Cargando…
Cheap and Nasty? The Potential Perils of Using Management Costs to Identify Global Conservation Priorities
The financial cost of biodiversity conservation varies widely around the world and such costs should be considered when identifying countries to best focus conservation investments. Previous global prioritizations have been based on global models for protected area management costs, but this metric...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080893 |
_version_ | 1782291413244837888 |
---|---|
author | McCreless, Erin Visconti, Piero Carwardine, Josie Wilcox, Chris Smith, Robert J. |
author_facet | McCreless, Erin Visconti, Piero Carwardine, Josie Wilcox, Chris Smith, Robert J. |
author_sort | McCreless, Erin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The financial cost of biodiversity conservation varies widely around the world and such costs should be considered when identifying countries to best focus conservation investments. Previous global prioritizations have been based on global models for protected area management costs, but this metric may be related to other factors that negatively influence the effectiveness and social impacts of conservation. Here we investigate such relationships and first show that countries with low predicted costs are less politically stable. Local support and capacity can mitigate the impacts of such instability, but we also found that these countries have less civil society involvement in conservation. Therefore, externally funded projects in these countries must rely on government agencies for implementation. This can be problematic, as our analyses show that governments in countries with low predicted costs score poorly on indices of corruption, bureaucratic quality and human rights. Taken together, our results demonstrate that using national-level estimates for protected area management costs to set global conservation priorities is simplistic, as projects in apparently low-cost countries are less likely to succeed and more likely to have negative impacts on people. We identify the need for an improved approach to develop global conservation cost metrics that better capture the true costs of avoiding or overcoming such problems. Critically, conservation scientists must engage with practitioners to better understand and implement context-specific solutions. This approach assumes that measures of conservation costs, like measures of conservation value, are organization specific, and would bring a much-needed focus on reducing the negative impacts of conservation to develop projects that benefit people and biodiversity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3829910 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38299102013-11-20 Cheap and Nasty? The Potential Perils of Using Management Costs to Identify Global Conservation Priorities McCreless, Erin Visconti, Piero Carwardine, Josie Wilcox, Chris Smith, Robert J. PLoS One Research Article The financial cost of biodiversity conservation varies widely around the world and such costs should be considered when identifying countries to best focus conservation investments. Previous global prioritizations have been based on global models for protected area management costs, but this metric may be related to other factors that negatively influence the effectiveness and social impacts of conservation. Here we investigate such relationships and first show that countries with low predicted costs are less politically stable. Local support and capacity can mitigate the impacts of such instability, but we also found that these countries have less civil society involvement in conservation. Therefore, externally funded projects in these countries must rely on government agencies for implementation. This can be problematic, as our analyses show that governments in countries with low predicted costs score poorly on indices of corruption, bureaucratic quality and human rights. Taken together, our results demonstrate that using national-level estimates for protected area management costs to set global conservation priorities is simplistic, as projects in apparently low-cost countries are less likely to succeed and more likely to have negative impacts on people. We identify the need for an improved approach to develop global conservation cost metrics that better capture the true costs of avoiding or overcoming such problems. Critically, conservation scientists must engage with practitioners to better understand and implement context-specific solutions. This approach assumes that measures of conservation costs, like measures of conservation value, are organization specific, and would bring a much-needed focus on reducing the negative impacts of conservation to develop projects that benefit people and biodiversity. Public Library of Science 2013-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3829910/ /pubmed/24260502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080893 Text en © 2013 McCreless et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McCreless, Erin Visconti, Piero Carwardine, Josie Wilcox, Chris Smith, Robert J. Cheap and Nasty? The Potential Perils of Using Management Costs to Identify Global Conservation Priorities |
title | Cheap and Nasty? The Potential Perils of Using Management Costs to Identify Global Conservation Priorities |
title_full | Cheap and Nasty? The Potential Perils of Using Management Costs to Identify Global Conservation Priorities |
title_fullStr | Cheap and Nasty? The Potential Perils of Using Management Costs to Identify Global Conservation Priorities |
title_full_unstemmed | Cheap and Nasty? The Potential Perils of Using Management Costs to Identify Global Conservation Priorities |
title_short | Cheap and Nasty? The Potential Perils of Using Management Costs to Identify Global Conservation Priorities |
title_sort | cheap and nasty? the potential perils of using management costs to identify global conservation priorities |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080893 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccrelesserin cheapandnastythepotentialperilsofusingmanagementcoststoidentifyglobalconservationpriorities AT viscontipiero cheapandnastythepotentialperilsofusingmanagementcoststoidentifyglobalconservationpriorities AT carwardinejosie cheapandnastythepotentialperilsofusingmanagementcoststoidentifyglobalconservationpriorities AT wilcoxchris cheapandnastythepotentialperilsofusingmanagementcoststoidentifyglobalconservationpriorities AT smithrobertj cheapandnastythepotentialperilsofusingmanagementcoststoidentifyglobalconservationpriorities |