Cargando…

Inter and intra-rater repeatability of the scoring of foot pain drawings

BACKGROUND: Foot pain drawings (manikins) are commonly used to describe foot pain location in self-report health surveys. Respondents shade the manikin where they experience pain. The manikin is then scored via a transparent overlay that divides the drawings into areas. In large population based stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chatterton, Benjamin D, Muller, Sara, Thomas, Martin J, Menz, Hylton B, Rome, Keith, Roddy, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3831824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24180324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-44
_version_ 1782291624075722752
author Chatterton, Benjamin D
Muller, Sara
Thomas, Martin J
Menz, Hylton B
Rome, Keith
Roddy, Edward
author_facet Chatterton, Benjamin D
Muller, Sara
Thomas, Martin J
Menz, Hylton B
Rome, Keith
Roddy, Edward
author_sort Chatterton, Benjamin D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Foot pain drawings (manikins) are commonly used to describe foot pain location in self-report health surveys. Respondents shade the manikin where they experience pain. The manikin is then scored via a transparent overlay that divides the drawings into areas. In large population based studies they are often scored by multiple raters. A difference in how different raters score manikins (inter-rater repeatability), or in how an individual rater scores manikins over time (intra-rater repeatability) can therefore affect data quality. This study aimed to assess inter- and intra-rater repeatability of scoring of the foot manikin. METHODS: A random sample was generated of 50 respondents to a large population based survey of adults aged 50 years and older who experienced foot pain and completed a foot manikin. Manikins were initially scored by any one of six administrative staff (Rating 1). These manikins were re-scored by a second rater (Rating 2). The second rater then re-scored the manikins one week later (Rating 3). The following scores were compared: Rating 1 versus Rating 2 (inter-rater repeatability), and Rating 2 versus Rating 3 (intra-rater repeatability). A novel set of clinically relevant foot pain regions made up of one or more individual areas on the foot manikin were developed, and assessed for inter- and intra-rater repeatability. RESULTS: Scoring agreement of 100% (all 50 manikins) was seen in 69% (40 out of 58) of individual areas for inter-rater scoring (range 94 to 100%), and 81% (47 out of 58) of areas for intra-rater scoring (range 96 to 100%). All areas had a kappa value of ≥0.70 for inter- and intra-rater scoring. Scoring agreement of 100% was seen in 50% (10 out of 20) of pain regions for inter-rater scoring (range 96 to 100%), and 95% (19 out of 20) of regions for intra-rater scoring (range 98 to 100%). All regions had a kappa value of >0.70 for inter- and intra-rater scoring. CONCLUSIONS: Individual and multiple raters can reliably score the foot pain manikin. In addition, our proposed regions may be used to reliably classify different patterns of foot pain using the foot manikin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3831824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38318242013-11-19 Inter and intra-rater repeatability of the scoring of foot pain drawings Chatterton, Benjamin D Muller, Sara Thomas, Martin J Menz, Hylton B Rome, Keith Roddy, Edward J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Foot pain drawings (manikins) are commonly used to describe foot pain location in self-report health surveys. Respondents shade the manikin where they experience pain. The manikin is then scored via a transparent overlay that divides the drawings into areas. In large population based studies they are often scored by multiple raters. A difference in how different raters score manikins (inter-rater repeatability), or in how an individual rater scores manikins over time (intra-rater repeatability) can therefore affect data quality. This study aimed to assess inter- and intra-rater repeatability of scoring of the foot manikin. METHODS: A random sample was generated of 50 respondents to a large population based survey of adults aged 50 years and older who experienced foot pain and completed a foot manikin. Manikins were initially scored by any one of six administrative staff (Rating 1). These manikins were re-scored by a second rater (Rating 2). The second rater then re-scored the manikins one week later (Rating 3). The following scores were compared: Rating 1 versus Rating 2 (inter-rater repeatability), and Rating 2 versus Rating 3 (intra-rater repeatability). A novel set of clinically relevant foot pain regions made up of one or more individual areas on the foot manikin were developed, and assessed for inter- and intra-rater repeatability. RESULTS: Scoring agreement of 100% (all 50 manikins) was seen in 69% (40 out of 58) of individual areas for inter-rater scoring (range 94 to 100%), and 81% (47 out of 58) of areas for intra-rater scoring (range 96 to 100%). All areas had a kappa value of ≥0.70 for inter- and intra-rater scoring. Scoring agreement of 100% was seen in 50% (10 out of 20) of pain regions for inter-rater scoring (range 96 to 100%), and 95% (19 out of 20) of regions for intra-rater scoring (range 98 to 100%). All regions had a kappa value of >0.70 for inter- and intra-rater scoring. CONCLUSIONS: Individual and multiple raters can reliably score the foot pain manikin. In addition, our proposed regions may be used to reliably classify different patterns of foot pain using the foot manikin. BioMed Central 2013-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3831824/ /pubmed/24180324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-44 Text en Copyright © 2013 Chatterton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chatterton, Benjamin D
Muller, Sara
Thomas, Martin J
Menz, Hylton B
Rome, Keith
Roddy, Edward
Inter and intra-rater repeatability of the scoring of foot pain drawings
title Inter and intra-rater repeatability of the scoring of foot pain drawings
title_full Inter and intra-rater repeatability of the scoring of foot pain drawings
title_fullStr Inter and intra-rater repeatability of the scoring of foot pain drawings
title_full_unstemmed Inter and intra-rater repeatability of the scoring of foot pain drawings
title_short Inter and intra-rater repeatability of the scoring of foot pain drawings
title_sort inter and intra-rater repeatability of the scoring of foot pain drawings
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3831824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24180324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-44
work_keys_str_mv AT chattertonbenjamind interandintraraterrepeatabilityofthescoringoffootpaindrawings
AT mullersara interandintraraterrepeatabilityofthescoringoffootpaindrawings
AT thomasmartinj interandintraraterrepeatabilityofthescoringoffootpaindrawings
AT menzhyltonb interandintraraterrepeatabilityofthescoringoffootpaindrawings
AT romekeith interandintraraterrepeatabilityofthescoringoffootpaindrawings
AT roddyedward interandintraraterrepeatabilityofthescoringoffootpaindrawings