Cargando…

Fidelity in complex behaviour change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrity

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to (1) demonstrate the development and testing of tools and procedures designed to monitor and assess the integrity of a complex intervention for chronic pain (COping with persistent Pain, Effectiveness Research into Self-management (COPERS) course); and (2) mak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mars, Tom, Ellard, David, Carnes, Dawn, Homer, Kate, Underwood, Martin, Taylor, Stephanie J C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3831105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24240140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003555
_version_ 1782291570595201024
author Mars, Tom
Ellard, David
Carnes, Dawn
Homer, Kate
Underwood, Martin
Taylor, Stephanie J C
author_facet Mars, Tom
Ellard, David
Carnes, Dawn
Homer, Kate
Underwood, Martin
Taylor, Stephanie J C
author_sort Mars, Tom
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to (1) demonstrate the development and testing of tools and procedures designed to monitor and assess the integrity of a complex intervention for chronic pain (COping with persistent Pain, Effectiveness Research into Self-management (COPERS) course); and (2) make recommendations based on our experiences. DESIGN: Fidelity assessment of a two-arm randomised controlled trial intervention, assessing the adherence and competence of the facilitators delivering the intervention. SETTING: The intervention was delivered in the community in two centres in the UK: one inner city and one a mix of rural and urban locations. PARTICIPANTS: 403 people with chronic musculoskeletal pain were enrolled in the intervention arm and 300 attended the self-management course. Thirty lay and healthcare professionals were trained and 24 delivered the courses (2 per course). We ran 31 courses for up to 16 people per course and all were audio recorded. INTERVENTIONS: The course was run over three and a half days; facilitators delivered a semistructured manualised course. OUTCOMES: We designed three measures to evaluate fidelity assessing adherence to the manual, competence and overall impression. RESULTS: We evaluated a random sample of four components from each course (n=122). The evaluation forms were reliable and had good face validity. There were high levels of adherence in the delivery: overall adherence was two (maximum 2, IQR 1.67–2.00), facilitator competence exhibited more variability, and overall competence was 1.5 (maximum 2, IQR 1.25–2.00). Overall impression was three (maximum 4, IQR 2.00–3.00). CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring and assessing adherence and competence at the point of intervention delivery can be realised most efficiently by embedding the principles of fidelity measurement within the design stage of complex interventions and the training and assessment of those delivering the intervention. More work is necessary to ensure that more robust systems of fidelity evaluation accompany the growth of complex interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN NO: ISRCTN24426731.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3831105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38311052013-11-18 Fidelity in complex behaviour change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrity Mars, Tom Ellard, David Carnes, Dawn Homer, Kate Underwood, Martin Taylor, Stephanie J C BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to (1) demonstrate the development and testing of tools and procedures designed to monitor and assess the integrity of a complex intervention for chronic pain (COping with persistent Pain, Effectiveness Research into Self-management (COPERS) course); and (2) make recommendations based on our experiences. DESIGN: Fidelity assessment of a two-arm randomised controlled trial intervention, assessing the adherence and competence of the facilitators delivering the intervention. SETTING: The intervention was delivered in the community in two centres in the UK: one inner city and one a mix of rural and urban locations. PARTICIPANTS: 403 people with chronic musculoskeletal pain were enrolled in the intervention arm and 300 attended the self-management course. Thirty lay and healthcare professionals were trained and 24 delivered the courses (2 per course). We ran 31 courses for up to 16 people per course and all were audio recorded. INTERVENTIONS: The course was run over three and a half days; facilitators delivered a semistructured manualised course. OUTCOMES: We designed three measures to evaluate fidelity assessing adherence to the manual, competence and overall impression. RESULTS: We evaluated a random sample of four components from each course (n=122). The evaluation forms were reliable and had good face validity. There were high levels of adherence in the delivery: overall adherence was two (maximum 2, IQR 1.67–2.00), facilitator competence exhibited more variability, and overall competence was 1.5 (maximum 2, IQR 1.25–2.00). Overall impression was three (maximum 4, IQR 2.00–3.00). CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring and assessing adherence and competence at the point of intervention delivery can be realised most efficiently by embedding the principles of fidelity measurement within the design stage of complex interventions and the training and assessment of those delivering the intervention. More work is necessary to ensure that more robust systems of fidelity evaluation accompany the growth of complex interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN NO: ISRCTN24426731. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3831105/ /pubmed/24240140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003555 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Methods
Mars, Tom
Ellard, David
Carnes, Dawn
Homer, Kate
Underwood, Martin
Taylor, Stephanie J C
Fidelity in complex behaviour change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrity
title Fidelity in complex behaviour change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrity
title_full Fidelity in complex behaviour change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrity
title_fullStr Fidelity in complex behaviour change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrity
title_full_unstemmed Fidelity in complex behaviour change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrity
title_short Fidelity in complex behaviour change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrity
title_sort fidelity in complex behaviour change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrity
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3831105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24240140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003555
work_keys_str_mv AT marstom fidelityincomplexbehaviourchangeinterventionsastandardisedapproachtoevaluateinterventionintegrity
AT ellarddavid fidelityincomplexbehaviourchangeinterventionsastandardisedapproachtoevaluateinterventionintegrity
AT carnesdawn fidelityincomplexbehaviourchangeinterventionsastandardisedapproachtoevaluateinterventionintegrity
AT homerkate fidelityincomplexbehaviourchangeinterventionsastandardisedapproachtoevaluateinterventionintegrity
AT underwoodmartin fidelityincomplexbehaviourchangeinterventionsastandardisedapproachtoevaluateinterventionintegrity
AT taylorstephaniejc fidelityincomplexbehaviourchangeinterventionsastandardisedapproachtoevaluateinterventionintegrity