Cargando…

Associations between Physical and Cognitive Doping – A Cross-Sectional Study in 2.997 Triathletes

PURPOSE: This study assessed, for the first time, prevalence estimates for physical and cognitive doping within a single collective of athletes using the randomized response technique (RRT). Furthermore, associations between the use of legal and freely available substances to improve physical and co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dietz, Pavel, Ulrich, Rolf, Dalaker, Robert, Striegel, Heiko, Franke, Andreas G., Lieb, Klaus, Simon, Perikles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24236038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078702
_version_ 1782291034009501696
author Dietz, Pavel
Ulrich, Rolf
Dalaker, Robert
Striegel, Heiko
Franke, Andreas G.
Lieb, Klaus
Simon, Perikles
author_facet Dietz, Pavel
Ulrich, Rolf
Dalaker, Robert
Striegel, Heiko
Franke, Andreas G.
Lieb, Klaus
Simon, Perikles
author_sort Dietz, Pavel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study assessed, for the first time, prevalence estimates for physical and cognitive doping within a single collective of athletes using the randomized response technique (RRT). Furthermore, associations between the use of legal and freely available substances to improve physical and cognitive performance (enhancement) and illicit or banned substances to improve physical and cognitive performance (doping) were examined. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire using the unrelated question RRT was used to survey 2,997 recreational triathletes in three sports events (Frankfurt, Regensburg, and Wiesbaden) in Germany. Prior to the survey, statistical power analyses were performed to determine sample size. Logistic regression was used to predict physical and cognitive enhancement and the bootstrap method was used to evaluate differences between the estimated prevalences of physical and cognitive doping. RESULTS: 2,987 questionnaires were returned (99.7%). 12-month prevalences for physical and cognitive doping were 13.0% and 15.1%, respectively. The prevalence estimate for physical doping was significantly higher in athletes who also used physical enhancers, as well as in athletes who took part in the European Championship in Frankfurt compared to those who did not. The prevalence estimate for cognitive doping was significantly higher in athletes who also used physical and cognitive enhancers. Moreover, the use of physical and cognitive enhancers were significantly associated and also the use of physical and cognitive doping. DISCUSSION: The use of substances to improve physical and cognitive performance was associated on both levels of legality (enhancement vs. doping) suggesting that athletes do not use substances for a specific goal but may have a general propensity to enhance. This finding is important for understanding why people use such substances. Consequently, more effective prevention programs against substance abuse and doping could be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3827233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38272332013-11-14 Associations between Physical and Cognitive Doping – A Cross-Sectional Study in 2.997 Triathletes Dietz, Pavel Ulrich, Rolf Dalaker, Robert Striegel, Heiko Franke, Andreas G. Lieb, Klaus Simon, Perikles PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: This study assessed, for the first time, prevalence estimates for physical and cognitive doping within a single collective of athletes using the randomized response technique (RRT). Furthermore, associations between the use of legal and freely available substances to improve physical and cognitive performance (enhancement) and illicit or banned substances to improve physical and cognitive performance (doping) were examined. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire using the unrelated question RRT was used to survey 2,997 recreational triathletes in three sports events (Frankfurt, Regensburg, and Wiesbaden) in Germany. Prior to the survey, statistical power analyses were performed to determine sample size. Logistic regression was used to predict physical and cognitive enhancement and the bootstrap method was used to evaluate differences between the estimated prevalences of physical and cognitive doping. RESULTS: 2,987 questionnaires were returned (99.7%). 12-month prevalences for physical and cognitive doping were 13.0% and 15.1%, respectively. The prevalence estimate for physical doping was significantly higher in athletes who also used physical enhancers, as well as in athletes who took part in the European Championship in Frankfurt compared to those who did not. The prevalence estimate for cognitive doping was significantly higher in athletes who also used physical and cognitive enhancers. Moreover, the use of physical and cognitive enhancers were significantly associated and also the use of physical and cognitive doping. DISCUSSION: The use of substances to improve physical and cognitive performance was associated on both levels of legality (enhancement vs. doping) suggesting that athletes do not use substances for a specific goal but may have a general propensity to enhance. This finding is important for understanding why people use such substances. Consequently, more effective prevention programs against substance abuse and doping could be developed. Public Library of Science 2013-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3827233/ /pubmed/24236038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078702 Text en © 2013 Dietz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dietz, Pavel
Ulrich, Rolf
Dalaker, Robert
Striegel, Heiko
Franke, Andreas G.
Lieb, Klaus
Simon, Perikles
Associations between Physical and Cognitive Doping – A Cross-Sectional Study in 2.997 Triathletes
title Associations between Physical and Cognitive Doping – A Cross-Sectional Study in 2.997 Triathletes
title_full Associations between Physical and Cognitive Doping – A Cross-Sectional Study in 2.997 Triathletes
title_fullStr Associations between Physical and Cognitive Doping – A Cross-Sectional Study in 2.997 Triathletes
title_full_unstemmed Associations between Physical and Cognitive Doping – A Cross-Sectional Study in 2.997 Triathletes
title_short Associations between Physical and Cognitive Doping – A Cross-Sectional Study in 2.997 Triathletes
title_sort associations between physical and cognitive doping – a cross-sectional study in 2.997 triathletes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24236038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078702
work_keys_str_mv AT dietzpavel associationsbetweenphysicalandcognitivedopingacrosssectionalstudyin2997triathletes
AT ulrichrolf associationsbetweenphysicalandcognitivedopingacrosssectionalstudyin2997triathletes
AT dalakerrobert associationsbetweenphysicalandcognitivedopingacrosssectionalstudyin2997triathletes
AT striegelheiko associationsbetweenphysicalandcognitivedopingacrosssectionalstudyin2997triathletes
AT frankeandreasg associationsbetweenphysicalandcognitivedopingacrosssectionalstudyin2997triathletes
AT liebklaus associationsbetweenphysicalandcognitivedopingacrosssectionalstudyin2997triathletes
AT simonperikles associationsbetweenphysicalandcognitivedopingacrosssectionalstudyin2997triathletes