Cargando…

Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan

BACKGROUND: To compare the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 231 patients scheduled for preoperative CRT using two chemotherapeutic protocols from April 2003–A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sung Uk, Kim, Dae Yong, Kim, Sun Young, Baek, Ji Yeon, Chang, Hee Jin, Kim, Min Ju, Kim, Tae Hyun, Park, Ji Won, Oh, Jae Hwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24188746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-258
_version_ 1782478299530788864
author Lee, Sung Uk
Kim, Dae Yong
Kim, Sun Young
Baek, Ji Yeon
Chang, Hee Jin
Kim, Min Ju
Kim, Tae Hyun
Park, Ji Won
Oh, Jae Hwan
author_facet Lee, Sung Uk
Kim, Dae Yong
Kim, Sun Young
Baek, Ji Yeon
Chang, Hee Jin
Kim, Min Ju
Kim, Tae Hyun
Park, Ji Won
Oh, Jae Hwan
author_sort Lee, Sung Uk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 231 patients scheduled for preoperative CRT using two chemotherapeutic protocols from April 2003–August 2006. Pelvic radiotherapy (50.4 Gy) was delivered concurrently with capecitabine (n = 148) or capecitabine/irinotecan (n = 83). Surgery was performed 4–8 weeks after CRT completion. Tumor responses to CRT were assessed using both radiologic and pathologic measurements. Radiologic responses were evaluated by magnetic resonance volumetry, which was performed at the initial work-up and after completion of preoperative CRT just before surgery. Pathologic responses were assessed with downstaging (ypStage 0-1) and grading tumor regression. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in terms of local control, relapse-free survival, and overall survival rates. RESULTS: Radiologic examination demonstrated that tumor volume decreased by 65.6% in the capecitabine group and 66.8% capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.731). Postoperative pathologic stage determination showed that tumor downstaging occurred in 44.1% of the capecitabine group and 48.6% of the capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.538). The sum of tumor regression grade 3 (near complete response) and 4 (complete response) after CRT were 28.6% in the capecitabine group and 37.5% in the capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.247). There were no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year local control (91.7% vs. 92.5%; p = 0.875), relapse-free survival (80.8% vs. 77.2%; p = 0.685), and overall survival (88.4% vs. 90.4%; p = 0.723). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed no differences in the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome between preoperative capecitabine and capecitabine/irinotecan CRT regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3827873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38278732013-11-15 Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan Lee, Sung Uk Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Sun Young Baek, Ji Yeon Chang, Hee Jin Kim, Min Ju Kim, Tae Hyun Park, Ji Won Oh, Jae Hwan Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 231 patients scheduled for preoperative CRT using two chemotherapeutic protocols from April 2003–August 2006. Pelvic radiotherapy (50.4 Gy) was delivered concurrently with capecitabine (n = 148) or capecitabine/irinotecan (n = 83). Surgery was performed 4–8 weeks after CRT completion. Tumor responses to CRT were assessed using both radiologic and pathologic measurements. Radiologic responses were evaluated by magnetic resonance volumetry, which was performed at the initial work-up and after completion of preoperative CRT just before surgery. Pathologic responses were assessed with downstaging (ypStage 0-1) and grading tumor regression. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in terms of local control, relapse-free survival, and overall survival rates. RESULTS: Radiologic examination demonstrated that tumor volume decreased by 65.6% in the capecitabine group and 66.8% capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.731). Postoperative pathologic stage determination showed that tumor downstaging occurred in 44.1% of the capecitabine group and 48.6% of the capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.538). The sum of tumor regression grade 3 (near complete response) and 4 (complete response) after CRT were 28.6% in the capecitabine group and 37.5% in the capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.247). There were no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year local control (91.7% vs. 92.5%; p = 0.875), relapse-free survival (80.8% vs. 77.2%; p = 0.685), and overall survival (88.4% vs. 90.4%; p = 0.723). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed no differences in the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome between preoperative capecitabine and capecitabine/irinotecan CRT regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. BioMed Central 2013-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3827873/ /pubmed/24188746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-258 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Sung Uk
Kim, Dae Yong
Kim, Sun Young
Baek, Ji Yeon
Chang, Hee Jin
Kim, Min Ju
Kim, Tae Hyun
Park, Ji Won
Oh, Jae Hwan
Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan
title Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan
title_full Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan
title_fullStr Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan
title_short Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan
title_sort comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24188746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-258
work_keys_str_mv AT leesunguk comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan
AT kimdaeyong comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan
AT kimsunyoung comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan
AT baekjiyeon comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan
AT changheejin comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan
AT kimminju comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan
AT kimtaehyun comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan
AT parkjiwon comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan
AT ohjaehwan comparisonoftwopreoperativechemoradiotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedrectalcancercapecitabinealoneversuscapecitabineplusirinotecan