Cargando…

Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND: Both gemcitabine and bexarotene are established single agents for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of combining these drugs in a single-arm phase II study. METHODS: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients who had failed standard s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Illidge, T, Chan, C, Counsell, N, Morris, S, Scarisbrick, J, Gilson, D, Popova, B, Patrick, P, Smith, P, Whittaker, S, Cowan, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.616
_version_ 1782291807612174336
author Illidge, T
Chan, C
Counsell, N
Morris, S
Scarisbrick, J
Gilson, D
Popova, B
Patrick, P
Smith, P
Whittaker, S
Cowan, R
author_facet Illidge, T
Chan, C
Counsell, N
Morris, S
Scarisbrick, J
Gilson, D
Popova, B
Patrick, P
Smith, P
Whittaker, S
Cowan, R
author_sort Illidge, T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both gemcitabine and bexarotene are established single agents for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of combining these drugs in a single-arm phase II study. METHODS: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients who had failed standard skin-directed therapy and at least one prior systemic therapy were given four cycles of gemcitabine and concurrent bexarotene for 12 weeks. Responders were continued on bexarotene maintenance until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The median age was 65 years, stage IB (n=5), stage IIA (n=2), stage IIB (n=8), stage III (n=8) and stage IVA (n=12), 17 patients were erythrodermic, 17 patients were B1, and 10 patients were both erythrodermic and B1. Thirty (86%) patients completed four cycles of gemcitabine. In all, 80.0% of patients demonstrated a reduction in modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) score although the objective disease response rate at 12 weeks was 31% (partial response (PR) 31%) and at 24 weeks 14% (PR 14%, stable disease (SD) 23%, progressive disease (PD) 54%, not evaluable 9%). Median progression-free survival was 5.3 months and median overall survival was 21.2 months. CONCLUSION: The overall response rate of the combination did not reach the specified target to proceed further and is lower than that previously reported for gemcitabine as a single agent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3833210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38332102014-11-12 Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma Illidge, T Chan, C Counsell, N Morris, S Scarisbrick, J Gilson, D Popova, B Patrick, P Smith, P Whittaker, S Cowan, R Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Both gemcitabine and bexarotene are established single agents for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of combining these drugs in a single-arm phase II study. METHODS: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients who had failed standard skin-directed therapy and at least one prior systemic therapy were given four cycles of gemcitabine and concurrent bexarotene for 12 weeks. Responders were continued on bexarotene maintenance until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The median age was 65 years, stage IB (n=5), stage IIA (n=2), stage IIB (n=8), stage III (n=8) and stage IVA (n=12), 17 patients were erythrodermic, 17 patients were B1, and 10 patients were both erythrodermic and B1. Thirty (86%) patients completed four cycles of gemcitabine. In all, 80.0% of patients demonstrated a reduction in modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) score although the objective disease response rate at 12 weeks was 31% (partial response (PR) 31%) and at 24 weeks 14% (PR 14%, stable disease (SD) 23%, progressive disease (PD) 54%, not evaluable 9%). Median progression-free survival was 5.3 months and median overall survival was 21.2 months. CONCLUSION: The overall response rate of the combination did not reach the specified target to proceed further and is lower than that previously reported for gemcitabine as a single agent. Nature Publishing Group 2013-11-12 2013-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3833210/ /pubmed/24136145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.616 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Illidge, T
Chan, C
Counsell, N
Morris, S
Scarisbrick, J
Gilson, D
Popova, B
Patrick, P
Smith, P
Whittaker, S
Cowan, R
Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
title Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
title_full Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
title_fullStr Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
title_short Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
title_sort phase ii study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (gembex) in the treatment of cutaneous t-cell lymphoma
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.616
work_keys_str_mv AT illidget phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma
AT chanc phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma
AT counselln phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma
AT morriss phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma
AT scarisbrickj phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma
AT gilsond phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma
AT popovab phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma
AT patrickp phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma
AT smithp phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma
AT whittakers phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma
AT cowanr phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma