Cargando…
Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
BACKGROUND: Both gemcitabine and bexarotene are established single agents for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of combining these drugs in a single-arm phase II study. METHODS: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients who had failed standard s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.616 |
_version_ | 1782291807612174336 |
---|---|
author | Illidge, T Chan, C Counsell, N Morris, S Scarisbrick, J Gilson, D Popova, B Patrick, P Smith, P Whittaker, S Cowan, R |
author_facet | Illidge, T Chan, C Counsell, N Morris, S Scarisbrick, J Gilson, D Popova, B Patrick, P Smith, P Whittaker, S Cowan, R |
author_sort | Illidge, T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Both gemcitabine and bexarotene are established single agents for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of combining these drugs in a single-arm phase II study. METHODS: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients who had failed standard skin-directed therapy and at least one prior systemic therapy were given four cycles of gemcitabine and concurrent bexarotene for 12 weeks. Responders were continued on bexarotene maintenance until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The median age was 65 years, stage IB (n=5), stage IIA (n=2), stage IIB (n=8), stage III (n=8) and stage IVA (n=12), 17 patients were erythrodermic, 17 patients were B1, and 10 patients were both erythrodermic and B1. Thirty (86%) patients completed four cycles of gemcitabine. In all, 80.0% of patients demonstrated a reduction in modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) score although the objective disease response rate at 12 weeks was 31% (partial response (PR) 31%) and at 24 weeks 14% (PR 14%, stable disease (SD) 23%, progressive disease (PD) 54%, not evaluable 9%). Median progression-free survival was 5.3 months and median overall survival was 21.2 months. CONCLUSION: The overall response rate of the combination did not reach the specified target to proceed further and is lower than that previously reported for gemcitabine as a single agent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3833210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38332102014-11-12 Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma Illidge, T Chan, C Counsell, N Morris, S Scarisbrick, J Gilson, D Popova, B Patrick, P Smith, P Whittaker, S Cowan, R Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Both gemcitabine and bexarotene are established single agents for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of combining these drugs in a single-arm phase II study. METHODS: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients who had failed standard skin-directed therapy and at least one prior systemic therapy were given four cycles of gemcitabine and concurrent bexarotene for 12 weeks. Responders were continued on bexarotene maintenance until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The median age was 65 years, stage IB (n=5), stage IIA (n=2), stage IIB (n=8), stage III (n=8) and stage IVA (n=12), 17 patients were erythrodermic, 17 patients were B1, and 10 patients were both erythrodermic and B1. Thirty (86%) patients completed four cycles of gemcitabine. In all, 80.0% of patients demonstrated a reduction in modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) score although the objective disease response rate at 12 weeks was 31% (partial response (PR) 31%) and at 24 weeks 14% (PR 14%, stable disease (SD) 23%, progressive disease (PD) 54%, not evaluable 9%). Median progression-free survival was 5.3 months and median overall survival was 21.2 months. CONCLUSION: The overall response rate of the combination did not reach the specified target to proceed further and is lower than that previously reported for gemcitabine as a single agent. Nature Publishing Group 2013-11-12 2013-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3833210/ /pubmed/24136145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.616 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Illidge, T Chan, C Counsell, N Morris, S Scarisbrick, J Gilson, D Popova, B Patrick, P Smith, P Whittaker, S Cowan, R Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma |
title | Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma |
title_full | Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma |
title_fullStr | Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma |
title_short | Phase II study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (GEMBEX) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma |
title_sort | phase ii study of gemcitabine and bexarotene (gembex) in the treatment of cutaneous t-cell lymphoma |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT illidget phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma AT chanc phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma AT counselln phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma AT morriss phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma AT scarisbrickj phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma AT gilsond phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma AT popovab phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma AT patrickp phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma AT smithp phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma AT whittakers phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma AT cowanr phaseiistudyofgemcitabineandbexarotenegembexinthetreatmentofcutaneoustcelllymphoma |