Cargando…

Optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive instrument, which can be used to estimate the thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and provides an indirect measurement of axonal destruction in multiple sclerosis (MS). The main aim of this study was to find out any corre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fatehi, Farzad, Shaygannejad, Vahid, Mehr, Lida Kiani, Dehghani, Alireza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250852
_version_ 1782291338560012288
author Fatehi, Farzad
Shaygannejad, Vahid
Mehr, Lida Kiani
Dehghani, Alireza
author_facet Fatehi, Farzad
Shaygannejad, Vahid
Mehr, Lida Kiani
Dehghani, Alireza
author_sort Fatehi, Farzad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive instrument, which can be used to estimate the thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and provides an indirect measurement of axonal destruction in multiple sclerosis (MS). The main aim of this study was to find out any correlations between P100 latency in visual evoked potential (VEP) and RNFL thickness. METHODS: The patients with the definite history of optic neuritis regardless of the diagnosis of MS were included. The eyes with the history of blurred vision and increased VEP latency (> 115 milliseconds) were considered as cases and the eyes with normal latency were regarded as controls. RNFL thickness was compared between two groups of cases and controls. In addition, the correlation between VEP P100 latency and RNFL thickness in four quadrants of superior, nasal, inferior and temporal fields was estimated by spearman correlation coefficient. RNFL thickness between the patients with history of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) was also compared to other two subgroups of RRMS and SPMS. RESULTS: There was significant negative correlation between VEP P100 latency and RNFL. In all four quadrants, with increasing VEP latency, RNFL thickness decreased. Furthermore, there was significant correlation between P100 latencies and mean RNFL thickness [Pearson correlation coefficient = -0.527, P < 0.001; RNFL (mean) = (-0.44 ± 0.087) × P100 + (153.6 ± 10.94)]. Comparing RNFL thickness between three groups of CIS, RRMS, and SPSM, no significant difference was detected in RNFL thickness (P > 0.05). Power analysis demonstrated that RNFL average had the highest area under curve. CONCLUSION: OCT does have good correlations with P100 latency, indicating retinal non-myelinated axonal involvement in early stages in addition to the myelinated axonal involvement. However, it cannot be used as the sole test in evaluating visual pathway in optic neuritis and complementary tests as VEPs are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3829235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38292352013-11-18 Optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis patients Fatehi, Farzad Shaygannejad, Vahid Mehr, Lida Kiani Dehghani, Alireza Iran J Neurol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive instrument, which can be used to estimate the thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and provides an indirect measurement of axonal destruction in multiple sclerosis (MS). The main aim of this study was to find out any correlations between P100 latency in visual evoked potential (VEP) and RNFL thickness. METHODS: The patients with the definite history of optic neuritis regardless of the diagnosis of MS were included. The eyes with the history of blurred vision and increased VEP latency (> 115 milliseconds) were considered as cases and the eyes with normal latency were regarded as controls. RNFL thickness was compared between two groups of cases and controls. In addition, the correlation between VEP P100 latency and RNFL thickness in four quadrants of superior, nasal, inferior and temporal fields was estimated by spearman correlation coefficient. RNFL thickness between the patients with history of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) was also compared to other two subgroups of RRMS and SPMS. RESULTS: There was significant negative correlation between VEP P100 latency and RNFL. In all four quadrants, with increasing VEP latency, RNFL thickness decreased. Furthermore, there was significant correlation between P100 latencies and mean RNFL thickness [Pearson correlation coefficient = -0.527, P < 0.001; RNFL (mean) = (-0.44 ± 0.087) × P100 + (153.6 ± 10.94)]. Comparing RNFL thickness between three groups of CIS, RRMS, and SPSM, no significant difference was detected in RNFL thickness (P > 0.05). Power analysis demonstrated that RNFL average had the highest area under curve. CONCLUSION: OCT does have good correlations with P100 latency, indicating retinal non-myelinated axonal involvement in early stages in addition to the myelinated axonal involvement. However, it cannot be used as the sole test in evaluating visual pathway in optic neuritis and complementary tests as VEPs are recommended. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3829235/ /pubmed/24250852 Text en Copyright © 2012 Iranian Neurological Association, and Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Fatehi, Farzad
Shaygannejad, Vahid
Mehr, Lida Kiani
Dehghani, Alireza
Optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis patients
title Optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis patients
title_full Optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis patients
title_fullStr Optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis patients
title_full_unstemmed Optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis patients
title_short Optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis patients
title_sort optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis patients
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250852
work_keys_str_mv AT fatehifarzad opticalcoherencetomographyversusvisualevokedpotentialinmultiplesclerosispatients
AT shaygannejadvahid opticalcoherencetomographyversusvisualevokedpotentialinmultiplesclerosispatients
AT mehrlidakiani opticalcoherencetomographyversusvisualevokedpotentialinmultiplesclerosispatients
AT dehghanialireza opticalcoherencetomographyversusvisualevokedpotentialinmultiplesclerosispatients