Cargando…

Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE: It remains controversial whether mini-incision (MI) benefits patients in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of MI on surgical and functional outcomes in THA patients. METHODS: A systematic electronic litera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Chang-Peng, Li, Xue, Song, Jin-Qi, Cui, Zhuang, Yu, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24265792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080021
_version_ 1782291018420322304
author Xu, Chang-Peng
Li, Xue
Song, Jin-Qi
Cui, Zhuang
Yu, Bin
author_facet Xu, Chang-Peng
Li, Xue
Song, Jin-Qi
Cui, Zhuang
Yu, Bin
author_sort Xu, Chang-Peng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: It remains controversial whether mini-incision (MI) benefits patients in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of MI on surgical and functional outcomes in THA patients. METHODS: A systematic electronic literature search (up to May 2013) was conducted to identify RCTs comparing MI with standard incision (SI) THA. The primary outcome measures were surgical and functional outcomes. According to the surgical approach taken, MI THA patients were divided into four subgroups for sub-group meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk differences (RDs) with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using a fixed-effect or random-effect model according to the heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 14 RCTs involving THA 1,174 patients met the inclusion criteria. The trials were medium risk of bias. The overall meta-analysis showed MI THA reduced total blood loss (95% CI, -201.83 to -21.18; p=.02) and length of hospital stay ( 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.08; p=.01) with significant heterogeneity. However, subgroup meta-analysis revealed posterior MI THA had perioperative advantages of reduced surgical duration ( 95% CI, -8.45 to -2.67; P<.001), less blood loss ( 95% CI, -107.20 to -1.73; P=.04) and shorter hospital stay ( 95% CI, -0.74 to -0.06; p=.002) with low heterogeneity. There were no significant differences between MI and SI THA groups in term of pain medication dose, functional outcome (HHS), radiological outcome or complications (P>.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although no definite overall conclusion can be arrived at on whether MI THA is superior to SI THA, posterior MI THA clearly result in a significant decrease in surgical duration, blood loss and hospital stay. It seems to be a safe minimally invasive surgical procedure without increasing the risk of component malposition or complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3827164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38271642013-11-21 Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Xu, Chang-Peng Li, Xue Song, Jin-Qi Cui, Zhuang Yu, Bin PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: It remains controversial whether mini-incision (MI) benefits patients in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of MI on surgical and functional outcomes in THA patients. METHODS: A systematic electronic literature search (up to May 2013) was conducted to identify RCTs comparing MI with standard incision (SI) THA. The primary outcome measures were surgical and functional outcomes. According to the surgical approach taken, MI THA patients were divided into four subgroups for sub-group meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk differences (RDs) with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using a fixed-effect or random-effect model according to the heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 14 RCTs involving THA 1,174 patients met the inclusion criteria. The trials were medium risk of bias. The overall meta-analysis showed MI THA reduced total blood loss (95% CI, -201.83 to -21.18; p=.02) and length of hospital stay ( 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.08; p=.01) with significant heterogeneity. However, subgroup meta-analysis revealed posterior MI THA had perioperative advantages of reduced surgical duration ( 95% CI, -8.45 to -2.67; P<.001), less blood loss ( 95% CI, -107.20 to -1.73; P=.04) and shorter hospital stay ( 95% CI, -0.74 to -0.06; p=.002) with low heterogeneity. There were no significant differences between MI and SI THA groups in term of pain medication dose, functional outcome (HHS), radiological outcome or complications (P>.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although no definite overall conclusion can be arrived at on whether MI THA is superior to SI THA, posterior MI THA clearly result in a significant decrease in surgical duration, blood loss and hospital stay. It seems to be a safe minimally invasive surgical procedure without increasing the risk of component malposition or complications. Public Library of Science 2013-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3827164/ /pubmed/24265792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080021 Text en © 2013 Xu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Chang-Peng
Li, Xue
Song, Jin-Qi
Cui, Zhuang
Yu, Bin
Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort mini-incision versus standard incision total hip arthroplasty regarding surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24265792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080021
work_keys_str_mv AT xuchangpeng miniincisionversusstandardincisiontotalhiparthroplastyregardingsurgicaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lixue miniincisionversusstandardincisiontotalhiparthroplastyregardingsurgicaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT songjinqi miniincisionversusstandardincisiontotalhiparthroplastyregardingsurgicaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT cuizhuang miniincisionversusstandardincisiontotalhiparthroplastyregardingsurgicaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yubin miniincisionversusstandardincisiontotalhiparthroplastyregardingsurgicaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials