Cargando…
Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians
Objective. To compare novice clinicians' performance using GlideScope videolaryngoscopy (GVL) to direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methods. This was a prospective, randomized crossover study. Incoming pediatric interns intubated pediatric simulators in four normal and difficult airway scenarios with GV...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/407547 |
_version_ | 1782291780347101184 |
---|---|
author | Rabiner, Joni E. Auerbach, Marc Avner, Jeffrey R. Daswani, Dina Khine, Hnin |
author_facet | Rabiner, Joni E. Auerbach, Marc Avner, Jeffrey R. Daswani, Dina Khine, Hnin |
author_sort | Rabiner, Joni E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. To compare novice clinicians' performance using GlideScope videolaryngoscopy (GVL) to direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methods. This was a prospective, randomized crossover study. Incoming pediatric interns intubated pediatric simulators in four normal and difficult airway scenarios with GVL and DL. Primary outcomes included time to intubation and rate of successful intubation. Interns rated their satisfaction of the devices and chose the preferred device. Results. Twenty-five interns were included. In the normal airway scenario, there were no differences in mean time for intubation with GVL or DL (61.4 versus 67.4 seconds, P = NS) or number of successful intubations (19 versus 18, P = NS). In the difficult airway scenario, interns took longer to intubate with GVL than DL (87.7 versus 61.3 seconds, P = 0.018), but there were no differences in successful intubations (14 versus 15, P = NS). There was a trend towards higher satisfaction for GVL than DL (7.3 versus 6.4, P = NS), and GVL was chosen as the preferred device by a majority of interns (17/25, 68%). Conclusions. For novice clinicians, GVL does not improve time to intubation or intubation success rates in a pediatric simulator model of normal and difficult airway scenarios. Still, these novice clinicians overall preferred GVL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3833063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38330632013-11-28 Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians Rabiner, Joni E. Auerbach, Marc Avner, Jeffrey R. Daswani, Dina Khine, Hnin Emerg Med Int Research Article Objective. To compare novice clinicians' performance using GlideScope videolaryngoscopy (GVL) to direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methods. This was a prospective, randomized crossover study. Incoming pediatric interns intubated pediatric simulators in four normal and difficult airway scenarios with GVL and DL. Primary outcomes included time to intubation and rate of successful intubation. Interns rated their satisfaction of the devices and chose the preferred device. Results. Twenty-five interns were included. In the normal airway scenario, there were no differences in mean time for intubation with GVL or DL (61.4 versus 67.4 seconds, P = NS) or number of successful intubations (19 versus 18, P = NS). In the difficult airway scenario, interns took longer to intubate with GVL than DL (87.7 versus 61.3 seconds, P = 0.018), but there were no differences in successful intubations (14 versus 15, P = NS). There was a trend towards higher satisfaction for GVL than DL (7.3 versus 6.4, P = NS), and GVL was chosen as the preferred device by a majority of interns (17/25, 68%). Conclusions. For novice clinicians, GVL does not improve time to intubation or intubation success rates in a pediatric simulator model of normal and difficult airway scenarios. Still, these novice clinicians overall preferred GVL. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3833063/ /pubmed/24288617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/407547 Text en Copyright © 2013 Joni E. Rabiner et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rabiner, Joni E. Auerbach, Marc Avner, Jeffrey R. Daswani, Dina Khine, Hnin Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians |
title | Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians |
title_full | Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians |
title_fullStr | Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians |
title_short | Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians |
title_sort | comparison of glidescope videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for intubation of a pediatric simulator by novice physicians |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24288617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/407547 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rabinerjonie comparisonofglidescopevideolaryngoscopytodirectlaryngoscopyforintubationofapediatricsimulatorbynovicephysicians AT auerbachmarc comparisonofglidescopevideolaryngoscopytodirectlaryngoscopyforintubationofapediatricsimulatorbynovicephysicians AT avnerjeffreyr comparisonofglidescopevideolaryngoscopytodirectlaryngoscopyforintubationofapediatricsimulatorbynovicephysicians AT daswanidina comparisonofglidescopevideolaryngoscopytodirectlaryngoscopyforintubationofapediatricsimulatorbynovicephysicians AT khinehnin comparisonofglidescopevideolaryngoscopytodirectlaryngoscopyforintubationofapediatricsimulatorbynovicephysicians |