Cargando…

Appropriate Loads for Peak-Power During Resisted Sprinting on a Non-Motorized Treadmill

The purpose of this study was to determine the load which allows the highest peak power for resisted sprinting on a non-motorized treadmill and to determine if other variables are related to individual differences. Thirty college students were tested for vertical jump, vertical jump peak and mean po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andre, Matthew J., Fry, Andrew C., Lane, Michael T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24233103
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0056
_version_ 1782478283653251072
author Andre, Matthew J.
Fry, Andrew C.
Lane, Michael T.
author_facet Andre, Matthew J.
Fry, Andrew C.
Lane, Michael T.
author_sort Andre, Matthew J.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to determine the load which allows the highest peak power for resisted sprinting on a non-motorized treadmill and to determine if other variables are related to individual differences. Thirty college students were tested for vertical jump, vertical jump peak and mean power, 10 m sprint, 20 m sprint, leg press 1 RM, leg press 1 RM relative to body weight, leg press 1 RM relative to lean body mass, leg press 1 RM power, and leg press power at 80% of 1 RM. Participants performed eight resisted sprints on a non-motorized treadmill, with increasing relative loads expressed as percent of body weight. Sprint peak power was measured for each load. Pearson correlations were used to determine if relationships between the sprint peak power load and the other variables were significant. The sprint peak power load had a mode of 35% with 73% of all participants having a relative sprint peak power load between 25–35%. Significant correlations occurred between sprint peak power load and body weight, lean body mass, vertical jump peak and mean power, leg press 1 RM, leg press 1 RM relative to lean body mass, leg press 1 RM power, and leg press power at 80% of 1 RM (r = 0.44, 0.43, 0.39, 0.37, 0.47, 0.39, 0.46, and 0.47, respectively). Larger, stronger, more powerful athletes produced peak power at a higher relative load during resisted sprinting on a non-motorized treadmill.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3827764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38277642013-11-14 Appropriate Loads for Peak-Power During Resisted Sprinting on a Non-Motorized Treadmill Andre, Matthew J. Fry, Andrew C. Lane, Michael T. J Hum Kinet Research Article The purpose of this study was to determine the load which allows the highest peak power for resisted sprinting on a non-motorized treadmill and to determine if other variables are related to individual differences. Thirty college students were tested for vertical jump, vertical jump peak and mean power, 10 m sprint, 20 m sprint, leg press 1 RM, leg press 1 RM relative to body weight, leg press 1 RM relative to lean body mass, leg press 1 RM power, and leg press power at 80% of 1 RM. Participants performed eight resisted sprints on a non-motorized treadmill, with increasing relative loads expressed as percent of body weight. Sprint peak power was measured for each load. Pearson correlations were used to determine if relationships between the sprint peak power load and the other variables were significant. The sprint peak power load had a mode of 35% with 73% of all participants having a relative sprint peak power load between 25–35%. Significant correlations occurred between sprint peak power load and body weight, lean body mass, vertical jump peak and mean power, leg press 1 RM, leg press 1 RM relative to lean body mass, leg press 1 RM power, and leg press power at 80% of 1 RM (r = 0.44, 0.43, 0.39, 0.37, 0.47, 0.39, 0.46, and 0.47, respectively). Larger, stronger, more powerful athletes produced peak power at a higher relative load during resisted sprinting on a non-motorized treadmill. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3827764/ /pubmed/24233103 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0056 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Andre, Matthew J.
Fry, Andrew C.
Lane, Michael T.
Appropriate Loads for Peak-Power During Resisted Sprinting on a Non-Motorized Treadmill
title Appropriate Loads for Peak-Power During Resisted Sprinting on a Non-Motorized Treadmill
title_full Appropriate Loads for Peak-Power During Resisted Sprinting on a Non-Motorized Treadmill
title_fullStr Appropriate Loads for Peak-Power During Resisted Sprinting on a Non-Motorized Treadmill
title_full_unstemmed Appropriate Loads for Peak-Power During Resisted Sprinting on a Non-Motorized Treadmill
title_short Appropriate Loads for Peak-Power During Resisted Sprinting on a Non-Motorized Treadmill
title_sort appropriate loads for peak-power during resisted sprinting on a non-motorized treadmill
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24233103
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0056
work_keys_str_mv AT andrematthewj appropriateloadsforpeakpowerduringresistedsprintingonanonmotorizedtreadmill
AT fryandrewc appropriateloadsforpeakpowerduringresistedsprintingonanonmotorizedtreadmill
AT lanemichaelt appropriateloadsforpeakpowerduringresistedsprintingonanonmotorizedtreadmill