Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of spa, SCCmec, and PVL Genotyping of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus as Compared to Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a valuable molecular typing assay used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surveillance and genotyping. However, there are several limitations associated with PFGE. In Alberta, Canada, the significant increase in the number of MRSA isolat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Vincent, Chui, Linda, Louie, Lisa, Simor, Andrew, Golding, George R., Louie, Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079149
_version_ 1782291227588165632
author Li, Vincent
Chui, Linda
Louie, Lisa
Simor, Andrew
Golding, George R.
Louie, Marie
author_facet Li, Vincent
Chui, Linda
Louie, Lisa
Simor, Andrew
Golding, George R.
Louie, Marie
author_sort Li, Vincent
collection PubMed
description Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a valuable molecular typing assay used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surveillance and genotyping. However, there are several limitations associated with PFGE. In Alberta, Canada, the significant increase in the number of MRSA isolates submitted to the Provincial Laboratory for Public Health (ProvLab) for PFGE typing led to the need for an alternative genotyping method. In this study, we describe the transition from PFGE to Staphylococcus protein A (spa), Staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec), and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) typing. A total of 1915 clinical MRSA isolates collected from 2005 to 2009 were used to develop and validate an algorithm for assigning PFGE epidemic types using spa, SCCmec, and PVL typing and the resulting data was used to populate a new Alberta MRSA typing database. An additional 12620 clinical MRSA isolates collected from 2010 to 2012 as part of ongoing routine molecular testing at ProvLab were characterized using the new typing algorithm and the Alberta MRSA typing database. Switching to spa, SCCmec, and PVL from PFGE typing substantially reduced hands-on and turn-around times while maintaining historical PFGE epidemic type designations. This led to an approximate $77,000 reduction in costs from 2010 to 2012. PFGE typing is still required for a small subset of MRSA isolates that have spa types that are rare, novel, or associated with more than one PFGE epidemic type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3828336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38283362013-11-16 Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of spa, SCCmec, and PVL Genotyping of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus as Compared to Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Li, Vincent Chui, Linda Louie, Lisa Simor, Andrew Golding, George R. Louie, Marie PLoS One Research Article Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a valuable molecular typing assay used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) surveillance and genotyping. However, there are several limitations associated with PFGE. In Alberta, Canada, the significant increase in the number of MRSA isolates submitted to the Provincial Laboratory for Public Health (ProvLab) for PFGE typing led to the need for an alternative genotyping method. In this study, we describe the transition from PFGE to Staphylococcus protein A (spa), Staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec), and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) typing. A total of 1915 clinical MRSA isolates collected from 2005 to 2009 were used to develop and validate an algorithm for assigning PFGE epidemic types using spa, SCCmec, and PVL typing and the resulting data was used to populate a new Alberta MRSA typing database. An additional 12620 clinical MRSA isolates collected from 2010 to 2012 as part of ongoing routine molecular testing at ProvLab were characterized using the new typing algorithm and the Alberta MRSA typing database. Switching to spa, SCCmec, and PVL from PFGE typing substantially reduced hands-on and turn-around times while maintaining historical PFGE epidemic type designations. This led to an approximate $77,000 reduction in costs from 2010 to 2012. PFGE typing is still required for a small subset of MRSA isolates that have spa types that are rare, novel, or associated with more than one PFGE epidemic type. Public Library of Science 2013-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3828336/ /pubmed/24244440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079149 Text en © 2013 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Vincent
Chui, Linda
Louie, Lisa
Simor, Andrew
Golding, George R.
Louie, Marie
Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of spa, SCCmec, and PVL Genotyping of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus as Compared to Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis
title Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of spa, SCCmec, and PVL Genotyping of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus as Compared to Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis
title_full Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of spa, SCCmec, and PVL Genotyping of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus as Compared to Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of spa, SCCmec, and PVL Genotyping of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus as Compared to Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of spa, SCCmec, and PVL Genotyping of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus as Compared to Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis
title_short Cost-Effectiveness and Efficacy of spa, SCCmec, and PVL Genotyping of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus as Compared to Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis
title_sort cost-effectiveness and efficacy of spa, sccmec, and pvl genotyping of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus as compared to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079149
work_keys_str_mv AT livincent costeffectivenessandefficacyofspasccmecandpvlgenotypingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusascomparedtopulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis
AT chuilinda costeffectivenessandefficacyofspasccmecandpvlgenotypingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusascomparedtopulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis
AT louielisa costeffectivenessandefficacyofspasccmecandpvlgenotypingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusascomparedtopulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis
AT simorandrew costeffectivenessandefficacyofspasccmecandpvlgenotypingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusascomparedtopulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis
AT goldinggeorger costeffectivenessandefficacyofspasccmecandpvlgenotypingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusascomparedtopulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis
AT louiemarie costeffectivenessandefficacyofspasccmecandpvlgenotypingofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusascomparedtopulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis