Cargando…

Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages

Macrophage polarization is increasingly recognised as an important pathogenetic factor in inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Proinflammatory M1 macrophages promote T helper (Th) 1 responses and show tumoricidal activity. M2 macrophages contribute to tissue repair and promote Th2 responses. CD68 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barros, Mário Henrique M., Hauck, Franziska, Dreyer, Johannes H., Kempkes, Bettina, Niedobitek, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080908
_version_ 1782291418096599040
author Barros, Mário Henrique M.
Hauck, Franziska
Dreyer, Johannes H.
Kempkes, Bettina
Niedobitek, Gerald
author_facet Barros, Mário Henrique M.
Hauck, Franziska
Dreyer, Johannes H.
Kempkes, Bettina
Niedobitek, Gerald
author_sort Barros, Mário Henrique M.
collection PubMed
description Macrophage polarization is increasingly recognised as an important pathogenetic factor in inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Proinflammatory M1 macrophages promote T helper (Th) 1 responses and show tumoricidal activity. M2 macrophages contribute to tissue repair and promote Th2 responses. CD68 and CD163 are used to identify macrophages in tissue sections. However, characterisation of polarised macrophages in situ has remained difficult. Macrophage polarisation is regulated by transcription factors, pSTAT1 and RBP-J for M1, and CMAF for M2. We reasoned that double-labelling immunohistochemistry for the detection of macrophage markers together with transcription factors may be suitable to characterise macrophage polarisation in situ. To test this hypothesis, we have studied conditions associated with Th1- and Th2-predominant immune responses: infectious mononucleosis and Crohn’s disease for Th1 and allergic nasal polyps, oxyuriasis, wound healing and foreign body granulomas for predominant Th2 response. In all situations, CD163+ cells usually outnumbered CD68+ cells. Moreover, CD163+ cells, usually considered as M2 macrophages, co-expressing pSTAT1 and RBP-J were found in all conditions examined. The numbers of putative M1 macrophages were higher in Th1- than in Th2-associated diseases, while more M2 macrophages were seen in Th2- than in Th1 related disorders. In most Th1-related diseases, the balance of M1 over M2 cells was shifted towards M1 cells, while the reverse was observed for Th2-related conditions. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed two distinct clusters: cluster I included Th1 diseases together with cases with high numbers of CD163+pSTAT1+, CD68+pSTAT1+, CD163+RBP-J+ and CD68+RBP-J+ macrophages; cluster II comprised Th2 conditions together with cases displaying high numbers of CD163+CMAF+ and CD68+CMAF+ macrophages. These results suggest that the detection of pSTAT1, RBP-J, and CMAF in the context of CD68 or CD163 expression is a suitable tool for the characterisation of macrophage polarisation in situ. Furthermore, CD163 cannot be considered a reliable M2 marker when used on its own.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3829941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38299412013-11-20 Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages Barros, Mário Henrique M. Hauck, Franziska Dreyer, Johannes H. Kempkes, Bettina Niedobitek, Gerald PLoS One Research Article Macrophage polarization is increasingly recognised as an important pathogenetic factor in inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Proinflammatory M1 macrophages promote T helper (Th) 1 responses and show tumoricidal activity. M2 macrophages contribute to tissue repair and promote Th2 responses. CD68 and CD163 are used to identify macrophages in tissue sections. However, characterisation of polarised macrophages in situ has remained difficult. Macrophage polarisation is regulated by transcription factors, pSTAT1 and RBP-J for M1, and CMAF for M2. We reasoned that double-labelling immunohistochemistry for the detection of macrophage markers together with transcription factors may be suitable to characterise macrophage polarisation in situ. To test this hypothesis, we have studied conditions associated with Th1- and Th2-predominant immune responses: infectious mononucleosis and Crohn’s disease for Th1 and allergic nasal polyps, oxyuriasis, wound healing and foreign body granulomas for predominant Th2 response. In all situations, CD163+ cells usually outnumbered CD68+ cells. Moreover, CD163+ cells, usually considered as M2 macrophages, co-expressing pSTAT1 and RBP-J were found in all conditions examined. The numbers of putative M1 macrophages were higher in Th1- than in Th2-associated diseases, while more M2 macrophages were seen in Th2- than in Th1 related disorders. In most Th1-related diseases, the balance of M1 over M2 cells was shifted towards M1 cells, while the reverse was observed for Th2-related conditions. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed two distinct clusters: cluster I included Th1 diseases together with cases with high numbers of CD163+pSTAT1+, CD68+pSTAT1+, CD163+RBP-J+ and CD68+RBP-J+ macrophages; cluster II comprised Th2 conditions together with cases displaying high numbers of CD163+CMAF+ and CD68+CMAF+ macrophages. These results suggest that the detection of pSTAT1, RBP-J, and CMAF in the context of CD68 or CD163 expression is a suitable tool for the characterisation of macrophage polarisation in situ. Furthermore, CD163 cannot be considered a reliable M2 marker when used on its own. Public Library of Science 2013-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3829941/ /pubmed/24260507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080908 Text en © 2013 Barros et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barros, Mário Henrique M.
Hauck, Franziska
Dreyer, Johannes H.
Kempkes, Bettina
Niedobitek, Gerald
Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages
title Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages
title_full Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages
title_fullStr Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages
title_full_unstemmed Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages
title_short Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages
title_sort macrophage polarisation: an immunohistochemical approach for identifying m1 and m2 macrophages
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080908
work_keys_str_mv AT barrosmariohenriquem macrophagepolarisationanimmunohistochemicalapproachforidentifyingm1andm2macrophages
AT hauckfranziska macrophagepolarisationanimmunohistochemicalapproachforidentifyingm1andm2macrophages
AT dreyerjohannesh macrophagepolarisationanimmunohistochemicalapproachforidentifyingm1andm2macrophages
AT kempkesbettina macrophagepolarisationanimmunohistochemicalapproachforidentifyingm1andm2macrophages
AT niedobitekgerald macrophagepolarisationanimmunohistochemicalapproachforidentifyingm1andm2macrophages