Cargando…

The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery

Biological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garvin, Alex M., Holzinger, Ralf, Berner, Florian, Krebs, Walter, Hostettler, Bernhard, Lardi, Elges, Hertli, Christian, Quartermaine, Roy, Stamm, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797
_version_ 1782291536864608256
author Garvin, Alex M.
Holzinger, Ralf
Berner, Florian
Krebs, Walter
Hostettler, Bernhard
Lardi, Elges
Hertli, Christian
Quartermaine, Roy
Stamm, Christoph
author_facet Garvin, Alex M.
Holzinger, Ralf
Berner, Florian
Krebs, Walter
Hostettler, Bernhard
Lardi, Elges
Hertli, Christian
Quartermaine, Roy
Stamm, Christoph
author_sort Garvin, Alex M.
collection PubMed
description Biological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation. Currently, DNA samples are normally dried or frozen to limit their degradation prior to their arrival at the laboratory. In this study, the effect of the sample drying rate on DNA preservation was investigated, as well as a comparison between drying and freezing methods. The drying performances of two commercially available DNA collection tools (swab and drying tube) with different drying rates were evaluated. The swabs were used to collect human saliva, placed into the drying tubes, and stored in a controlled environment at 25°C and 60% relative humidity, or frozen at −20°C, for 2 weeks. Swabs that were stored in fast sample drying tubes yielded 95% recoverable DNA, whereas swabs stored in tubes with slower sample drying rates yielded only 12% recoverable DNA; saliva stored in a microtube at −20°C was used as a control. Thus, DNA sampling tools that offer rapid drying can significantly improve the preservation of DNA collected on a swab, increasing the quantity of DNA available for subsequent analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3830855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38308552013-11-28 The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery Garvin, Alex M. Holzinger, Ralf Berner, Florian Krebs, Walter Hostettler, Bernhard Lardi, Elges Hertli, Christian Quartermaine, Roy Stamm, Christoph Biomed Res Int Research Article Biological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation. Currently, DNA samples are normally dried or frozen to limit their degradation prior to their arrival at the laboratory. In this study, the effect of the sample drying rate on DNA preservation was investigated, as well as a comparison between drying and freezing methods. The drying performances of two commercially available DNA collection tools (swab and drying tube) with different drying rates were evaluated. The swabs were used to collect human saliva, placed into the drying tubes, and stored in a controlled environment at 25°C and 60% relative humidity, or frozen at −20°C, for 2 weeks. Swabs that were stored in fast sample drying tubes yielded 95% recoverable DNA, whereas swabs stored in tubes with slower sample drying rates yielded only 12% recoverable DNA; saliva stored in a microtube at −20°C was used as a control. Thus, DNA sampling tools that offer rapid drying can significantly improve the preservation of DNA collected on a swab, increasing the quantity of DNA available for subsequent analysis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3830855/ /pubmed/24288659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797 Text en Copyright © 2013 Alex M. Garvin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garvin, Alex M.
Holzinger, Ralf
Berner, Florian
Krebs, Walter
Hostettler, Bernhard
Lardi, Elges
Hertli, Christian
Quartermaine, Roy
Stamm, Christoph
The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title_full The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title_fullStr The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title_full_unstemmed The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title_short The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
title_sort forensix evidence collection tube and its impact on dna preservation and recovery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797
work_keys_str_mv AT garvinalexm theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT holzingerralf theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT bernerflorian theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT krebswalter theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT hostettlerbernhard theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT lardielges theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT hertlichristian theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT quartermaineroy theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT stammchristoph theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT garvinalexm forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT holzingerralf forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT bernerflorian forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT krebswalter forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT hostettlerbernhard forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT lardielges forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT hertlichristian forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT quartermaineroy forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery
AT stammchristoph forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery