Cargando…

What contributes to good patient outcomes in the home treatment of the severely mentally ill: study protocol of a multi-centre analysis

BACKGROUND: While evidence is available that home treatment could be effective for treating severe mental illness, there is a lack of evidence on what exactly makes home treatment effective. The study presented here aims to develop recommendations for structures and processes in home treatment that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stegbauer, Constance, Goetz, Katja, Bauer, Erik, Bestmann, Beate, Ruprecht, Thomas, Szecsenyi, Joachim, Bramesfeld, Anke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24192048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-283
_version_ 1782291247500623872
author Stegbauer, Constance
Goetz, Katja
Bauer, Erik
Bestmann, Beate
Ruprecht, Thomas
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Bramesfeld, Anke
author_facet Stegbauer, Constance
Goetz, Katja
Bauer, Erik
Bestmann, Beate
Ruprecht, Thomas
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Bramesfeld, Anke
author_sort Stegbauer, Constance
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While evidence is available that home treatment could be effective for treating severe mental illness, there is a lack of evidence on what exactly makes home treatment effective. The study presented here aims to develop recommendations for structures and processes in home treatment that are necessary for its effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: 14 provider networks of home treatment for severe mental illness will be analyzed and compared according to their structures, processes and patient-related outcomes. Data will be drawn from health care claims data, routine assessments of psychosocial functioning, and from questionnaires on structures and processes. The primary outcome will be psychosocial functioning; secondary outcomes, quality of life and days spent in hospital. The relation between structures and processes on one hand side and outcomes on the other side will be identified by multilevel analysis. In addition, focus groups with patients, relatives and network staff will be held to add further insight into relevant processes. All networks will receive individual quality reports, providing them with feedback on the results of this research and benchmarking them against the average. Based on this research, recommendations for processes and structures of home treatment will be developed. DISCUSSION: The research will use longitudinal data on outcomes routinely assessed since 2009 and claims data. Routine data is also used for the assessment of structures and processes. By way of additional questionnaires developed in discussion with providers, further relevant factors can be included. The approach of this study becomes more comprehensive by conducting focus groups with patients, relatives and providers and by having the chance to evaluate the results with the networks by providing feedback of results. Several factors such as outcomes related to regional availability of hospital beds or size of networks might limit this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3828427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38284272013-11-16 What contributes to good patient outcomes in the home treatment of the severely mentally ill: study protocol of a multi-centre analysis Stegbauer, Constance Goetz, Katja Bauer, Erik Bestmann, Beate Ruprecht, Thomas Szecsenyi, Joachim Bramesfeld, Anke BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: While evidence is available that home treatment could be effective for treating severe mental illness, there is a lack of evidence on what exactly makes home treatment effective. The study presented here aims to develop recommendations for structures and processes in home treatment that are necessary for its effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: 14 provider networks of home treatment for severe mental illness will be analyzed and compared according to their structures, processes and patient-related outcomes. Data will be drawn from health care claims data, routine assessments of psychosocial functioning, and from questionnaires on structures and processes. The primary outcome will be psychosocial functioning; secondary outcomes, quality of life and days spent in hospital. The relation between structures and processes on one hand side and outcomes on the other side will be identified by multilevel analysis. In addition, focus groups with patients, relatives and network staff will be held to add further insight into relevant processes. All networks will receive individual quality reports, providing them with feedback on the results of this research and benchmarking them against the average. Based on this research, recommendations for processes and structures of home treatment will be developed. DISCUSSION: The research will use longitudinal data on outcomes routinely assessed since 2009 and claims data. Routine data is also used for the assessment of structures and processes. By way of additional questionnaires developed in discussion with providers, further relevant factors can be included. The approach of this study becomes more comprehensive by conducting focus groups with patients, relatives and providers and by having the chance to evaluate the results with the networks by providing feedback of results. Several factors such as outcomes related to regional availability of hospital beds or size of networks might limit this study. BioMed Central 2013-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3828427/ /pubmed/24192048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-283 Text en Copyright © 2013 Stegbauer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Stegbauer, Constance
Goetz, Katja
Bauer, Erik
Bestmann, Beate
Ruprecht, Thomas
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Bramesfeld, Anke
What contributes to good patient outcomes in the home treatment of the severely mentally ill: study protocol of a multi-centre analysis
title What contributes to good patient outcomes in the home treatment of the severely mentally ill: study protocol of a multi-centre analysis
title_full What contributes to good patient outcomes in the home treatment of the severely mentally ill: study protocol of a multi-centre analysis
title_fullStr What contributes to good patient outcomes in the home treatment of the severely mentally ill: study protocol of a multi-centre analysis
title_full_unstemmed What contributes to good patient outcomes in the home treatment of the severely mentally ill: study protocol of a multi-centre analysis
title_short What contributes to good patient outcomes in the home treatment of the severely mentally ill: study protocol of a multi-centre analysis
title_sort what contributes to good patient outcomes in the home treatment of the severely mentally ill: study protocol of a multi-centre analysis
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24192048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-283
work_keys_str_mv AT stegbauerconstance whatcontributestogoodpatientoutcomesinthehometreatmentoftheseverelymentallyillstudyprotocolofamulticentreanalysis
AT goetzkatja whatcontributestogoodpatientoutcomesinthehometreatmentoftheseverelymentallyillstudyprotocolofamulticentreanalysis
AT bauererik whatcontributestogoodpatientoutcomesinthehometreatmentoftheseverelymentallyillstudyprotocolofamulticentreanalysis
AT bestmannbeate whatcontributestogoodpatientoutcomesinthehometreatmentoftheseverelymentallyillstudyprotocolofamulticentreanalysis
AT ruprechtthomas whatcontributestogoodpatientoutcomesinthehometreatmentoftheseverelymentallyillstudyprotocolofamulticentreanalysis
AT szecsenyijoachim whatcontributestogoodpatientoutcomesinthehometreatmentoftheseverelymentallyillstudyprotocolofamulticentreanalysis
AT bramesfeldanke whatcontributestogoodpatientoutcomesinthehometreatmentoftheseverelymentallyillstudyprotocolofamulticentreanalysis