Cargando…

Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle interventions affect patients’ risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MeSy), a pre-stage to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and related complications. An effective lifestyle intervention is the Swedish Björknäs intervention, a 3-year randomized controlled trial in primary care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Sanjib, Carlsson, Katarina Steen, Gerdtham, Ulf-G, Eriksson, Margareta K., Hagberg, Lars, Eliasson, Mats, Johansson, Pia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080672
_version_ 1782291213638959104
author Saha, Sanjib
Carlsson, Katarina Steen
Gerdtham, Ulf-G
Eriksson, Margareta K.
Hagberg, Lars
Eliasson, Mats
Johansson, Pia
author_facet Saha, Sanjib
Carlsson, Katarina Steen
Gerdtham, Ulf-G
Eriksson, Margareta K.
Hagberg, Lars
Eliasson, Mats
Johansson, Pia
author_sort Saha, Sanjib
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lifestyle interventions affect patients’ risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MeSy), a pre-stage to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and related complications. An effective lifestyle intervention is the Swedish Björknäs intervention, a 3-year randomized controlled trial in primary care for MeSy patients. To include future disease-related cost and health consequences in a cost-effectiveness analysis, a simulation model was used to estimate the short-term (3-year) and long-term (lifelong) cost-effectiveness of the Björknäs study. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A Markov micro-simulation model was used to predict the cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for MeSy-related diseases based on ten risk factors. Model inputs were levels of individual risk factors at baseline and at the third year. The model estimated short-term and long-term costs and QALYs for the intervention and control groups. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention was assessed using differences-in-differences approach to compare the changes between the groups in the health care and societal perspectives, using a 3% discount rate. A 95% confidence interval (CI), based on bootstrapping, and sensitivity analyses describe the uncertainty in the estimates. In the short-term, costs are predicted to increase over time in both groups, but less in the intervention group, resulting in an average cost saving/reduction of US$-700 (in 2012, US$1=six point five seven SEK) and US$-500, in the societal and health care perspectives. The long-term estimate also predicts increased costs, but considerably less in the intervention group: US$-7,300 (95% CI: US$-19,700 to US$-1,000) in the societal, and US$-1,500 (95% CI: US$-5,400 to US$2,650) in the health care perspective. As intervention costs were US$211 per participant, the intervention would result in cost saving. Furthermore, in the long-term an estimated 0.46 QALYs (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.69) per participant would be gained. CONCLUSIONS/ SIGNIFICANCE: The Swedish Björknäs study appears to reduce demands on societal and health care resources and increase health-related quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3828270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38282702013-11-16 Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study Saha, Sanjib Carlsson, Katarina Steen Gerdtham, Ulf-G Eriksson, Margareta K. Hagberg, Lars Eliasson, Mats Johansson, Pia PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Lifestyle interventions affect patients’ risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MeSy), a pre-stage to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and related complications. An effective lifestyle intervention is the Swedish Björknäs intervention, a 3-year randomized controlled trial in primary care for MeSy patients. To include future disease-related cost and health consequences in a cost-effectiveness analysis, a simulation model was used to estimate the short-term (3-year) and long-term (lifelong) cost-effectiveness of the Björknäs study. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A Markov micro-simulation model was used to predict the cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for MeSy-related diseases based on ten risk factors. Model inputs were levels of individual risk factors at baseline and at the third year. The model estimated short-term and long-term costs and QALYs for the intervention and control groups. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention was assessed using differences-in-differences approach to compare the changes between the groups in the health care and societal perspectives, using a 3% discount rate. A 95% confidence interval (CI), based on bootstrapping, and sensitivity analyses describe the uncertainty in the estimates. In the short-term, costs are predicted to increase over time in both groups, but less in the intervention group, resulting in an average cost saving/reduction of US$-700 (in 2012, US$1=six point five seven SEK) and US$-500, in the societal and health care perspectives. The long-term estimate also predicts increased costs, but considerably less in the intervention group: US$-7,300 (95% CI: US$-19,700 to US$-1,000) in the societal, and US$-1,500 (95% CI: US$-5,400 to US$2,650) in the health care perspective. As intervention costs were US$211 per participant, the intervention would result in cost saving. Furthermore, in the long-term an estimated 0.46 QALYs (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.69) per participant would be gained. CONCLUSIONS/ SIGNIFICANCE: The Swedish Björknäs study appears to reduce demands on societal and health care resources and increase health-related quality of life. Public Library of Science 2013-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3828270/ /pubmed/24244703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080672 Text en © 2013 Saha et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saha, Sanjib
Carlsson, Katarina Steen
Gerdtham, Ulf-G
Eriksson, Margareta K.
Hagberg, Lars
Eliasson, Mats
Johansson, Pia
Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study
title Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study
title_full Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study
title_fullStr Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study
title_full_unstemmed Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study
title_short Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study
title_sort are lifestyle interventions in primary care cost-effective? – an analysis based on a markov model, differences-in-differences approach and the swedish björknäs study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080672
work_keys_str_mv AT sahasanjib arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy
AT carlssonkatarinasteen arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy
AT gerdthamulfg arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy
AT erikssonmargaretak arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy
AT hagberglars arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy
AT eliassonmats arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy
AT johanssonpia arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy