Cargando…
Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle interventions affect patients’ risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MeSy), a pre-stage to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and related complications. An effective lifestyle intervention is the Swedish Björknäs intervention, a 3-year randomized controlled trial in primary care...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080672 |
_version_ | 1782291213638959104 |
---|---|
author | Saha, Sanjib Carlsson, Katarina Steen Gerdtham, Ulf-G Eriksson, Margareta K. Hagberg, Lars Eliasson, Mats Johansson, Pia |
author_facet | Saha, Sanjib Carlsson, Katarina Steen Gerdtham, Ulf-G Eriksson, Margareta K. Hagberg, Lars Eliasson, Mats Johansson, Pia |
author_sort | Saha, Sanjib |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lifestyle interventions affect patients’ risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MeSy), a pre-stage to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and related complications. An effective lifestyle intervention is the Swedish Björknäs intervention, a 3-year randomized controlled trial in primary care for MeSy patients. To include future disease-related cost and health consequences in a cost-effectiveness analysis, a simulation model was used to estimate the short-term (3-year) and long-term (lifelong) cost-effectiveness of the Björknäs study. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A Markov micro-simulation model was used to predict the cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for MeSy-related diseases based on ten risk factors. Model inputs were levels of individual risk factors at baseline and at the third year. The model estimated short-term and long-term costs and QALYs for the intervention and control groups. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention was assessed using differences-in-differences approach to compare the changes between the groups in the health care and societal perspectives, using a 3% discount rate. A 95% confidence interval (CI), based on bootstrapping, and sensitivity analyses describe the uncertainty in the estimates. In the short-term, costs are predicted to increase over time in both groups, but less in the intervention group, resulting in an average cost saving/reduction of US$-700 (in 2012, US$1=six point five seven SEK) and US$-500, in the societal and health care perspectives. The long-term estimate also predicts increased costs, but considerably less in the intervention group: US$-7,300 (95% CI: US$-19,700 to US$-1,000) in the societal, and US$-1,500 (95% CI: US$-5,400 to US$2,650) in the health care perspective. As intervention costs were US$211 per participant, the intervention would result in cost saving. Furthermore, in the long-term an estimated 0.46 QALYs (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.69) per participant would be gained. CONCLUSIONS/ SIGNIFICANCE: The Swedish Björknäs study appears to reduce demands on societal and health care resources and increase health-related quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3828270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38282702013-11-16 Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study Saha, Sanjib Carlsson, Katarina Steen Gerdtham, Ulf-G Eriksson, Margareta K. Hagberg, Lars Eliasson, Mats Johansson, Pia PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Lifestyle interventions affect patients’ risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MeSy), a pre-stage to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and related complications. An effective lifestyle intervention is the Swedish Björknäs intervention, a 3-year randomized controlled trial in primary care for MeSy patients. To include future disease-related cost and health consequences in a cost-effectiveness analysis, a simulation model was used to estimate the short-term (3-year) and long-term (lifelong) cost-effectiveness of the Björknäs study. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A Markov micro-simulation model was used to predict the cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for MeSy-related diseases based on ten risk factors. Model inputs were levels of individual risk factors at baseline and at the third year. The model estimated short-term and long-term costs and QALYs for the intervention and control groups. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention was assessed using differences-in-differences approach to compare the changes between the groups in the health care and societal perspectives, using a 3% discount rate. A 95% confidence interval (CI), based on bootstrapping, and sensitivity analyses describe the uncertainty in the estimates. In the short-term, costs are predicted to increase over time in both groups, but less in the intervention group, resulting in an average cost saving/reduction of US$-700 (in 2012, US$1=six point five seven SEK) and US$-500, in the societal and health care perspectives. The long-term estimate also predicts increased costs, but considerably less in the intervention group: US$-7,300 (95% CI: US$-19,700 to US$-1,000) in the societal, and US$-1,500 (95% CI: US$-5,400 to US$2,650) in the health care perspective. As intervention costs were US$211 per participant, the intervention would result in cost saving. Furthermore, in the long-term an estimated 0.46 QALYs (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.69) per participant would be gained. CONCLUSIONS/ SIGNIFICANCE: The Swedish Björknäs study appears to reduce demands on societal and health care resources and increase health-related quality of life. Public Library of Science 2013-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3828270/ /pubmed/24244703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080672 Text en © 2013 Saha et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Saha, Sanjib Carlsson, Katarina Steen Gerdtham, Ulf-G Eriksson, Margareta K. Hagberg, Lars Eliasson, Mats Johansson, Pia Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study |
title | Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study |
title_full | Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study |
title_fullStr | Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study |
title_short | Are Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Care Cost-Effective? – An Analysis Based on a Markov Model, Differences-In-Differences Approach and the Swedish Björknäs Study |
title_sort | are lifestyle interventions in primary care cost-effective? – an analysis based on a markov model, differences-in-differences approach and the swedish björknäs study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahasanjib arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy AT carlssonkatarinasteen arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy AT gerdthamulfg arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy AT erikssonmargaretak arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy AT hagberglars arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy AT eliassonmats arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy AT johanssonpia arelifestyleinterventionsinprimarycarecosteffectiveananalysisbasedonamarkovmodeldifferencesindifferencesapproachandtheswedishbjorknasstudy |