Cargando…

Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers – do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision?

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine the usefulness of ambulatory 24-hour Holter monitoring in detecting asymptomatic pacemaker (PM) malfunction episodes in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers whose pacing and sensing parameters were proper, as seen in routine post-implantation follow-ups. MATERIA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chudzik, Michal, Klimczak, Artur, Wranicz, Jerzy Krzysztof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3832827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273562
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.38675
_version_ 1782291744977584128
author Chudzik, Michal
Klimczak, Artur
Wranicz, Jerzy Krzysztof
author_facet Chudzik, Michal
Klimczak, Artur
Wranicz, Jerzy Krzysztof
author_sort Chudzik, Michal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine the usefulness of ambulatory 24-hour Holter monitoring in detecting asymptomatic pacemaker (PM) malfunction episodes in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers whose pacing and sensing parameters were proper, as seen in routine post-implantation follow-ups. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ambulatory 24-hour Holter recordings (HM) were performed in 100 patients with DDD pacemakers 1 day after the implantation. Only asymptomatic patients with proper pacing and sensing parameters (assessed on PM telemetry on the first day post-implantation) were enrolled in the study. The following parameters were assessed: failure to pace, failure to sense (both oversensing and undersensing episodes) as well as the percentage of all PM disturbances. RESULTS: Despite proper sensing and pacing parameters, HM revealed PM disturbances in 23 patients out of 100 (23%). Atrial undersensing episodes were found in 12 patients (p < 0.005) with totally 963 episodes and failure to capture in 1 patient (1%). T wave oversensing was the most common ventricular channel disorder (1316 episodes in 9 patients, p < 0.0005). Malfunction episodes occurred sporadically, leading to pauses of up to 1.6 s or temporary bradycardia, which were, nevertheless, not accompanied by clinical symptoms. No ventricular pacing disturbances were found. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic pacemaker dysfunction may be observed in nearly 25% of patients with proper DDD parameters after implantation. Thus, ambulatory HM during the early post-implantation period may be a useful tool to detect the need to reprogram PM parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3832827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38328272013-11-22 Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers – do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision? Chudzik, Michal Klimczak, Artur Wranicz, Jerzy Krzysztof Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine the usefulness of ambulatory 24-hour Holter monitoring in detecting asymptomatic pacemaker (PM) malfunction episodes in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers whose pacing and sensing parameters were proper, as seen in routine post-implantation follow-ups. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ambulatory 24-hour Holter recordings (HM) were performed in 100 patients with DDD pacemakers 1 day after the implantation. Only asymptomatic patients with proper pacing and sensing parameters (assessed on PM telemetry on the first day post-implantation) were enrolled in the study. The following parameters were assessed: failure to pace, failure to sense (both oversensing and undersensing episodes) as well as the percentage of all PM disturbances. RESULTS: Despite proper sensing and pacing parameters, HM revealed PM disturbances in 23 patients out of 100 (23%). Atrial undersensing episodes were found in 12 patients (p < 0.005) with totally 963 episodes and failure to capture in 1 patient (1%). T wave oversensing was the most common ventricular channel disorder (1316 episodes in 9 patients, p < 0.0005). Malfunction episodes occurred sporadically, leading to pauses of up to 1.6 s or temporary bradycardia, which were, nevertheless, not accompanied by clinical symptoms. No ventricular pacing disturbances were found. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic pacemaker dysfunction may be observed in nearly 25% of patients with proper DDD parameters after implantation. Thus, ambulatory HM during the early post-implantation period may be a useful tool to detect the need to reprogram PM parameters. Termedia Publishing House 2013-11-05 2013-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3832827/ /pubmed/24273562 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.38675 Text en Copyright © 2013 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Chudzik, Michal
Klimczak, Artur
Wranicz, Jerzy Krzysztof
Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers – do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision?
title Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers – do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision?
title_full Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers – do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision?
title_fullStr Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers – do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision?
title_full_unstemmed Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers – do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision?
title_short Ambulatory Holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with DDD pacemakers – do we need ACC/AHA Guidelines revision?
title_sort ambulatory holter monitoring in asymptomatic patients with ddd pacemakers – do we need acc/aha guidelines revision?
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3832827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24273562
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.38675
work_keys_str_mv AT chudzikmichal ambulatoryholtermonitoringinasymptomaticpatientswithdddpacemakersdoweneedaccahaguidelinesrevision
AT klimczakartur ambulatoryholtermonitoringinasymptomaticpatientswithdddpacemakersdoweneedaccahaguidelinesrevision
AT wraniczjerzykrzysztof ambulatoryholtermonitoringinasymptomaticpatientswithdddpacemakersdoweneedaccahaguidelinesrevision