Cargando…

Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE)

BACKGROUND: The extent to which a genomic test will be used in practice is affected by factors such as ability of the test to correctly predict response to treatment (i.e. sensitivity and specificity of the test), invasiveness of the testing procedure, test cost, and the probability and severity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Najafzadeh, Mehdi, Johnston, Karissa M, Peacock, Stuart J, Connors, Joseph M, Marra, Marco A, Lynd, Larry D, Marra, Carlo A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24176050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-454
_version_ 1782291164627468288
author Najafzadeh, Mehdi
Johnston, Karissa M
Peacock, Stuart J
Connors, Joseph M
Marra, Marco A
Lynd, Larry D
Marra, Carlo A
author_facet Najafzadeh, Mehdi
Johnston, Karissa M
Peacock, Stuart J
Connors, Joseph M
Marra, Marco A
Lynd, Larry D
Marra, Carlo A
author_sort Najafzadeh, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The extent to which a genomic test will be used in practice is affected by factors such as ability of the test to correctly predict response to treatment (i.e. sensitivity and specificity of the test), invasiveness of the testing procedure, test cost, and the probability and severity of side effects associated with treatment. METHODS: Using discrete choice experimentation (DCE), we elicited preferences of the public (Sample 1, N = 533 and Sample 2, N = 525) and cancer patients (Sample 3, N = 38) for different attributes of a hypothetical genomic test for guiding cancer treatment. Samples 1 and 3 considered the test/treatment in the context of an aggressive curable cancer (scenario A) while the scenario for sample 2 was based on a non-aggressive incurable cancer (scenario B). RESULTS: In aggressive curable cancer (scenario A), everything else being equal, the odds ratio (OR) of choosing a test with 95% sensitivity was 1.41 (versus a test with 50% sensitivity) and willingness to pay (WTP) was $1331, on average, for this amount of improvement in test sensitivity. In this scenario, the OR of choosing a test with 95% specificity was 1.24 times that of a test with 50% specificity (WTP = $827). In non-aggressive incurable cancer (scenario B), the OR of choosing a test with 95% sensitivity was 1.65 (WTP = $1344), and the OR of choosing a test with 95% specificity was 1.50 (WTP = $1080). Reducing severity of treatment side effects from severe to mild was associated with large ORs in both scenarios (OR = 2.10 and 2.24 in scenario A and B, respectively). In contrast, patients had a very large preference for 95% sensitivity of the test (OR = 5.23). CONCLUSION: The type and prognosis of cancer affected preferences for genomically-guided treatment. In aggressive curable cancer, individuals emphasized more on the sensitivity rather than the specificity of the test. In contrast, for a non-aggressive incurable cancer, individuals put similar emphasis on sensitivity and specificity of the test. While the public expressed strong preference toward lowering severity of side effects, improving sensitivity of the test had by far the largest influence on patients’ decision to use genomic testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3827922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38279222013-11-15 Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Najafzadeh, Mehdi Johnston, Karissa M Peacock, Stuart J Connors, Joseph M Marra, Marco A Lynd, Larry D Marra, Carlo A BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The extent to which a genomic test will be used in practice is affected by factors such as ability of the test to correctly predict response to treatment (i.e. sensitivity and specificity of the test), invasiveness of the testing procedure, test cost, and the probability and severity of side effects associated with treatment. METHODS: Using discrete choice experimentation (DCE), we elicited preferences of the public (Sample 1, N = 533 and Sample 2, N = 525) and cancer patients (Sample 3, N = 38) for different attributes of a hypothetical genomic test for guiding cancer treatment. Samples 1 and 3 considered the test/treatment in the context of an aggressive curable cancer (scenario A) while the scenario for sample 2 was based on a non-aggressive incurable cancer (scenario B). RESULTS: In aggressive curable cancer (scenario A), everything else being equal, the odds ratio (OR) of choosing a test with 95% sensitivity was 1.41 (versus a test with 50% sensitivity) and willingness to pay (WTP) was $1331, on average, for this amount of improvement in test sensitivity. In this scenario, the OR of choosing a test with 95% specificity was 1.24 times that of a test with 50% specificity (WTP = $827). In non-aggressive incurable cancer (scenario B), the OR of choosing a test with 95% sensitivity was 1.65 (WTP = $1344), and the OR of choosing a test with 95% specificity was 1.50 (WTP = $1080). Reducing severity of treatment side effects from severe to mild was associated with large ORs in both scenarios (OR = 2.10 and 2.24 in scenario A and B, respectively). In contrast, patients had a very large preference for 95% sensitivity of the test (OR = 5.23). CONCLUSION: The type and prognosis of cancer affected preferences for genomically-guided treatment. In aggressive curable cancer, individuals emphasized more on the sensitivity rather than the specificity of the test. In contrast, for a non-aggressive incurable cancer, individuals put similar emphasis on sensitivity and specificity of the test. While the public expressed strong preference toward lowering severity of side effects, improving sensitivity of the test had by far the largest influence on patients’ decision to use genomic testing. BioMed Central 2013-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3827922/ /pubmed/24176050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-454 Text en Copyright © 2013 Najafzadeh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Najafzadeh, Mehdi
Johnston, Karissa M
Peacock, Stuart J
Connors, Joseph M
Marra, Marco A
Lynd, Larry D
Marra, Carlo A
Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE)
title Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE)
title_full Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE)
title_fullStr Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE)
title_full_unstemmed Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE)
title_short Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE)
title_sort genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using discrete choice experiment (dce)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3827922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24176050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-454
work_keys_str_mv AT najafzadehmehdi genomictestingtodeterminedrugresponsemeasuringpreferencesofthepublicandpatientsusingdiscretechoiceexperimentdce
AT johnstonkarissam genomictestingtodeterminedrugresponsemeasuringpreferencesofthepublicandpatientsusingdiscretechoiceexperimentdce
AT peacockstuartj genomictestingtodeterminedrugresponsemeasuringpreferencesofthepublicandpatientsusingdiscretechoiceexperimentdce
AT connorsjosephm genomictestingtodeterminedrugresponsemeasuringpreferencesofthepublicandpatientsusingdiscretechoiceexperimentdce
AT marramarcoa genomictestingtodeterminedrugresponsemeasuringpreferencesofthepublicandpatientsusingdiscretechoiceexperimentdce
AT lyndlarryd genomictestingtodeterminedrugresponsemeasuringpreferencesofthepublicandpatientsusingdiscretechoiceexperimentdce
AT marracarloa genomictestingtodeterminedrugresponsemeasuringpreferencesofthepublicandpatientsusingdiscretechoiceexperimentdce