulas is high, regardless of the procedure type. Patients with previous repair attempts tend to have less favorable outcomes. With high success rates, less invasive procedures should be attempted first.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3826856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38268562014-01-07 Short-term outcomes of the surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistulas: does technique matter? Nfonsam, Valentine N Mateka, James JL Prather, Andrew D Marcet, Jorge E Res Rep Urol Original Research BACKGROUND: Acquired rectourethral fistulas are uncommon and challenging to repair. Most arise as a complication of prostate cancer treatment. Several procedures have been described to repair rectourethral fistulas with varying outcomes. We review the etiology, management, and outcomes of patients with rectourethral fistulas at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing repair of rectourethral fistulas was undertaken. Data were collected on patient demographics, fistula etiology, operative procedure, fecal and urinary diversion, and clinical outcome. Patients with urinary and/or fecal diversion underwent radiographic evaluation to confirm closure of the fistula prior to reversal of the diversion. RESULTS: Fistula repair was performed on 22 patients from 1999 to 2009. All the patients were male of an average age of 69 years (range: 39–82 years). All patients, except one, had prostate cancer. Fistula formation was associated with radiotherapy in 54.4% of patients, brachytherapy in 36.4% of patients, and with external beam radiation therapy in 18.2% of patients. Other causes included prostatectomy (seven patients, 31.8%), cryotherapy (two patients, 9.1%), and perianal abscess (one patient, 4.5%). Procedures performed for fistula repair included transanal repair (eleven patients, 50%), transperineal repair (five patients, 22.7%), transabdominal repair (three patients, 13.6%), and York–Mason repair (three patients, 13.6%). Fourteen patients (63.6%) had urinary diversion. Fecal diversion was performed in 16 (72.7%) patients. Five (22.7%) patients had had previous attempts at fistula repair. Of the 22 patients treated, repair was successful in 20 patients (91%). The average follow-up time was 6 months (range: 3–13 months). CONCLUSION: The success rate of treatment of rectourethral fistulas is high, regardless of the procedure type. Patients with previous repair attempts tend to have less favorable outcomes. With high success rates, less invasive procedures should be attempted first. Dove Medical Press 2013-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3826856/ /pubmed/24400234 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S28002 Text en © 2013 Nfonsam et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nfonsam, Valentine N
Mateka, James JL
Prather, Andrew D
Marcet, Jorge E
Short-term outcomes of the surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistulas: does technique matter?
title Short-term outcomes of the surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistulas: does technique matter?
title_full Short-term outcomes of the surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistulas: does technique matter?
title_fullStr Short-term outcomes of the surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistulas: does technique matter?
title_full_unstemmed Short-term outcomes of the surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistulas: does technique matter?
title_short Short-term outcomes of the surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistulas: does technique matter?
title_sort short-term outcomes of the surgical management of acquired rectourethral fistulas: does technique matter?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24400234
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S28002
work_keys_str_mv AT nfonsamvalentinen shorttermoutcomesofthesurgicalmanagementofacquiredrectourethralfistulasdoestechniquematter
AT matekajamesjl shorttermoutcomesofthesurgicalmanagementofacquiredrectourethralfistulasdoestechniquematter
AT pratherandrewd shorttermoutcomesofthesurgicalmanagementofacquiredrectourethralfistulasdoestechniquematter
AT marcetjorgee shorttermoutcomesofthesurgicalmanagementofacquiredrectourethralfistulasdoestechniquematter