Cargando…

Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation

Nearly all herbivorous arthropods make foraging-decisions on individual leaves, yet systematic investigations of the adaptive significance and ecological factors structuring these decisions are rare with most attention given to chewing herbivores. This study investigated why an intracellular feeding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiene, Justin, Kalns, Lauren, Nansen, Christian, Bernal, Julio, Harris, Marvin, Sword, Gregory A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080911
_version_ 1782291422823579648
author Fiene, Justin
Kalns, Lauren
Nansen, Christian
Bernal, Julio
Harris, Marvin
Sword, Gregory A.
author_facet Fiene, Justin
Kalns, Lauren
Nansen, Christian
Bernal, Julio
Harris, Marvin
Sword, Gregory A.
author_sort Fiene, Justin
collection PubMed
description Nearly all herbivorous arthropods make foraging-decisions on individual leaves, yet systematic investigations of the adaptive significance and ecological factors structuring these decisions are rare with most attention given to chewing herbivores. This study investigated why an intracellular feeding herbivore, Western flower thrips (WFT) Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande, generally avoids feeding on the adaxial leaf surface of cotton cotyledons. WFT showed a significant aversion to adaxial-feeding even when excised-cotyledons were turned up-side (abaxial-side ‘up’), suggesting that negative-phototaxis was not a primary cause of thrips foraging patterns. No-choice bioassays in which individual WFT females were confined to either the abaxial or adaxial leaf surface showed that 35% fewer offspring were produced when only adaxial feeding was allowed, which coincided with 32% less plant feeding on that surface. To test the hypothesis that leaf biomechanical properties inhibited thrips feeding on the adaxial surface, we used a penetrometer to measure two variables related to the ‘toughness’ of each leaf surface. Neither variable negatively co-varied with feeding. Thus, while avoiding the upper leaf surface was an adaptive foraging strategy, the proximate cause remains to be elucidated, but is likely due, in part, to certain leaf properties that inhibit feeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3829965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38299652013-11-20 Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation Fiene, Justin Kalns, Lauren Nansen, Christian Bernal, Julio Harris, Marvin Sword, Gregory A. PLoS One Research Article Nearly all herbivorous arthropods make foraging-decisions on individual leaves, yet systematic investigations of the adaptive significance and ecological factors structuring these decisions are rare with most attention given to chewing herbivores. This study investigated why an intracellular feeding herbivore, Western flower thrips (WFT) Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande, generally avoids feeding on the adaxial leaf surface of cotton cotyledons. WFT showed a significant aversion to adaxial-feeding even when excised-cotyledons were turned up-side (abaxial-side ‘up’), suggesting that negative-phototaxis was not a primary cause of thrips foraging patterns. No-choice bioassays in which individual WFT females were confined to either the abaxial or adaxial leaf surface showed that 35% fewer offspring were produced when only adaxial feeding was allowed, which coincided with 32% less plant feeding on that surface. To test the hypothesis that leaf biomechanical properties inhibited thrips feeding on the adaxial surface, we used a penetrometer to measure two variables related to the ‘toughness’ of each leaf surface. Neither variable negatively co-varied with feeding. Thus, while avoiding the upper leaf surface was an adaptive foraging strategy, the proximate cause remains to be elucidated, but is likely due, in part, to certain leaf properties that inhibit feeding. Public Library of Science 2013-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3829965/ /pubmed/24260510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080911 Text en © 2013 Fiene et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fiene, Justin
Kalns, Lauren
Nansen, Christian
Bernal, Julio
Harris, Marvin
Sword, Gregory A.
Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation
title Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation
title_full Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation
title_fullStr Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation
title_full_unstemmed Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation
title_short Foraging on Individual Leaves by an Intracellular Feeding Insect Is Not Associated with Leaf Biomechanical Properties or Leaf Orientation
title_sort foraging on individual leaves by an intracellular feeding insect is not associated with leaf biomechanical properties or leaf orientation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3829965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080911
work_keys_str_mv AT fienejustin foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation
AT kalnslauren foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation
AT nansenchristian foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation
AT bernaljulio foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation
AT harrismarvin foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation
AT swordgregorya foragingonindividualleavesbyanintracellularfeedinginsectisnotassociatedwithleafbiomechanicalpropertiesorleaforientation