Cargando…
Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis
BACKGROUND: Severe, drug-resistant gastroparesis is a debilitating condition. Several, but not all, patients can get significant relief from nausea and vomiting by gastric electrical stimulation (GES). A trial of temporary, endoscopically delivered GES may be of predictive value to select patients f...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250062 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.118833 |
_version_ | 1782291441160028160 |
---|---|
author | Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G. Dexter, Simon P.L. Sarela, Abeezar I. |
author_facet | Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G. Dexter, Simon P.L. Sarela, Abeezar I. |
author_sort | Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Severe, drug-resistant gastroparesis is a debilitating condition. Several, but not all, patients can get significant relief from nausea and vomiting by gastric electrical stimulation (GES). A trial of temporary, endoscopically delivered GES may be of predictive value to select patients for laparoscopic-implantation of a permanent GES device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a clinical audit of consecutive gastroparesis patients, who had been selected for GES, from May 2008 to January 2012. Delayed gastric emptying was diagnosed by scintigraphy of ≥50% global improvement in symptom-severity and well-being was a good response. RESULTS: There were 71 patients (51 women, 72%) with a median age of 42 years (range: 14-69). The aetiology of gastroparesis was idiopathic (43 patients, 61%), diabetes (15, 21%), or post-surgical (anti-reflux surgery, 6 patients; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 3; subtotal gastrectomy, 1; cardiomyotomy, 1; other gastric surgery, 2) (18%). At presentation, oral nutrition was supplemented by naso-jejunal tube feeding in 7 patients, surgical jejunostomy in 8, or parenterally in 1 (total 16 patients; 22%). Previous intervention included endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin (botox) into the pylorus in 16 patients (22%), pyloroplasty in 2, distal gastrectomy in 1, and gastrojejunostomy in 1. It was decided to directly proceed with permanent GES in 4 patients. Of the remaining, 51 patients have currently completed a trial of temporary stimulation and 39 (77%) had a good response and were selected for permanent GES, which has been completed in 35 patients. Outcome data are currently available for 31 patients (idiopathic, 21 patients; diabetes, 3; post-surgical, 7) with a median follow-up period of 10 months (1-28); 22 patients (71%) had a good response to permanent GES, these included 14 (68%) with idiopathic, 5 (71%) with post-surgical, and remaining 3 with diabetic gastroparesis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 71% of well-selected patients with intractable gastroparesis had good response to permanent GES at follow-up of up to 2 years. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3830135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38301352013-11-18 Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G. Dexter, Simon P.L. Sarela, Abeezar I. J Minim Access Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Severe, drug-resistant gastroparesis is a debilitating condition. Several, but not all, patients can get significant relief from nausea and vomiting by gastric electrical stimulation (GES). A trial of temporary, endoscopically delivered GES may be of predictive value to select patients for laparoscopic-implantation of a permanent GES device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a clinical audit of consecutive gastroparesis patients, who had been selected for GES, from May 2008 to January 2012. Delayed gastric emptying was diagnosed by scintigraphy of ≥50% global improvement in symptom-severity and well-being was a good response. RESULTS: There were 71 patients (51 women, 72%) with a median age of 42 years (range: 14-69). The aetiology of gastroparesis was idiopathic (43 patients, 61%), diabetes (15, 21%), or post-surgical (anti-reflux surgery, 6 patients; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 3; subtotal gastrectomy, 1; cardiomyotomy, 1; other gastric surgery, 2) (18%). At presentation, oral nutrition was supplemented by naso-jejunal tube feeding in 7 patients, surgical jejunostomy in 8, or parenterally in 1 (total 16 patients; 22%). Previous intervention included endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin (botox) into the pylorus in 16 patients (22%), pyloroplasty in 2, distal gastrectomy in 1, and gastrojejunostomy in 1. It was decided to directly proceed with permanent GES in 4 patients. Of the remaining, 51 patients have currently completed a trial of temporary stimulation and 39 (77%) had a good response and were selected for permanent GES, which has been completed in 35 patients. Outcome data are currently available for 31 patients (idiopathic, 21 patients; diabetes, 3; post-surgical, 7) with a median follow-up period of 10 months (1-28); 22 patients (71%) had a good response to permanent GES, these included 14 (68%) with idiopathic, 5 (71%) with post-surgical, and remaining 3 with diabetic gastroparesis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 71% of well-selected patients with intractable gastroparesis had good response to permanent GES at follow-up of up to 2 years. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3830135/ /pubmed/24250062 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.118833 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh G. Dexter, Simon P.L. Sarela, Abeezar I. Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis |
title | Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis |
title_full | Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis |
title_fullStr | Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis |
title_short | Gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis |
title_sort | gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of clinically severe gastroparesis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250062 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.118833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jayanthinagavenkateshg gastricelectricalstimulationfortreatmentofclinicallyseveregastroparesis AT dextersimonpl gastricelectricalstimulationfortreatmentofclinicallyseveregastroparesis AT sarelaabeezari gastricelectricalstimulationfortreatmentofclinicallyseveregastroparesis AT gastricelectricalstimulationfortreatmentofclinicallyseveregastroparesis |