Cargando…

Application of the Speed-Duration Relationship to Normalize the Intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training

The tolerable duration of continuous high-intensity exercise is determined by the hyperbolic Speed-tolerable duration (S-t(LIM)) relationship. However, application of the S-t(LIM) relationship to normalize the intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) has yet to be considered, with this t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, Carrie, Wilson, John, Birch, Karen M., Kemi, Ole J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076420
Descripción
Sumario:The tolerable duration of continuous high-intensity exercise is determined by the hyperbolic Speed-tolerable duration (S-t(LIM)) relationship. However, application of the S-t(LIM) relationship to normalize the intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) has yet to be considered, with this the aim of present study. Subjects completed a ramp-incremental test, and series of 4 constant-speed tests to determine the S-t(LIM) relationship. A sub-group of subjects (n = 8) then repeated 4 min bouts of exercise at the speeds predicted to induce intolerance at 4 min (WR(4)), 6 min (WR(6)) and 8 min (WR(8)), interspersed with bouts of 4 min recovery, to the point of exercise intolerance (fixed WR HIIT) on different days, with the aim of establishing the work rate that could be sustained for 960 s (i.e. 4×4 min). A sub-group of subjects (n = 6) also completed 4 bouts of exercise interspersed with 4 min recovery, with each bout continued to the point of exercise intolerance (maximal HIIT) to determine the appropriate protocol for maximizing the amount of high-intensity work that can be completed during 4×4 min HIIT. For fixed WR HIIT t(LIM) of HIIT sessions was 399±81 s for WR(4), 892±181 s for WR(6) and 1517±346 s for WR(8), with total exercise durations all significantly different from each other (P<0.050). For maximal HIIT, there was no difference in t(LIM) of each of the 4 bouts (Bout 1: 229±27 s; Bout 2: 262±37 s; Bout 3: 235±49 s; Bout 4: 235±53 s; P>0.050). However, there was significantly less high-intensity work completed during bouts 2 (153.5±40. 9 m), 3 (136.9±38.9 m), and 4 (136.7±39.3 m), compared with bout 1 (264.9±58.7 m; P>0.050). These data establish that WR(6) provides the appropriate work rate to normalize the intensity of HIIT between subjects. Maximal HIIT provides a protocol which allows the relative contribution of the work rate profile to physiological adaptations to be considered during alternative intensity-matched HIIT protocols.