Cargando…

Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework

Based on existing data and previous work, a series of studies is proposed as a basis toward a pragmatic early step in transforming toxicity testing. These studies were assembled into a data-driven framework that invokes successive tiers of testing with margin of exposure (MOE) as the primary metric....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Russell S., Philbert, Martin A., Auerbach, Scott S., Wetmore, Barbara A., Devito, Michael J., Cote, Ila, Rowlands, J. Craig, Whelan, Maurice P., Hays, Sean M., Andersen, Melvin E., Meek, M. E. (Bette), Reiter, Lawrence W., Lambert, Jason C., Clewell, Harvey J., Stephens, Martin L., Zhao, Q. Jay, Wesselkamper, Scott C., Flowers, Lynn, Carney, Edward W., Pastoor, Timothy P., Petersen, Dan D., Yauk, Carole L., Nong, Andy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kft178
_version_ 1782291363355688960
author Thomas, Russell S.
Philbert, Martin A.
Auerbach, Scott S.
Wetmore, Barbara A.
Devito, Michael J.
Cote, Ila
Rowlands, J. Craig
Whelan, Maurice P.
Hays, Sean M.
Andersen, Melvin E.
Meek, M. E. (Bette)
Reiter, Lawrence W.
Lambert, Jason C.
Clewell, Harvey J.
Stephens, Martin L.
Zhao, Q. Jay
Wesselkamper, Scott C.
Flowers, Lynn
Carney, Edward W.
Pastoor, Timothy P.
Petersen, Dan D.
Yauk, Carole L.
Nong, Andy
author_facet Thomas, Russell S.
Philbert, Martin A.
Auerbach, Scott S.
Wetmore, Barbara A.
Devito, Michael J.
Cote, Ila
Rowlands, J. Craig
Whelan, Maurice P.
Hays, Sean M.
Andersen, Melvin E.
Meek, M. E. (Bette)
Reiter, Lawrence W.
Lambert, Jason C.
Clewell, Harvey J.
Stephens, Martin L.
Zhao, Q. Jay
Wesselkamper, Scott C.
Flowers, Lynn
Carney, Edward W.
Pastoor, Timothy P.
Petersen, Dan D.
Yauk, Carole L.
Nong, Andy
author_sort Thomas, Russell S.
collection PubMed
description Based on existing data and previous work, a series of studies is proposed as a basis toward a pragmatic early step in transforming toxicity testing. These studies were assembled into a data-driven framework that invokes successive tiers of testing with margin of exposure (MOE) as the primary metric. The first tier of the framework integrates data from high-throughput in vitro assays, in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) pharmacokinetic modeling, and exposure modeling. The in vitro assays are used to separate chemicals based on their relative selectivity in interacting with biological targets and identify the concentration at which these interactions occur. The IVIVE modeling converts in vitro concentrations into external dose for calculation of the point of departure (POD) and comparisons to human exposure estimates to yield a MOE. The second tier involves short-term in vivo studies, expanded pharmacokinetic evaluations, and refined human exposure estimates. The results from the second tier studies provide more accurate estimates of the POD and the MOE. The third tier contains the traditional animal studies currently used to assess chemical safety. In each tier, the POD for selective chemicals is based primarily on endpoints associated with a proposed mode of action, whereas the POD for nonselective chemicals is based on potential biological perturbation. Based on the MOE, a significant percentage of chemicals evaluated in the first 2 tiers could be eliminated from further testing. The framework provides a risk-based and animal-sparing approach to evaluate chemical safety, drawing broadly from previous experience but incorporating technological advances to increase efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3829570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38295702013-11-18 Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework Thomas, Russell S. Philbert, Martin A. Auerbach, Scott S. Wetmore, Barbara A. Devito, Michael J. Cote, Ila Rowlands, J. Craig Whelan, Maurice P. Hays, Sean M. Andersen, Melvin E. Meek, M. E. (Bette) Reiter, Lawrence W. Lambert, Jason C. Clewell, Harvey J. Stephens, Martin L. Zhao, Q. Jay Wesselkamper, Scott C. Flowers, Lynn Carney, Edward W. Pastoor, Timothy P. Petersen, Dan D. Yauk, Carole L. Nong, Andy Toxicol Sci Forum Based on existing data and previous work, a series of studies is proposed as a basis toward a pragmatic early step in transforming toxicity testing. These studies were assembled into a data-driven framework that invokes successive tiers of testing with margin of exposure (MOE) as the primary metric. The first tier of the framework integrates data from high-throughput in vitro assays, in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) pharmacokinetic modeling, and exposure modeling. The in vitro assays are used to separate chemicals based on their relative selectivity in interacting with biological targets and identify the concentration at which these interactions occur. The IVIVE modeling converts in vitro concentrations into external dose for calculation of the point of departure (POD) and comparisons to human exposure estimates to yield a MOE. The second tier involves short-term in vivo studies, expanded pharmacokinetic evaluations, and refined human exposure estimates. The results from the second tier studies provide more accurate estimates of the POD and the MOE. The third tier contains the traditional animal studies currently used to assess chemical safety. In each tier, the POD for selective chemicals is based primarily on endpoints associated with a proposed mode of action, whereas the POD for nonselective chemicals is based on potential biological perturbation. Based on the MOE, a significant percentage of chemicals evaluated in the first 2 tiers could be eliminated from further testing. The framework provides a risk-based and animal-sparing approach to evaluate chemical safety, drawing broadly from previous experience but incorporating technological advances to increase efficiency. Oxford University Press 2013-11 2013-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3829570/ /pubmed/23958734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kft178 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Forum
Thomas, Russell S.
Philbert, Martin A.
Auerbach, Scott S.
Wetmore, Barbara A.
Devito, Michael J.
Cote, Ila
Rowlands, J. Craig
Whelan, Maurice P.
Hays, Sean M.
Andersen, Melvin E.
Meek, M. E. (Bette)
Reiter, Lawrence W.
Lambert, Jason C.
Clewell, Harvey J.
Stephens, Martin L.
Zhao, Q. Jay
Wesselkamper, Scott C.
Flowers, Lynn
Carney, Edward W.
Pastoor, Timothy P.
Petersen, Dan D.
Yauk, Carole L.
Nong, Andy
Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework
title Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework
title_full Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework
title_fullStr Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework
title_short Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework
title_sort incorporating new technologies into toxicity testing and risk assessment: moving from 21st century vision to a data-driven framework
topic Forum
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kft178
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasrussells incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT philbertmartina incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT auerbachscotts incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT wetmorebarbaraa incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT devitomichaelj incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT coteila incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT rowlandsjcraig incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT whelanmauricep incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT haysseanm incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT andersenmelvine incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT meekmebette incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT reiterlawrencew incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT lambertjasonc incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT clewellharveyj incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT stephensmartinl incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT zhaoqjay incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT wesselkamperscottc incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT flowerslynn incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT carneyedwardw incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT pastoortimothyp incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT petersendand incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT yaukcarolel incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework
AT nongandy incorporatingnewtechnologiesintotoxicitytestingandriskassessmentmovingfrom21stcenturyvisiontoadatadrivenframework