Cargando…

Ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The essential clinical diagnostic components of brain death must include evidence for an established etiology capable of causing brain death, two independent clinical confirmations of the absence of all brainstem reflexes and an apnea test, and exclude confounders that can mimic brain de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chassé, Michaël, Glen, Peter, Doyle, Mary-Anne, McIntyre, Lauralyn, English, Shane W, Knoll, Greg, Lizé, Jean-François, Shemie, Sam D, Martin, Claudio, Turgeon, Alexis F, Lauzier, François, Fergusson, Dean A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24206574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-100
_version_ 1782291240253915136
author Chassé, Michaël
Glen, Peter
Doyle, Mary-Anne
McIntyre, Lauralyn
English, Shane W
Knoll, Greg
Lizé, Jean-François
Shemie, Sam D
Martin, Claudio
Turgeon, Alexis F
Lauzier, François
Fergusson, Dean A
author_facet Chassé, Michaël
Glen, Peter
Doyle, Mary-Anne
McIntyre, Lauralyn
English, Shane W
Knoll, Greg
Lizé, Jean-François
Shemie, Sam D
Martin, Claudio
Turgeon, Alexis F
Lauzier, François
Fergusson, Dean A
author_sort Chassé, Michaël
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The essential clinical diagnostic components of brain death must include evidence for an established etiology capable of causing brain death, two independent clinical confirmations of the absence of all brainstem reflexes and an apnea test, and exclude confounders that can mimic brain death. Numerous confounders can render the clinical neurological determination of death (NDD) virtually impossible. As such, clinicians must rely on additional ancillary testing. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis of ancillary testing for the neurological determination of death. The primary objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the accuracy of these ancillary tests compared to the three accepted reference standards: (1) clinical diagnosis, (2) four-vessel angiography and (3) radionuclide imaging. This objective will be investigated using two different populations with different baseline risks of brain death: comatose patients and patients with a neurological determination of death. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central databases for retrospective and prospective diagnostic test studies and interventional studies. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using QUADAS-2, which is used to assess the quality of diagnostic tests. If pooling is appropriate, we will compute parameter estimates using a bivariate model to produce summary receiver operating curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence regions around the summary operating point. Clinical and methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity. DISCUSSION: The results of this project will provide a critical evidence base for the neurological determination of death. The results will help clinicians to select ancillary tests based on the best available evidence. Our systematic review will also identify the strengths and weaknesses in the current evidence for the use of ancillary tests in diagnosing brain death. It will serve as a foundation for further research and the development of prospective studies on currently used or novel techniques for NDD. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42013005907
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3828391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38283912013-11-15 Ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Chassé, Michaël Glen, Peter Doyle, Mary-Anne McIntyre, Lauralyn English, Shane W Knoll, Greg Lizé, Jean-François Shemie, Sam D Martin, Claudio Turgeon, Alexis F Lauzier, François Fergusson, Dean A Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The essential clinical diagnostic components of brain death must include evidence for an established etiology capable of causing brain death, two independent clinical confirmations of the absence of all brainstem reflexes and an apnea test, and exclude confounders that can mimic brain death. Numerous confounders can render the clinical neurological determination of death (NDD) virtually impossible. As such, clinicians must rely on additional ancillary testing. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis of ancillary testing for the neurological determination of death. The primary objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the accuracy of these ancillary tests compared to the three accepted reference standards: (1) clinical diagnosis, (2) four-vessel angiography and (3) radionuclide imaging. This objective will be investigated using two different populations with different baseline risks of brain death: comatose patients and patients with a neurological determination of death. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central databases for retrospective and prospective diagnostic test studies and interventional studies. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using QUADAS-2, which is used to assess the quality of diagnostic tests. If pooling is appropriate, we will compute parameter estimates using a bivariate model to produce summary receiver operating curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity), and 95% confidence regions around the summary operating point. Clinical and methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity. DISCUSSION: The results of this project will provide a critical evidence base for the neurological determination of death. The results will help clinicians to select ancillary tests based on the best available evidence. Our systematic review will also identify the strengths and weaknesses in the current evidence for the use of ancillary tests in diagnosing brain death. It will serve as a foundation for further research and the development of prospective studies on currently used or novel techniques for NDD. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42013005907 BioMed Central 2013-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3828391/ /pubmed/24206574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-100 Text en Copyright © 2013 Chassé et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Chassé, Michaël
Glen, Peter
Doyle, Mary-Anne
McIntyre, Lauralyn
English, Shane W
Knoll, Greg
Lizé, Jean-François
Shemie, Sam D
Martin, Claudio
Turgeon, Alexis F
Lauzier, François
Fergusson, Dean A
Ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort ancillary testing for diagnosis of brain death: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24206574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-100
work_keys_str_mv AT chassemichael ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT glenpeter ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT doylemaryanne ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcintyrelauralyn ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT englishshanew ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT knollgreg ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lizejeanfrancois ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shemiesamd ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinclaudio ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT turgeonalexisf ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lauzierfrancois ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fergussondeana ancillarytestingfordiagnosisofbraindeathaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis