Cargando…
Application of the Speed-Duration Relationship to Normalize the Intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training
The tolerable duration of continuous high-intensity exercise is determined by the hyperbolic Speed-tolerable duration (S-t(LIM)) relationship. However, application of the S-t(LIM) relationship to normalize the intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) has yet to be considered, with this t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076420 |
_version_ | 1782291220292173824 |
---|---|
author | Ferguson, Carrie Wilson, John Birch, Karen M. Kemi, Ole J. |
author_facet | Ferguson, Carrie Wilson, John Birch, Karen M. Kemi, Ole J. |
author_sort | Ferguson, Carrie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The tolerable duration of continuous high-intensity exercise is determined by the hyperbolic Speed-tolerable duration (S-t(LIM)) relationship. However, application of the S-t(LIM) relationship to normalize the intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) has yet to be considered, with this the aim of present study. Subjects completed a ramp-incremental test, and series of 4 constant-speed tests to determine the S-t(LIM) relationship. A sub-group of subjects (n = 8) then repeated 4 min bouts of exercise at the speeds predicted to induce intolerance at 4 min (WR(4)), 6 min (WR(6)) and 8 min (WR(8)), interspersed with bouts of 4 min recovery, to the point of exercise intolerance (fixed WR HIIT) on different days, with the aim of establishing the work rate that could be sustained for 960 s (i.e. 4×4 min). A sub-group of subjects (n = 6) also completed 4 bouts of exercise interspersed with 4 min recovery, with each bout continued to the point of exercise intolerance (maximal HIIT) to determine the appropriate protocol for maximizing the amount of high-intensity work that can be completed during 4×4 min HIIT. For fixed WR HIIT t(LIM) of HIIT sessions was 399±81 s for WR(4), 892±181 s for WR(6) and 1517±346 s for WR(8), with total exercise durations all significantly different from each other (P<0.050). For maximal HIIT, there was no difference in t(LIM) of each of the 4 bouts (Bout 1: 229±27 s; Bout 2: 262±37 s; Bout 3: 235±49 s; Bout 4: 235±53 s; P>0.050). However, there was significantly less high-intensity work completed during bouts 2 (153.5±40. 9 m), 3 (136.9±38.9 m), and 4 (136.7±39.3 m), compared with bout 1 (264.9±58.7 m; P>0.050). These data establish that WR(6) provides the appropriate work rate to normalize the intensity of HIIT between subjects. Maximal HIIT provides a protocol which allows the relative contribution of the work rate profile to physiological adaptations to be considered during alternative intensity-matched HIIT protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3828304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38283042013-11-16 Application of the Speed-Duration Relationship to Normalize the Intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training Ferguson, Carrie Wilson, John Birch, Karen M. Kemi, Ole J. PLoS One Research Article The tolerable duration of continuous high-intensity exercise is determined by the hyperbolic Speed-tolerable duration (S-t(LIM)) relationship. However, application of the S-t(LIM) relationship to normalize the intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) has yet to be considered, with this the aim of present study. Subjects completed a ramp-incremental test, and series of 4 constant-speed tests to determine the S-t(LIM) relationship. A sub-group of subjects (n = 8) then repeated 4 min bouts of exercise at the speeds predicted to induce intolerance at 4 min (WR(4)), 6 min (WR(6)) and 8 min (WR(8)), interspersed with bouts of 4 min recovery, to the point of exercise intolerance (fixed WR HIIT) on different days, with the aim of establishing the work rate that could be sustained for 960 s (i.e. 4×4 min). A sub-group of subjects (n = 6) also completed 4 bouts of exercise interspersed with 4 min recovery, with each bout continued to the point of exercise intolerance (maximal HIIT) to determine the appropriate protocol for maximizing the amount of high-intensity work that can be completed during 4×4 min HIIT. For fixed WR HIIT t(LIM) of HIIT sessions was 399±81 s for WR(4), 892±181 s for WR(6) and 1517±346 s for WR(8), with total exercise durations all significantly different from each other (P<0.050). For maximal HIIT, there was no difference in t(LIM) of each of the 4 bouts (Bout 1: 229±27 s; Bout 2: 262±37 s; Bout 3: 235±49 s; Bout 4: 235±53 s; P>0.050). However, there was significantly less high-intensity work completed during bouts 2 (153.5±40. 9 m), 3 (136.9±38.9 m), and 4 (136.7±39.3 m), compared with bout 1 (264.9±58.7 m; P>0.050). These data establish that WR(6) provides the appropriate work rate to normalize the intensity of HIIT between subjects. Maximal HIIT provides a protocol which allows the relative contribution of the work rate profile to physiological adaptations to be considered during alternative intensity-matched HIIT protocols. Public Library of Science 2013-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3828304/ /pubmed/24244266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076420 Text en © 2013 Ferguson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ferguson, Carrie Wilson, John Birch, Karen M. Kemi, Ole J. Application of the Speed-Duration Relationship to Normalize the Intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training |
title | Application of the Speed-Duration Relationship to Normalize the Intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training |
title_full | Application of the Speed-Duration Relationship to Normalize the Intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training |
title_fullStr | Application of the Speed-Duration Relationship to Normalize the Intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of the Speed-Duration Relationship to Normalize the Intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training |
title_short | Application of the Speed-Duration Relationship to Normalize the Intensity of High-Intensity Interval Training |
title_sort | application of the speed-duration relationship to normalize the intensity of high-intensity interval training |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fergusoncarrie applicationofthespeeddurationrelationshiptonormalizetheintensityofhighintensityintervaltraining AT wilsonjohn applicationofthespeeddurationrelationshiptonormalizetheintensityofhighintensityintervaltraining AT birchkarenm applicationofthespeeddurationrelationshiptonormalizetheintensityofhighintensityintervaltraining AT kemiolej applicationofthespeeddurationrelationshiptonormalizetheintensityofhighintensityintervaltraining |