Cargando…

Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

We aimed to compare the effectiveness of standardized and individualized acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic low back pain. A single-center randomized controlled single-blind trial was performed in a general medical practice in Germany run by a Chinese-born medical doctor trained in weste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pach, Daniel, Yang-Strobel, Xiaoli, Lüdtke, Rainer, Roll, Stephanie, Icke, Katja, Brinkhaus, Benno, Witt, Claudia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/125937
_version_ 1782291534385774592
author Pach, Daniel
Yang-Strobel, Xiaoli
Lüdtke, Rainer
Roll, Stephanie
Icke, Katja
Brinkhaus, Benno
Witt, Claudia M.
author_facet Pach, Daniel
Yang-Strobel, Xiaoli
Lüdtke, Rainer
Roll, Stephanie
Icke, Katja
Brinkhaus, Benno
Witt, Claudia M.
author_sort Pach, Daniel
collection PubMed
description We aimed to compare the effectiveness of standardized and individualized acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic low back pain. A single-center randomized controlled single-blind trial was performed in a general medical practice in Germany run by a Chinese-born medical doctor trained in western and Chinese medicine. One hundred and fifty outpatients with chronic low back pain were randomly allocated to two groups (78 standardized and 72 individualized acupuncture). Patients received either standardized acupuncture or individualized acupuncture. Treatment encompassed between 10 and 15 treatments based on individual symptoms with two treatments per week. The main outcome measure was the area under the curve (AUC) summarizing eight weeks of daily rated pain severity measured with a visual analogue scale (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst imaginable pain). No significant differences between groups were observed for the AUC (individualized acupuncture mean: 1768.7 (95% CI, 1460.4; 2077.1); standardized acupuncture 1482.9 (1177.2; 1788.7); group difference, 285.8 (−33.9; 605.5) P = 0.080). In this single-center trial, individualized acupuncture was not superior to standardized acupuncture for patients suffering from chronic pain. As a next step, a multicenter noninferiority study should be performed to investigate whether standardised acupuncture treatment for chronic low back pain might be applicable in a broader usual care setting. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00758017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3830844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38308442013-11-28 Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Pach, Daniel Yang-Strobel, Xiaoli Lüdtke, Rainer Roll, Stephanie Icke, Katja Brinkhaus, Benno Witt, Claudia M. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article We aimed to compare the effectiveness of standardized and individualized acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic low back pain. A single-center randomized controlled single-blind trial was performed in a general medical practice in Germany run by a Chinese-born medical doctor trained in western and Chinese medicine. One hundred and fifty outpatients with chronic low back pain were randomly allocated to two groups (78 standardized and 72 individualized acupuncture). Patients received either standardized acupuncture or individualized acupuncture. Treatment encompassed between 10 and 15 treatments based on individual symptoms with two treatments per week. The main outcome measure was the area under the curve (AUC) summarizing eight weeks of daily rated pain severity measured with a visual analogue scale (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst imaginable pain). No significant differences between groups were observed for the AUC (individualized acupuncture mean: 1768.7 (95% CI, 1460.4; 2077.1); standardized acupuncture 1482.9 (1177.2; 1788.7); group difference, 285.8 (−33.9; 605.5) P = 0.080). In this single-center trial, individualized acupuncture was not superior to standardized acupuncture for patients suffering from chronic pain. As a next step, a multicenter noninferiority study should be performed to investigate whether standardised acupuncture treatment for chronic low back pain might be applicable in a broader usual care setting. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00758017. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3830844/ /pubmed/24288556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/125937 Text en Copyright © 2013 Daniel Pach et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pach, Daniel
Yang-Strobel, Xiaoli
Lüdtke, Rainer
Roll, Stephanie
Icke, Katja
Brinkhaus, Benno
Witt, Claudia M.
Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort standardized versus individualized acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/125937
work_keys_str_mv AT pachdaniel standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yangstrobelxiaoli standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ludtkerainer standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rollstephanie standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ickekatja standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brinkhausbenno standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wittclaudiam standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial