Cargando…
Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan
BACKGROUND: To compare the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 231 patients scheduled for preoperative CRT using two chemotherapeutic protocols from April 2003–A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24188746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-258 |
_version_ | 1782478299530788864 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sung Uk Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Sun Young Baek, Ji Yeon Chang, Hee Jin Kim, Min Ju Kim, Tae Hyun Park, Ji Won Oh, Jae Hwan |
author_facet | Lee, Sung Uk Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Sun Young Baek, Ji Yeon Chang, Hee Jin Kim, Min Ju Kim, Tae Hyun Park, Ji Won Oh, Jae Hwan |
author_sort | Lee, Sung Uk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 231 patients scheduled for preoperative CRT using two chemotherapeutic protocols from April 2003–August 2006. Pelvic radiotherapy (50.4 Gy) was delivered concurrently with capecitabine (n = 148) or capecitabine/irinotecan (n = 83). Surgery was performed 4–8 weeks after CRT completion. Tumor responses to CRT were assessed using both radiologic and pathologic measurements. Radiologic responses were evaluated by magnetic resonance volumetry, which was performed at the initial work-up and after completion of preoperative CRT just before surgery. Pathologic responses were assessed with downstaging (ypStage 0-1) and grading tumor regression. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in terms of local control, relapse-free survival, and overall survival rates. RESULTS: Radiologic examination demonstrated that tumor volume decreased by 65.6% in the capecitabine group and 66.8% capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.731). Postoperative pathologic stage determination showed that tumor downstaging occurred in 44.1% of the capecitabine group and 48.6% of the capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.538). The sum of tumor regression grade 3 (near complete response) and 4 (complete response) after CRT were 28.6% in the capecitabine group and 37.5% in the capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.247). There were no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year local control (91.7% vs. 92.5%; p = 0.875), relapse-free survival (80.8% vs. 77.2%; p = 0.685), and overall survival (88.4% vs. 90.4%; p = 0.723). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed no differences in the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome between preoperative capecitabine and capecitabine/irinotecan CRT regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3827873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38278732013-11-15 Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan Lee, Sung Uk Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Sun Young Baek, Ji Yeon Chang, Hee Jin Kim, Min Ju Kim, Tae Hyun Park, Ji Won Oh, Jae Hwan Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 231 patients scheduled for preoperative CRT using two chemotherapeutic protocols from April 2003–August 2006. Pelvic radiotherapy (50.4 Gy) was delivered concurrently with capecitabine (n = 148) or capecitabine/irinotecan (n = 83). Surgery was performed 4–8 weeks after CRT completion. Tumor responses to CRT were assessed using both radiologic and pathologic measurements. Radiologic responses were evaluated by magnetic resonance volumetry, which was performed at the initial work-up and after completion of preoperative CRT just before surgery. Pathologic responses were assessed with downstaging (ypStage 0-1) and grading tumor regression. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in terms of local control, relapse-free survival, and overall survival rates. RESULTS: Radiologic examination demonstrated that tumor volume decreased by 65.6% in the capecitabine group and 66.8% capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.731). Postoperative pathologic stage determination showed that tumor downstaging occurred in 44.1% of the capecitabine group and 48.6% of the capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.538). The sum of tumor regression grade 3 (near complete response) and 4 (complete response) after CRT were 28.6% in the capecitabine group and 37.5% in the capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.247). There were no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year local control (91.7% vs. 92.5%; p = 0.875), relapse-free survival (80.8% vs. 77.2%; p = 0.685), and overall survival (88.4% vs. 90.4%; p = 0.723). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed no differences in the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome between preoperative capecitabine and capecitabine/irinotecan CRT regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. BioMed Central 2013-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3827873/ /pubmed/24188746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-258 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Lee, Sung Uk Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Sun Young Baek, Ji Yeon Chang, Hee Jin Kim, Min Ju Kim, Tae Hyun Park, Ji Won Oh, Jae Hwan Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan |
title | Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan |
title_full | Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan |
title_short | Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan |
title_sort | comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24188746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesunguk comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan AT kimdaeyong comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan AT kimsunyoung comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan AT baekjiyeon comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan AT changheejin comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan AT kimminju comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan AT kimtaehyun comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan AT parkjiwon comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan AT ohjaehwan comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan |