Cargando…

Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis

BACKGROUND: Severe, drug-resistant gastroparesis is a debilitating condition. Several, but not all, patients can get significant relief from nausea and vomiting by gastric electrical stimulation (GES). A trial of temporary, endoscopically delivered GES may be of predictive value to select patients f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G., Dexter, Simon P.L., Sarela, Abeezar I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250062
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.118833
_version_ 1782291441160028160
author Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G.
Dexter, Simon P.L.
Sarela, Abeezar I.
author_facet Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G.
Dexter, Simon P.L.
Sarela, Abeezar I.
author_sort Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Severe, drug-resistant gastroparesis is a debilitating condition. Several, but not all, patients can get significant relief from nausea and vomiting by gastric electrical stimulation (GES). A trial of temporary, endoscopically delivered GES may be of predictive value to select patients for laparoscopic-implantation of a permanent GES device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a clinical audit of consecutive gastroparesis patients, who had been selected for GES, from May 2008 to January 2012. Delayed gastric emptying was diagnosed by scintigraphy of ≥50% global improvement in symptom-severity and well-being was a good response. RESULTS: There were 71 patients (51 women, 72%) with a median age of 42 years (range: 14-69). The aetiology of gastroparesis was idiopathic (43 patients, 61%), diabetes (15, 21%), or post-surgical (anti-reflux surgery, 6 patients; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 3; subtotal gastrectomy, 1; cardiomyotomy, 1; other gastric surgery, 2) (18%). At presentation, oral nutrition was supplemented by naso-jejunal tube feeding in 7 patients, surgical jejunostomy in 8, or parenterally in 1 (total 16 patients; 22%). Previous intervention included endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin (botox) into the pylorus in 16 patients (22%), pyloroplasty in 2, distal gastrectomy in 1, and gastrojejunostomy in 1. It was decided to directly proceed with permanent GES in 4 patients. Of the remaining, 51 patients have currently completed a trial of temporary stimulation and 39 (77%) had a good response and were selected for permanent GES, which has been completed in 35 patients. Outcome data are currently available for 31 patients (idiopathic, 21 patients; diabetes, 3; post-surgical, 7) with a median follow-up period of 10 months (1-28); 22 patients (71%) had a good response to permanent GES, these included 14 (68%) with idiopathic, 5 (71%) with post-surgical, and remaining 3 with diabetic gastroparesis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 71% of well-selected patients with intractable gastroparesis had good response to permanent GES at follow-up of up to 2 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3830135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38301352013-11-18 Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G. Dexter, Simon P.L. Sarela, Abeezar I. J Minim Access Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Severe, drug-resistant gastroparesis is a debilitating condition. Several, but not all, patients can get significant relief from nausea and vomiting by gastric electrical stimulation (GES). A trial of temporary, endoscopically delivered GES may be of predictive value to select patients for laparoscopic-implantation of a permanent GES device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a clinical audit of consecutive gastroparesis patients, who had been selected for GES, from May 2008 to January 2012. Delayed gastric emptying was diagnosed by scintigraphy of ≥50% global improvement in symptom-severity and well-being was a good response. RESULTS: There were 71 patients (51 women, 72%) with a median age of 42 years (range: 14-69). The aetiology of gastroparesis was idiopathic (43 patients, 61%), diabetes (15, 21%), or post-surgical (anti-reflux surgery, 6 patients; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 3; subtotal gastrectomy, 1; cardiomyotomy, 1; other gastric surgery, 2) (18%). At presentation, oral nutrition was supplemented by naso-jejunal tube feeding in 7 patients, surgical jejunostomy in 8, or parenterally in 1 (total 16 patients; 22%). Previous intervention included endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin (botox) into the pylorus in 16 patients (22%), pyloroplasty in 2, distal gastrectomy in 1, and gastrojejunostomy in 1. It was decided to directly proceed with permanent GES in 4 patients. Of the remaining, 51 patients have currently completed a trial of temporary stimulation and 39 (77%) had a good response and were selected for permanent GES, which has been completed in 35 patients. Outcome data are currently available for 31 patients (idiopathic, 21 patients; diabetes, 3; post-surgical, 7) with a median follow-up period of 10 months (1-28); 22 patients (71%) had a good response to permanent GES, these included 14 (68%) with idiopathic, 5 (71%) with post-surgical, and remaining 3 with diabetic gastroparesis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 71% of well-selected patients with intractable gastroparesis had good response to permanent GES at follow-up of up to 2 years. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3830135/ /pubmed/24250062 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.118833 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G.
Dexter, Simon P.L.
Sarela, Abeezar I.
Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis
title Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis
title_full Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis
title_fullStr Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis
title_full_unstemmed Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis
title_short Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis
title_sort gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250062
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.118833
work_keys_str_mv AT jayanthinagavenkateshg gastricelectricalstimulationfortreatmentofclinicallyseveregastroparesis
AT dextersimonpl gastricelectricalstimulationfortreatmentofclinicallyseveregastroparesis
AT sarelaabeezari gastricelectricalstimulationfortreatmentofclinicallyseveregastroparesis
AT gastricelectricalstimulationfortreatmentofclinicallyseveregastroparesis