Cargando…
Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation
Nearly all herbivorous arthropods make foraging-decisions on individual leaves, yet systematic investigations of the adaptive significance and ecological factors structuring these decisions are rare with most attention given to chewing herbivores. This study investigated why an intracellular feeding...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080911 |
_version_ | 1782291422823579648 |
---|---|
author | Fiene, Justin Kalns, Lauren Nansen, Christian Bernal, Julio Harris, Marvin Sword, Gregory A. |
author_facet | Fiene, Justin Kalns, Lauren Nansen, Christian Bernal, Julio Harris, Marvin Sword, Gregory A. |
author_sort | Fiene, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nearly all herbivorous arthropods make foraging-decisions on individual leaves, yet systematic investigations of the adaptive significance and ecological factors structuring these decisions are rare with most attention given to chewing herbivores. This study investigated why an intracellular feeding herbivore, Western flower thrips (WFT) Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande, generally avoids feeding on the adaxial leaf surface of cotton cotyledons. WFT showed a significant aversion to adaxial-feeding even when excised-cotyledons were turned up-side (abaxial-side ‘up’), suggesting that negative-phototaxis was not a primary cause of thrips foraging patterns. No-choice bioassays in which individual WFT females were confined to either the abaxial or adaxial leaf surface showed that 35% fewer offspring were produced when only adaxial feeding was allowed, which coincided with 32% less plant feeding on that surface. To test the hypothesis that leaf biomechanical properties inhibited thrips feeding on the adaxial surface, we used a penetrometer to measure two variables related to the ‘toughness’ of each leaf surface. Neither variable negatively co-varied with feeding. Thus, while avoiding the upper leaf surface was an adaptive foraging strategy, the proximate cause remains to be elucidated, but is likely due, in part, to certain leaf properties that inhibit feeding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3829965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38299652013-11-20 Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation Fiene, Justin Kalns, Lauren Nansen, Christian Bernal, Julio Harris, Marvin Sword, Gregory A. PLoS One Research Article Nearly all herbivorous arthropods make foraging-decisions on individual leaves, yet systematic investigations of the adaptive significance and ecological factors structuring these decisions are rare with most attention given to chewing herbivores. This study investigated why an intracellular feeding herbivore, Western flower thrips (WFT) Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande, generally avoids feeding on the adaxial leaf surface of cotton cotyledons. WFT showed a significant aversion to adaxial-feeding even when excised-cotyledons were turned up-side (abaxial-side ‘up’), suggesting that negative-phototaxis was not a primary cause of thrips foraging patterns. No-choice bioassays in which individual WFT females were confined to either the abaxial or adaxial leaf surface showed that 35% fewer offspring were produced when only adaxial feeding was allowed, which coincided with 32% less plant feeding on that surface. To test the hypothesis that leaf biomechanical properties inhibited thrips feeding on the adaxial surface, we used a penetrometer to measure two variables related to the ‘toughness’ of each leaf surface. Neither variable negatively co-varied with feeding. Thus, while avoiding the upper leaf surface was an adaptive foraging strategy, the proximate cause remains to be elucidated, but is likely due, in part, to certain leaf properties that inhibit feeding. Public Library of Science 2013-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3829965/ /pubmed/24260510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080911 Text en © 2013 Fiene et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fiene, Justin Kalns, Lauren Nansen, Christian Bernal, Julio Harris, Marvin Sword, Gregory A. Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation |
title | Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation |
title_full | Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation |
title_fullStr | Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation |
title_full_unstemmed | Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation |
title_short | Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation |
title_sort | foraging on individual leaves by an intracellular feeding insect is not associated with leaf biomechanical properties or leaf orientation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080911 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fienejustin foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation AT kalnslauren foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation AT nansenchristian foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation AT bernaljulio foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation AT harrismarvin foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation AT swordgregorya foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation |