Cargando…
Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
We aimed to compare the effectiveness of standardized and individualized acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic low back pain. A single-center randomized controlled single-blind trial was performed in a general medical practice in Germany run by a Chinese-born medical doctor trained in weste...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/125937 |
_version_ | 1782291534385774592 |
---|---|
author | Pach, Daniel Yang-Strobel, Xiaoli Lüdtke, Rainer Roll, Stephanie Icke, Katja Brinkhaus, Benno Witt, Claudia M. |
author_facet | Pach, Daniel Yang-Strobel, Xiaoli Lüdtke, Rainer Roll, Stephanie Icke, Katja Brinkhaus, Benno Witt, Claudia M. |
author_sort | Pach, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to compare the effectiveness of standardized and individualized acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic low back pain. A single-center randomized controlled single-blind trial was performed in a general medical practice in Germany run by a Chinese-born medical doctor trained in western and Chinese medicine. One hundred and fifty outpatients with chronic low back pain were randomly allocated to two groups (78 standardized and 72 individualized acupuncture). Patients received either standardized acupuncture or individualized acupuncture. Treatment encompassed between 10 and 15 treatments based on individual symptoms with two treatments per week. The main outcome measure was the area under the curve (AUC) summarizing eight weeks of daily rated pain severity measured with a visual analogue scale (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst imaginable pain). No significant differences between groups were observed for the AUC (individualized acupuncture mean: 1768.7 (95% CI, 1460.4; 2077.1); standardized acupuncture 1482.9 (1177.2; 1788.7); group difference, 285.8 (−33.9; 605.5) P = 0.080). In this single-center trial, individualized acupuncture was not superior to standardized acupuncture for patients suffering from chronic pain. As a next step, a multicenter noninferiority study should be performed to investigate whether standardised acupuncture treatment for chronic low back pain might be applicable in a broader usual care setting. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00758017. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3830844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38308442013-11-28 Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Pach, Daniel Yang-Strobel, Xiaoli Lüdtke, Rainer Roll, Stephanie Icke, Katja Brinkhaus, Benno Witt, Claudia M. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article We aimed to compare the effectiveness of standardized and individualized acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic low back pain. A single-center randomized controlled single-blind trial was performed in a general medical practice in Germany run by a Chinese-born medical doctor trained in western and Chinese medicine. One hundred and fifty outpatients with chronic low back pain were randomly allocated to two groups (78 standardized and 72 individualized acupuncture). Patients received either standardized acupuncture or individualized acupuncture. Treatment encompassed between 10 and 15 treatments based on individual symptoms with two treatments per week. The main outcome measure was the area under the curve (AUC) summarizing eight weeks of daily rated pain severity measured with a visual analogue scale (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst imaginable pain). No significant differences between groups were observed for the AUC (individualized acupuncture mean: 1768.7 (95% CI, 1460.4; 2077.1); standardized acupuncture 1482.9 (1177.2; 1788.7); group difference, 285.8 (−33.9; 605.5) P = 0.080). In this single-center trial, individualized acupuncture was not superior to standardized acupuncture for patients suffering from chronic pain. As a next step, a multicenter noninferiority study should be performed to investigate whether standardised acupuncture treatment for chronic low back pain might be applicable in a broader usual care setting. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00758017. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3830844/ /pubmed/24288556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/125937 Text en Copyright © 2013 Daniel Pach et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pach, Daniel Yang-Strobel, Xiaoli Lüdtke, Rainer Roll, Stephanie Icke, Katja Brinkhaus, Benno Witt, Claudia M. Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Standardized versus Individualized Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | standardized versus individualized acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/125937 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pachdaniel standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yangstrobelxiaoli standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ludtkerainer standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rollstephanie standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ickekatja standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brinkhausbenno standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wittclaudiam standardizedversusindividualizedacupunctureforchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial |