Cargando…
The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine
BACKGROUND: A phase III trial demonstrated an overall survival advantage with the addition of vinflunine to best supportive care (BSC) in platinum-refractory advanced urothelial cancer. We subsequently examined the impact of an additional 2 years of survival follow-up and evaluated the influence of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24129239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.617 |
_version_ | 1782291807842861056 |
---|---|
author | Harshman, L C Fougeray, R Choueiri, T K Schutz, F A Salhi, Y Rosenberg, J E Bellmunt, J |
author_facet | Harshman, L C Fougeray, R Choueiri, T K Schutz, F A Salhi, Y Rosenberg, J E Bellmunt, J |
author_sort | Harshman, L C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A phase III trial demonstrated an overall survival advantage with the addition of vinflunine to best supportive care (BSC) in platinum-refractory advanced urothelial cancer. We subsequently examined the impact of an additional 2 years of survival follow-up and evaluated the influence of first-line platinum therapy on survival. METHODS: The 357 eligible patients from the phase III study were categorised into two cohorts depending on prior cisplatin treatment: cisplatin or non-cisplatin. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: The majority had received prior cisplatin (70.3%). Survival was higher in the cisplatin group (HR: 0.76; CI 95% 0.58–0.99; P=0.04) irrespective of treatment arm. Multivariate analysis including known prognostic factors (liver involvement, haemoglobin, performance status) and prior platinum administration did not show an independent effect of cisplatin. Vinflunine reduced the risk of death by 24% in the cisplatin-group (HR: 0.76; CI 95% 0.58–0.99; P=0.04) and by 35% in non-cisplatin patients (HR: 0.65; CI 95% 0.41–1.04; P=0.07). INTERPRETATION: Differences in prognostic factors between patients who can receive prior cisplatin and those who cannot may explain the survival differences in patients who undergo second line therapy. Prior cisplatin administration did not diminish the subsequent benefit of vinflunine over BSC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3833211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38332112014-11-12 The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine Harshman, L C Fougeray, R Choueiri, T K Schutz, F A Salhi, Y Rosenberg, J E Bellmunt, J Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: A phase III trial demonstrated an overall survival advantage with the addition of vinflunine to best supportive care (BSC) in platinum-refractory advanced urothelial cancer. We subsequently examined the impact of an additional 2 years of survival follow-up and evaluated the influence of first-line platinum therapy on survival. METHODS: The 357 eligible patients from the phase III study were categorised into two cohorts depending on prior cisplatin treatment: cisplatin or non-cisplatin. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS: The majority had received prior cisplatin (70.3%). Survival was higher in the cisplatin group (HR: 0.76; CI 95% 0.58–0.99; P=0.04) irrespective of treatment arm. Multivariate analysis including known prognostic factors (liver involvement, haemoglobin, performance status) and prior platinum administration did not show an independent effect of cisplatin. Vinflunine reduced the risk of death by 24% in the cisplatin-group (HR: 0.76; CI 95% 0.58–0.99; P=0.04) and by 35% in non-cisplatin patients (HR: 0.65; CI 95% 0.41–1.04; P=0.07). INTERPRETATION: Differences in prognostic factors between patients who can receive prior cisplatin and those who cannot may explain the survival differences in patients who undergo second line therapy. Prior cisplatin administration did not diminish the subsequent benefit of vinflunine over BSC. Nature Publishing Group 2013-11-12 2013-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3833211/ /pubmed/24129239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.617 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Harshman, L C Fougeray, R Choueiri, T K Schutz, F A Salhi, Y Rosenberg, J E Bellmunt, J The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine |
title | The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine |
title_full | The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine |
title_fullStr | The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine |
title_short | The impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine |
title_sort | impact of prior platinum therapy on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer receiving vinflunine |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24129239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.617 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harshmanlc theimpactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT fougerayr theimpactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT choueiritk theimpactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT schutzfa theimpactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT salhiy theimpactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT rosenbergje theimpactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT bellmuntj theimpactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT harshmanlc impactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT fougerayr impactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT choueiritk impactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT schutzfa impactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT salhiy impactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT rosenbergje impactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine AT bellmuntj impactofpriorplatinumtherapyonsurvivalinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcancerreceivingvinflunine |