Cargando…
The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery
Biological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797 |
_version_ | 1782291536864608256 |
---|---|
author | Garvin, Alex M. Holzinger, Ralf Berner, Florian Krebs, Walter Hostettler, Bernhard Lardi, Elges Hertli, Christian Quartermaine, Roy Stamm, Christoph |
author_facet | Garvin, Alex M. Holzinger, Ralf Berner, Florian Krebs, Walter Hostettler, Bernhard Lardi, Elges Hertli, Christian Quartermaine, Roy Stamm, Christoph |
author_sort | Garvin, Alex M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation. Currently, DNA samples are normally dried or frozen to limit their degradation prior to their arrival at the laboratory. In this study, the effect of the sample drying rate on DNA preservation was investigated, as well as a comparison between drying and freezing methods. The drying performances of two commercially available DNA collection tools (swab and drying tube) with different drying rates were evaluated. The swabs were used to collect human saliva, placed into the drying tubes, and stored in a controlled environment at 25°C and 60% relative humidity, or frozen at −20°C, for 2 weeks. Swabs that were stored in fast sample drying tubes yielded 95% recoverable DNA, whereas swabs stored in tubes with slower sample drying rates yielded only 12% recoverable DNA; saliva stored in a microtube at −20°C was used as a control. Thus, DNA sampling tools that offer rapid drying can significantly improve the preservation of DNA collected on a swab, increasing the quantity of DNA available for subsequent analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3830855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38308552013-11-28 The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery Garvin, Alex M. Holzinger, Ralf Berner, Florian Krebs, Walter Hostettler, Bernhard Lardi, Elges Hertli, Christian Quartermaine, Roy Stamm, Christoph Biomed Res Int Research Article Biological samples are vulnerable to degradation from the time they are collected until they are analysed at the laboratory. Biological contaminants, such as bacteria, fungi, and enzymes, as well as environmental factors, such as sunlight, heat, and humidity, can increase the rate of DNA degradation. Currently, DNA samples are normally dried or frozen to limit their degradation prior to their arrival at the laboratory. In this study, the effect of the sample drying rate on DNA preservation was investigated, as well as a comparison between drying and freezing methods. The drying performances of two commercially available DNA collection tools (swab and drying tube) with different drying rates were evaluated. The swabs were used to collect human saliva, placed into the drying tubes, and stored in a controlled environment at 25°C and 60% relative humidity, or frozen at −20°C, for 2 weeks. Swabs that were stored in fast sample drying tubes yielded 95% recoverable DNA, whereas swabs stored in tubes with slower sample drying rates yielded only 12% recoverable DNA; saliva stored in a microtube at −20°C was used as a control. Thus, DNA sampling tools that offer rapid drying can significantly improve the preservation of DNA collected on a swab, increasing the quantity of DNA available for subsequent analysis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3830855/ /pubmed/24288659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797 Text en Copyright © 2013 Alex M. Garvin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Garvin, Alex M. Holzinger, Ralf Berner, Florian Krebs, Walter Hostettler, Bernhard Lardi, Elges Hertli, Christian Quartermaine, Roy Stamm, Christoph The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title | The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title_full | The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title_fullStr | The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title_full_unstemmed | The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title_short | The forensiX Evidence Collection Tube and Its Impact on DNA Preservation and Recovery |
title_sort | forensix evidence collection tube and its impact on dna preservation and recovery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3830855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/105797 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garvinalexm theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT holzingerralf theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT bernerflorian theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT krebswalter theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT hostettlerbernhard theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT lardielges theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT hertlichristian theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT quartermaineroy theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT stammchristoph theforensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT garvinalexm forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT holzingerralf forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT bernerflorian forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT krebswalter forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT hostettlerbernhard forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT lardielges forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT hertlichristian forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT quartermaineroy forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery AT stammchristoph forensixevidencecollectiontubeanditsimpactondnapreservationandrecovery |